Fecundability trends among sperm donors as a measure of donor performance

Angela C. Thyer, Phillip Patton, Kenneth A. Burry, Barbara A. Mixon, Don P. Wolf

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To examine fecundability trends among sperm donors. Design: Retrospective analysis. Setting: University-based sperm bank and donor insemination program. Patient(s): Sperm donors and recipients. Intervention(s): A group of recipients underwent IUI with cryopreserved donor sperm. Fecundability was calculated for 20 sperm donors over 800 insemination cycles. Main Outcome Measure(s): Average fecundability per donor was compared for the first 40 cycles of a donor's use and for those donors within a group of more fertile recipients. Sperm parameters, recipient ages, and number of unique recipients for each donor were analyzed. Result(s): Average donor fecundability is constant; however, individual donors demonstrated differences among their fecundabilities (overall mean, 0.09; range, 0.01- 0.26). These differences persisted for donors among a group of more fertile recipients (overall mean, 0.12; range, 0.02-0.35). A donor's fecundability at 15 cycles is predictive of his future performance. Conclusion(s): Differences in fecundability exist among sperm donors which cannot be discerned through routine semen parameters. Sperm donor fecundability should be analyzed periodically, and directors of sperm banks should consider discontinuing use of a donor whose outcome is substandard.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)891-895
Number of pages5
JournalFertility and Sterility
Volume71
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1999

Fingerprint

Fertility
Spermatozoa
Tissue Donors
Sperm Banks
Insemination
Semen
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

Keywords

  • Andrology
  • Donor insemination
  • Fecundability
  • Fecundity
  • Intrauterine insemination
  • Sperm bank

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Fecundability trends among sperm donors as a measure of donor performance. / Thyer, Angela C.; Patton, Phillip; Burry, Kenneth A.; Mixon, Barbara A.; Wolf, Don P.

In: Fertility and Sterility, Vol. 71, No. 5, 05.1999, p. 891-895.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Thyer, Angela C. ; Patton, Phillip ; Burry, Kenneth A. ; Mixon, Barbara A. ; Wolf, Don P. / Fecundability trends among sperm donors as a measure of donor performance. In: Fertility and Sterility. 1999 ; Vol. 71, No. 5. pp. 891-895.
@article{b9d9bcb1110944748adc8ba3c6872e6f,
title = "Fecundability trends among sperm donors as a measure of donor performance",
abstract = "Objective: To examine fecundability trends among sperm donors. Design: Retrospective analysis. Setting: University-based sperm bank and donor insemination program. Patient(s): Sperm donors and recipients. Intervention(s): A group of recipients underwent IUI with cryopreserved donor sperm. Fecundability was calculated for 20 sperm donors over 800 insemination cycles. Main Outcome Measure(s): Average fecundability per donor was compared for the first 40 cycles of a donor's use and for those donors within a group of more fertile recipients. Sperm parameters, recipient ages, and number of unique recipients for each donor were analyzed. Result(s): Average donor fecundability is constant; however, individual donors demonstrated differences among their fecundabilities (overall mean, 0.09; range, 0.01- 0.26). These differences persisted for donors among a group of more fertile recipients (overall mean, 0.12; range, 0.02-0.35). A donor's fecundability at 15 cycles is predictive of his future performance. Conclusion(s): Differences in fecundability exist among sperm donors which cannot be discerned through routine semen parameters. Sperm donor fecundability should be analyzed periodically, and directors of sperm banks should consider discontinuing use of a donor whose outcome is substandard.",
keywords = "Andrology, Donor insemination, Fecundability, Fecundity, Intrauterine insemination, Sperm bank",
author = "Thyer, {Angela C.} and Phillip Patton and Burry, {Kenneth A.} and Mixon, {Barbara A.} and Wolf, {Don P.}",
year = "1999",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00094-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "71",
pages = "891--895",
journal = "Fertility and Sterility",
issn = "0015-0282",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fecundability trends among sperm donors as a measure of donor performance

AU - Thyer, Angela C.

AU - Patton, Phillip

AU - Burry, Kenneth A.

AU - Mixon, Barbara A.

AU - Wolf, Don P.

PY - 1999/5

Y1 - 1999/5

N2 - Objective: To examine fecundability trends among sperm donors. Design: Retrospective analysis. Setting: University-based sperm bank and donor insemination program. Patient(s): Sperm donors and recipients. Intervention(s): A group of recipients underwent IUI with cryopreserved donor sperm. Fecundability was calculated for 20 sperm donors over 800 insemination cycles. Main Outcome Measure(s): Average fecundability per donor was compared for the first 40 cycles of a donor's use and for those donors within a group of more fertile recipients. Sperm parameters, recipient ages, and number of unique recipients for each donor were analyzed. Result(s): Average donor fecundability is constant; however, individual donors demonstrated differences among their fecundabilities (overall mean, 0.09; range, 0.01- 0.26). These differences persisted for donors among a group of more fertile recipients (overall mean, 0.12; range, 0.02-0.35). A donor's fecundability at 15 cycles is predictive of his future performance. Conclusion(s): Differences in fecundability exist among sperm donors which cannot be discerned through routine semen parameters. Sperm donor fecundability should be analyzed periodically, and directors of sperm banks should consider discontinuing use of a donor whose outcome is substandard.

AB - Objective: To examine fecundability trends among sperm donors. Design: Retrospective analysis. Setting: University-based sperm bank and donor insemination program. Patient(s): Sperm donors and recipients. Intervention(s): A group of recipients underwent IUI with cryopreserved donor sperm. Fecundability was calculated for 20 sperm donors over 800 insemination cycles. Main Outcome Measure(s): Average fecundability per donor was compared for the first 40 cycles of a donor's use and for those donors within a group of more fertile recipients. Sperm parameters, recipient ages, and number of unique recipients for each donor were analyzed. Result(s): Average donor fecundability is constant; however, individual donors demonstrated differences among their fecundabilities (overall mean, 0.09; range, 0.01- 0.26). These differences persisted for donors among a group of more fertile recipients (overall mean, 0.12; range, 0.02-0.35). A donor's fecundability at 15 cycles is predictive of his future performance. Conclusion(s): Differences in fecundability exist among sperm donors which cannot be discerned through routine semen parameters. Sperm donor fecundability should be analyzed periodically, and directors of sperm banks should consider discontinuing use of a donor whose outcome is substandard.

KW - Andrology

KW - Donor insemination

KW - Fecundability

KW - Fecundity

KW - Intrauterine insemination

KW - Sperm bank

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032967729&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032967729&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00094-1

DO - 10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00094-1

M3 - Article

C2 - 10231052

AN - SCOPUS:0032967729

VL - 71

SP - 891

EP - 895

JO - Fertility and Sterility

JF - Fertility and Sterility

SN - 0015-0282

IS - 5

ER -