Faculty development for the 21st century

Lessons from the Society of General Internal Medicine-Hartford Collaborative Centers for the Care of Older Adults

Brent C. Williams, Valerie Weber, Stewart F. Babbott, Lynne M. Kirk, Mitchell T. Heflin, Elizabeth O'Toole, Marilyn M. Schapira, Elizabeth Eckstrom, Asher Tulsky, Andrew M. Wolf, Seth Landefeld

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this review of a recent set of faculty development initiatives to promote geriatrics teaching by general internists, nontraditional strategies to promote sustained change were identified, included enrolling a limited number of "star" faculty, creating ongoing working relationships between faculty, and developing projects for clinical or education program improvement. External funding, although limited, garnered administration support and was associated with changes in individual career trajectories. Activities to enfranchise top leadership were felt essential to sustain change. Traditional faculty development programs for clinician educators are periodic, seminar-based interventions to enhance teaching and clinical skills. In 2003/04 the Collaborative Centers for Research and Education in the Care of Older Adults were funded by the John A. Hartford Foundation and administered by the Society of General Internal Medicine. Ten academic medical centers received individual grants of $91,000, with required cost sharing, to develop collaborations between general internists and geriatricians to create sustained change in geriatrics clinical teaching and learning. Through written and structured telephone surveys, activities designed to foster sustainability at funded sites were identified, and the activities and perceived effects of funding at the 10 funded sites were compared with those of the 11 highest-ranking unfunded sites. The experience of the Collaborative Centers supports the conclusion that modest, targeted funding can provide the credibility and legitimacy crucial for clinician educators to allocate time and energy in new directions. Key success factors likely include high intensity and duration, integration into career trajectories, integration into clinical programs, and activities to enfranchise institutional leadership.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)941-947
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of the American Geriatrics Society
Volume55
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2007

Fingerprint

Teaching
Geriatrics
Cost Sharing
Education
Illegitimacy
Clinical Competence
Organized Financing
Telephone
Learning
Research
Geriatricians
Surveys and Questionnaires
Direction compound

Keywords

  • Geriatrics
  • Internship and residency
  • Medical education
  • Medical faculty
  • Teaching
  • Training program

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geriatrics and Gerontology

Cite this

Faculty development for the 21st century : Lessons from the Society of General Internal Medicine-Hartford Collaborative Centers for the Care of Older Adults. / Williams, Brent C.; Weber, Valerie; Babbott, Stewart F.; Kirk, Lynne M.; Heflin, Mitchell T.; O'Toole, Elizabeth; Schapira, Marilyn M.; Eckstrom, Elizabeth; Tulsky, Asher; Wolf, Andrew M.; Landefeld, Seth.

In: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, Vol. 55, No. 6, 06.2007, p. 941-947.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Williams, Brent C. ; Weber, Valerie ; Babbott, Stewart F. ; Kirk, Lynne M. ; Heflin, Mitchell T. ; O'Toole, Elizabeth ; Schapira, Marilyn M. ; Eckstrom, Elizabeth ; Tulsky, Asher ; Wolf, Andrew M. ; Landefeld, Seth. / Faculty development for the 21st century : Lessons from the Society of General Internal Medicine-Hartford Collaborative Centers for the Care of Older Adults. In: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2007 ; Vol. 55, No. 6. pp. 941-947.
@article{74a08113d990458291580841ea08b3b5,
title = "Faculty development for the 21st century: Lessons from the Society of General Internal Medicine-Hartford Collaborative Centers for the Care of Older Adults",
abstract = "In this review of a recent set of faculty development initiatives to promote geriatrics teaching by general internists, nontraditional strategies to promote sustained change were identified, included enrolling a limited number of {"}star{"} faculty, creating ongoing working relationships between faculty, and developing projects for clinical or education program improvement. External funding, although limited, garnered administration support and was associated with changes in individual career trajectories. Activities to enfranchise top leadership were felt essential to sustain change. Traditional faculty development programs for clinician educators are periodic, seminar-based interventions to enhance teaching and clinical skills. In 2003/04 the Collaborative Centers for Research and Education in the Care of Older Adults were funded by the John A. Hartford Foundation and administered by the Society of General Internal Medicine. Ten academic medical centers received individual grants of $91,000, with required cost sharing, to develop collaborations between general internists and geriatricians to create sustained change in geriatrics clinical teaching and learning. Through written and structured telephone surveys, activities designed to foster sustainability at funded sites were identified, and the activities and perceived effects of funding at the 10 funded sites were compared with those of the 11 highest-ranking unfunded sites. The experience of the Collaborative Centers supports the conclusion that modest, targeted funding can provide the credibility and legitimacy crucial for clinician educators to allocate time and energy in new directions. Key success factors likely include high intensity and duration, integration into career trajectories, integration into clinical programs, and activities to enfranchise institutional leadership.",
keywords = "Geriatrics, Internship and residency, Medical education, Medical faculty, Teaching, Training program",
author = "Williams, {Brent C.} and Valerie Weber and Babbott, {Stewart F.} and Kirk, {Lynne M.} and Heflin, {Mitchell T.} and Elizabeth O'Toole and Schapira, {Marilyn M.} and Elizabeth Eckstrom and Asher Tulsky and Wolf, {Andrew M.} and Seth Landefeld",
year = "2007",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01197.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "55",
pages = "941--947",
journal = "Journal of the American Geriatrics Society",
issn = "0002-8614",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Faculty development for the 21st century

