TY - JOUR
T1 - Feasibility and benefits of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol for patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and heated intraperitoneal chemotharpy
T2 - A single institution experience
AU - Siddharthan, Ragavan
AU - Dewey, Elizabeth
AU - Billingsley, Kevin
AU - Gilbert, Erin
AU - Tsikitis, Vassiliki Liana
PY - 2020/6
Y1 - 2020/6
N2 - Background: Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) is reported to have a prolonged length of stay (LOS). We incorporated an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol to examine whether we could reduce our LOS. Methods: Patients were identified who underwent CRS/HIPEC from 2015 to 2018 before and after initiation of ERAS protocol. The protocol included pre-operative, peri-operative and post-operative interventions. Primary end point was LOS. Secondary endpoints were morbidity and mortality. Results: Forty patients were identified, thirty-one of which underwent CRS/HIPEC: 16 before and 15 after ERAS. The median LOS prior to ERAS was 11 days (5–20) and 7 days (5–27) after ERAS (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in 30-day morbidity (Clavien-Dindo ≥3) or mortality between the groups. Conclusions: An ERAS protocol can safely be implemented in patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC with earlier return of bowel function and decrease in LOS without increasing morbidity or mortality.
AB - Background: Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) is reported to have a prolonged length of stay (LOS). We incorporated an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol to examine whether we could reduce our LOS. Methods: Patients were identified who underwent CRS/HIPEC from 2015 to 2018 before and after initiation of ERAS protocol. The protocol included pre-operative, peri-operative and post-operative interventions. Primary end point was LOS. Secondary endpoints were morbidity and mortality. Results: Forty patients were identified, thirty-one of which underwent CRS/HIPEC: 16 before and 15 after ERAS. The median LOS prior to ERAS was 11 days (5–20) and 7 days (5–27) after ERAS (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in 30-day morbidity (Clavien-Dindo ≥3) or mortality between the groups. Conclusions: An ERAS protocol can safely be implemented in patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC with earlier return of bowel function and decrease in LOS without increasing morbidity or mortality.
KW - CRS
KW - ERAS
KW - HIPEC
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067668619&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067668619&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.06.019
DO - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.06.019
M3 - Article
C2 - 31253353
AN - SCOPUS:85067668619
SN - 0002-9610
VL - 219
SP - 1073
EP - 1075
JO - American Journal of Surgery
JF - American Journal of Surgery
IS - 6
ER -