Family decision-making to withdraw life-sustaining treatments from hospitalized patients

Virginia Tilden, Susan Tolle, Christine A. Nelson, Jonathan Fields

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

163 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: With a national trend toward less aggressive treatment of hospitalized terminally ill patients, families increasingly participate in decisions to withdraw life-sustaining treatment. Although prior research indicates decision making is stressful for families, there have been no psychometric reports of actual stress levels and few discussions of the reasoning used by families compared to clinicians in reaching the decision. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess levels of family stress associated with decisions to withdraw life-sustaining treatments, to assess factors that affected stress, and to compare families and clinicians on their reasoning about the decision. Methods: Data were collected from hospital decedent charts, family members of decedents, and clinicians who cared for decedents. Data from families were collected in individual interviews, shortly after decedent death and 6 months later, using psychometric measures and semi-structured interview questions. Clinicians were interviewed once shortly following patient death. Results: Family stress associated with the withdraw decision was high immediately following the death of the decedent and, while it decreased over time, remained high a half a year later. Several factors affected stress; most notably, stress was highest in the absence of patient advance directives. In reaching the decision, both families and clinicians prioritized what the patient would want, although families, more strongly than clinicians, endorsed doing everything medically possible to prolong the patient's life. Conclusions: Findings add compelling evidence for the power of advance directives, whether written or verbal, to reduce the stress associated with family decision-making.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)105-115
Number of pages11
JournalNursing Research
Volume50
Issue number2
StatePublished - Mar 2001

Fingerprint

Decision Making
Therapeutics
Advance Directives
Psychometrics
Interviews
Terminally Ill
Research

Keywords

  • End-of-life decision-making
  • Family stress
  • Treatment withdrawal

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Family decision-making to withdraw life-sustaining treatments from hospitalized patients. / Tilden, Virginia; Tolle, Susan; Nelson, Christine A.; Fields, Jonathan.

In: Nursing Research, Vol. 50, No. 2, 03.2001, p. 105-115.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{63758767a4ac43abb7b8f2e8fec2bb51,
title = "Family decision-making to withdraw life-sustaining treatments from hospitalized patients",
abstract = "Background: With a national trend toward less aggressive treatment of hospitalized terminally ill patients, families increasingly participate in decisions to withdraw life-sustaining treatment. Although prior research indicates decision making is stressful for families, there have been no psychometric reports of actual stress levels and few discussions of the reasoning used by families compared to clinicians in reaching the decision. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess levels of family stress associated with decisions to withdraw life-sustaining treatments, to assess factors that affected stress, and to compare families and clinicians on their reasoning about the decision. Methods: Data were collected from hospital decedent charts, family members of decedents, and clinicians who cared for decedents. Data from families were collected in individual interviews, shortly after decedent death and 6 months later, using psychometric measures and semi-structured interview questions. Clinicians were interviewed once shortly following patient death. Results: Family stress associated with the withdraw decision was high immediately following the death of the decedent and, while it decreased over time, remained high a half a year later. Several factors affected stress; most notably, stress was highest in the absence of patient advance directives. In reaching the decision, both families and clinicians prioritized what the patient would want, although families, more strongly than clinicians, endorsed doing everything medically possible to prolong the patient's life. Conclusions: Findings add compelling evidence for the power of advance directives, whether written or verbal, to reduce the stress associated with family decision-making.",
keywords = "End-of-life decision-making, Family stress, Treatment withdrawal",
author = "Virginia Tilden and Susan Tolle and Nelson, {Christine A.} and Jonathan Fields",
year = "2001",
month = "3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "50",
pages = "105--115",
journal = "Nursing Research",
issn = "0029-6562",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Family decision-making to withdraw life-sustaining treatments from hospitalized patients

AU - Tilden, Virginia

AU - Tolle, Susan

AU - Nelson, Christine A.

AU - Fields, Jonathan

PY - 2001/3

Y1 - 2001/3

N2 - Background: With a national trend toward less aggressive treatment of hospitalized terminally ill patients, families increasingly participate in decisions to withdraw life-sustaining treatment. Although prior research indicates decision making is stressful for families, there have been no psychometric reports of actual stress levels and few discussions of the reasoning used by families compared to clinicians in reaching the decision. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess levels of family stress associated with decisions to withdraw life-sustaining treatments, to assess factors that affected stress, and to compare families and clinicians on their reasoning about the decision. Methods: Data were collected from hospital decedent charts, family members of decedents, and clinicians who cared for decedents. Data from families were collected in individual interviews, shortly after decedent death and 6 months later, using psychometric measures and semi-structured interview questions. Clinicians were interviewed once shortly following patient death. Results: Family stress associated with the withdraw decision was high immediately following the death of the decedent and, while it decreased over time, remained high a half a year later. Several factors affected stress; most notably, stress was highest in the absence of patient advance directives. In reaching the decision, both families and clinicians prioritized what the patient would want, although families, more strongly than clinicians, endorsed doing everything medically possible to prolong the patient's life. Conclusions: Findings add compelling evidence for the power of advance directives, whether written or verbal, to reduce the stress associated with family decision-making.

AB - Background: With a national trend toward less aggressive treatment of hospitalized terminally ill patients, families increasingly participate in decisions to withdraw life-sustaining treatment. Although prior research indicates decision making is stressful for families, there have been no psychometric reports of actual stress levels and few discussions of the reasoning used by families compared to clinicians in reaching the decision. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess levels of family stress associated with decisions to withdraw life-sustaining treatments, to assess factors that affected stress, and to compare families and clinicians on their reasoning about the decision. Methods: Data were collected from hospital decedent charts, family members of decedents, and clinicians who cared for decedents. Data from families were collected in individual interviews, shortly after decedent death and 6 months later, using psychometric measures and semi-structured interview questions. Clinicians were interviewed once shortly following patient death. Results: Family stress associated with the withdraw decision was high immediately following the death of the decedent and, while it decreased over time, remained high a half a year later. Several factors affected stress; most notably, stress was highest in the absence of patient advance directives. In reaching the decision, both families and clinicians prioritized what the patient would want, although families, more strongly than clinicians, endorsed doing everything medically possible to prolong the patient's life. Conclusions: Findings add compelling evidence for the power of advance directives, whether written or verbal, to reduce the stress associated with family decision-making.

KW - End-of-life decision-making

KW - Family stress

KW - Treatment withdrawal

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035287047&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035287047&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 50

SP - 105

EP - 115

JO - Nursing Research

JF - Nursing Research

SN - 0029-6562

IS - 2

ER -