TY - JOUR
T1 - Facial resurfacing with coblation technology
AU - Weber, Stephen M.
AU - Downs, Brian W.
AU - Ferraz, Mario B.J.
AU - Wang, Tom D.
AU - Cook, Ted A.
PY - 2008/8/18
Y1 - 2008/8/18
N2 - Objective: To describe our experience with coblation technology for facial resurfacing Methods: Retrospective chart review of all patients treated with coblation at our institution Results: Twenty-four patients (22 female) underwent a total of 29 coblation procedures for aging face (n = 21) or acne scarring (n = 3). The perioral region was the most frequently treated aesthetic subunit (n = 14), followed by the lower eyelid (n = 7). Five patients underwent full-face coblation. Three patients underwent a second coblation procedure for aging face while a single patient with severe acne scarring underwent 3 procedures. Repeat coblation was delayed at least 5 months (mean, 9 months). Seventeen coblation procedures (59%) were performed concurrently with procedures including, but not limited to, injection treatment, rhinoplasty, blepharoplasty, or combined face/ necklift; no adverse events occurred. Seven procedures, including a fufl-face coblation, were performed in the office under local anesthesia and oral sedation without any adverse events. Mean follow-up was 6 months (range, 1 week to 24 months). No complications were observed. Al patients were satisfied with the results after their final coblation treatment. Conclusions: Facial coblation is a safe and effective treatment modality for facial resurfacing.
AB - Objective: To describe our experience with coblation technology for facial resurfacing Methods: Retrospective chart review of all patients treated with coblation at our institution Results: Twenty-four patients (22 female) underwent a total of 29 coblation procedures for aging face (n = 21) or acne scarring (n = 3). The perioral region was the most frequently treated aesthetic subunit (n = 14), followed by the lower eyelid (n = 7). Five patients underwent full-face coblation. Three patients underwent a second coblation procedure for aging face while a single patient with severe acne scarring underwent 3 procedures. Repeat coblation was delayed at least 5 months (mean, 9 months). Seventeen coblation procedures (59%) were performed concurrently with procedures including, but not limited to, injection treatment, rhinoplasty, blepharoplasty, or combined face/ necklift; no adverse events occurred. Seven procedures, including a fufl-face coblation, were performed in the office under local anesthesia and oral sedation without any adverse events. Mean follow-up was 6 months (range, 1 week to 24 months). No complications were observed. Al patients were satisfied with the results after their final coblation treatment. Conclusions: Facial coblation is a safe and effective treatment modality for facial resurfacing.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=49249099779&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=49249099779&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 18769690
AN - SCOPUS:49249099779
SN - 1531-0132
VL - 10
JO - MedGenMed Medscape General Medicine
JF - MedGenMed Medscape General Medicine
IS - 7
M1 - 155
ER -