Failure to thrive

Current clinical concepts

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

• Based on consensus, FTT is best considered a physical sign of undernutrition and not a clinical syndrome caused by "organic" or "nonorganic" factors. (1)(2) • Based on strong research evidence, infants and young children may cross major percentile lines on growth curves during a normal course of growth. Therefore, documentation of weights or lengths falling off of growth channels is not, by itself, proof of FTT. (3) • Based on conflicting research evidence, it is unclear how many children have adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes from FTT. (4)(5)(6)(7)(8) • Based on some research evidence, extensive laboratory screening is of little utility in the evaluation of FTT. (12) • Based on some research evidence, certain children who appear to have FTT may be biologically programmed to be smaller and thinner than most children. Insulin resistance may be a mechanism, and aggressive nutritional intervention may put these children at risk of developing metabolic syndrome. (13)(14)(15).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)100-108
Number of pages9
JournalPediatrics in Review
Volume32
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2011

Fingerprint

Failure to Thrive
Research
Accidental Falls
Growth
Malnutrition
Documentation
Insulin Resistance
Weights and Measures

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Failure to thrive : Current clinical concepts. / Jaffe, Arthur.

In: Pediatrics in Review, Vol. 32, No. 3, 03.2011, p. 100-108.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{24898dea49cb410faf0a6bd93e0e370f,
title = "Failure to thrive: Current clinical concepts",
abstract = "• Based on consensus, FTT is best considered a physical sign of undernutrition and not a clinical syndrome caused by {"}organic{"} or {"}nonorganic{"} factors. (1)(2) • Based on strong research evidence, infants and young children may cross major percentile lines on growth curves during a normal course of growth. Therefore, documentation of weights or lengths falling off of growth channels is not, by itself, proof of FTT. (3) • Based on conflicting research evidence, it is unclear how many children have adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes from FTT. (4)(5)(6)(7)(8) • Based on some research evidence, extensive laboratory screening is of little utility in the evaluation of FTT. (12) • Based on some research evidence, certain children who appear to have FTT may be biologically programmed to be smaller and thinner than most children. Insulin resistance may be a mechanism, and aggressive nutritional intervention may put these children at risk of developing metabolic syndrome. (13)(14)(15).",
author = "Arthur Jaffe",
year = "2011",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1542/pir.32-3-100",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "100--108",
journal = "Pediatrics in Review",
issn = "0191-9601",
publisher = "American Academy of Pediatrics",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Failure to thrive

T2 - Current clinical concepts

AU - Jaffe, Arthur

PY - 2011/3

Y1 - 2011/3

N2 - • Based on consensus, FTT is best considered a physical sign of undernutrition and not a clinical syndrome caused by "organic" or "nonorganic" factors. (1)(2) • Based on strong research evidence, infants and young children may cross major percentile lines on growth curves during a normal course of growth. Therefore, documentation of weights or lengths falling off of growth channels is not, by itself, proof of FTT. (3) • Based on conflicting research evidence, it is unclear how many children have adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes from FTT. (4)(5)(6)(7)(8) • Based on some research evidence, extensive laboratory screening is of little utility in the evaluation of FTT. (12) • Based on some research evidence, certain children who appear to have FTT may be biologically programmed to be smaller and thinner than most children. Insulin resistance may be a mechanism, and aggressive nutritional intervention may put these children at risk of developing metabolic syndrome. (13)(14)(15).

AB - • Based on consensus, FTT is best considered a physical sign of undernutrition and not a clinical syndrome caused by "organic" or "nonorganic" factors. (1)(2) • Based on strong research evidence, infants and young children may cross major percentile lines on growth curves during a normal course of growth. Therefore, documentation of weights or lengths falling off of growth channels is not, by itself, proof of FTT. (3) • Based on conflicting research evidence, it is unclear how many children have adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes from FTT. (4)(5)(6)(7)(8) • Based on some research evidence, extensive laboratory screening is of little utility in the evaluation of FTT. (12) • Based on some research evidence, certain children who appear to have FTT may be biologically programmed to be smaller and thinner than most children. Insulin resistance may be a mechanism, and aggressive nutritional intervention may put these children at risk of developing metabolic syndrome. (13)(14)(15).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952324866&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952324866&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1542/pir.32-3-100

DO - 10.1542/pir.32-3-100

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 100

EP - 108

JO - Pediatrics in Review

JF - Pediatrics in Review

SN - 0191-9601

IS - 3

ER -