T2 - Lessons from the Society of General Internal Medicine-Hartford Collaborative Centers for the Care of Older Adults

AU - Williams, Brent C.

AU - Weber, Valerie

AU - Babbott, Stewart F.

AU - Kirk, Lynne M.

AU - Heflin, Mitchell T.

AU - O'Toole, Elizabeth

AU - Schapira, Marilyn M.

AU - Eckstrom, Elizabeth

AU - Tulsky, Asher

AU - Wolf, Andrew M.

AU - Landefeld, Seth

PY - 2007/6

Y1 - 2007/6

N2 - In this review of a recent set of faculty development initiatives to promote geriatrics teaching by general internists, nontraditional strategies to promote sustained change were identified, included enrolling a limited number of "star" faculty, creating ongoing working relationships between faculty, and developing projects for clinical or education program improvement. External funding, although limited, garnered administration support and was associated with changes in individual career trajectories. Activities to enfranchise top leadership were felt essential to sustain change. Traditional faculty development programs for clinician educators are periodic, seminar-based interventions to enhance teaching and clinical skills. In 2003/04 the Collaborative Centers for Research and Education in the Care of Older Adults were funded by the John A. Hartford Foundation and administered by the Society of General Internal Medicine. Ten academic medical centers received individual grants of $91,000, with required cost sharing, to develop collaborations between general internists and geriatricians to create sustained change in geriatrics clinical teaching and learning. Through written and structured telephone surveys, activities designed to foster sustainability at funded sites were identified, and the activities and perceived effects of funding at the 10 funded sites were compared with those of the 11 highest-ranking unfunded sites. The experience of the Collaborative Centers supports the conclusion that modest, targeted funding can provide the credibility and legitimacy crucial for clinician educators to allocate time and energy in new directions. Key success factors likely include high intensity and duration, integration into career trajectories, integration into clinical programs, and activities to enfranchise institutional leadership.

AB - In this review of a recent set of faculty development initiatives to promote geriatrics teaching by general internists, nontraditional strategies to promote sustained change were identified, included enrolling a limited number of "star" faculty, creating ongoing working relationships between faculty, and developing projects for clinical or education program improvement. External funding, although limited, garnered administration support and was associated with changes in individual career trajectories. Activities to enfranchise top leadership were felt essential to sustain change. Traditional faculty development programs for clinician educators are periodic, seminar-based interventions to enhance teaching and clinical skills. In 2003/04 the Collaborative Centers for Research and Education in the Care of Older Adults were funded by the John A. Hartford Foundation and administered by the Society of General Internal Medicine. Ten academic medical centers received individual grants of $91,000, with required cost sharing, to develop collaborations between general internists and geriatricians to create sustained change in geriatrics clinical teaching and learning. Through written and structured telephone surveys, activities designed to foster sustainability at funded sites were identified, and the activities and perceived effects of funding at the 10 funded sites were compared with those of the 11 highest-ranking unfunded sites. The experience of the Collaborative Centers supports the conclusion that modest, targeted funding can provide the credibility and legitimacy crucial for clinician educators to allocate time and energy in new directions. Key success factors likely include high intensity and duration, integration into career trajectories, integration into clinical programs, and activities to enfranchise institutional leadership.

KW - Geriatrics

KW - Internship and residency

KW - Medical education

KW - Medical faculty

KW - Teaching

KW - Training program

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34347353259&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34347353259&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01197.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01197.x

M3 - Article

VL - 55

SP - 941

EP - 947

JO - Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

JF - Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

SN - 0002-8614

IS - 6

ER -