External Validation of the Ventral Hernia Risk Score for Prediction of Surgical Site Infections

Mike K. Liang, Christopher J. Goodenough, Robert Martindale, J. Scott Roth, Lillian S. Kao

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Previously, we reported that the Ventral Hernia Risk Score (VHRS) was more accurate in a Veterans Affairs (VA) population in predicting surgical site infection (SSI) after open ventral hernia repair (VHR) compared with other models such as the Ventral Hernia Working Group (VHWG) model. The VHRS was developed using single-center data and stratifies SSI risk into five groups based on concomitant hernia repair, skin flaps created, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score ≥3, body mass index ≥40 kg/m2, and incision class 4. The purpose of this study was to validate the VHRS for other hospitals. Methods: A prospective database of all open VHRs performed at three institutions from 2009-2011 was utilized. All 436 patients with a follow-up of at least 1 mo were included. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) definition of SSI was utilized. Each patient was assigned a VHRS, VHWG, and CDC incision classification. Receiver-operating characteristic curves were used to assess predictive accuracy, and the areas under the curve (AUCs) were compared for the three risk-stratification systems. Results: The median follow-up was 20 mos (range 1-49 mos). During this time, 111 patients (25.5%) developed a SSI. The AUC of the VHRS (0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67-0.78) was greater than that of the VHWG (0.66; 95% CI 0.60-0.72; p

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)36-40
Number of pages5
JournalSurgical Infections
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2015

Fingerprint

Ventral Hernia
Surgical Wound Infection
Herniorrhaphy
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.)
Area Under Curve
Confidence Intervals
Veterans
ROC Curve
Body Mass Index
Databases

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Microbiology (medical)

Cite this

External Validation of the Ventral Hernia Risk Score for Prediction of Surgical Site Infections. / Liang, Mike K.; Goodenough, Christopher J.; Martindale, Robert; Roth, J. Scott; Kao, Lillian S.

In: Surgical Infections, Vol. 16, No. 1, 01.02.2015, p. 36-40.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Liang, Mike K. ; Goodenough, Christopher J. ; Martindale, Robert ; Roth, J. Scott ; Kao, Lillian S. / External Validation of the Ventral Hernia Risk Score for Prediction of Surgical Site Infections. In: Surgical Infections. 2015 ; Vol. 16, No. 1. pp. 36-40.
@article{01514c89e4824a009c336ef5f1ea42e4,
title = "External Validation of the Ventral Hernia Risk Score for Prediction of Surgical Site Infections",
abstract = "Background: Previously, we reported that the Ventral Hernia Risk Score (VHRS) was more accurate in a Veterans Affairs (VA) population in predicting surgical site infection (SSI) after open ventral hernia repair (VHR) compared with other models such as the Ventral Hernia Working Group (VHWG) model. The VHRS was developed using single-center data and stratifies SSI risk into five groups based on concomitant hernia repair, skin flaps created, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score ≥3, body mass index ≥40 kg/m2, and incision class 4. The purpose of this study was to validate the VHRS for other hospitals. Methods: A prospective database of all open VHRs performed at three institutions from 2009-2011 was utilized. All 436 patients with a follow-up of at least 1 mo were included. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) definition of SSI was utilized. Each patient was assigned a VHRS, VHWG, and CDC incision classification. Receiver-operating characteristic curves were used to assess predictive accuracy, and the areas under the curve (AUCs) were compared for the three risk-stratification systems. Results: The median follow-up was 20 mos (range 1-49 mos). During this time, 111 patients (25.5{\%}) developed a SSI. The AUC of the VHRS (0.73; 95{\%} confidence interval [CI] 0.67-0.78) was greater than that of the VHWG (0.66; 95{\%} CI 0.60-0.72; p",
author = "Liang, {Mike K.} and Goodenough, {Christopher J.} and Robert Martindale and Roth, {J. Scott} and Kao, {Lillian S.}",
year = "2015",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/sur.2014.115",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "36--40",
journal = "Surgical Infections",
issn = "1096-2964",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - External Validation of the Ventral Hernia Risk Score for Prediction of Surgical Site Infections

AU - Liang, Mike K.

AU - Goodenough, Christopher J.

AU - Martindale, Robert

AU - Roth, J. Scott

AU - Kao, Lillian S.

PY - 2015/2/1

Y1 - 2015/2/1

N2 - Background: Previously, we reported that the Ventral Hernia Risk Score (VHRS) was more accurate in a Veterans Affairs (VA) population in predicting surgical site infection (SSI) after open ventral hernia repair (VHR) compared with other models such as the Ventral Hernia Working Group (VHWG) model. The VHRS was developed using single-center data and stratifies SSI risk into five groups based on concomitant hernia repair, skin flaps created, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score ≥3, body mass index ≥40 kg/m2, and incision class 4. The purpose of this study was to validate the VHRS for other hospitals. Methods: A prospective database of all open VHRs performed at three institutions from 2009-2011 was utilized. All 436 patients with a follow-up of at least 1 mo were included. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) definition of SSI was utilized. Each patient was assigned a VHRS, VHWG, and CDC incision classification. Receiver-operating characteristic curves were used to assess predictive accuracy, and the areas under the curve (AUCs) were compared for the three risk-stratification systems. Results: The median follow-up was 20 mos (range 1-49 mos). During this time, 111 patients (25.5%) developed a SSI. The AUC of the VHRS (0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67-0.78) was greater than that of the VHWG (0.66; 95% CI 0.60-0.72; p

AB - Background: Previously, we reported that the Ventral Hernia Risk Score (VHRS) was more accurate in a Veterans Affairs (VA) population in predicting surgical site infection (SSI) after open ventral hernia repair (VHR) compared with other models such as the Ventral Hernia Working Group (VHWG) model. The VHRS was developed using single-center data and stratifies SSI risk into five groups based on concomitant hernia repair, skin flaps created, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score ≥3, body mass index ≥40 kg/m2, and incision class 4. The purpose of this study was to validate the VHRS for other hospitals. Methods: A prospective database of all open VHRs performed at three institutions from 2009-2011 was utilized. All 436 patients with a follow-up of at least 1 mo were included. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) definition of SSI was utilized. Each patient was assigned a VHRS, VHWG, and CDC incision classification. Receiver-operating characteristic curves were used to assess predictive accuracy, and the areas under the curve (AUCs) were compared for the three risk-stratification systems. Results: The median follow-up was 20 mos (range 1-49 mos). During this time, 111 patients (25.5%) developed a SSI. The AUC of the VHRS (0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67-0.78) was greater than that of the VHWG (0.66; 95% CI 0.60-0.72; p

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925016438&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84925016438&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/sur.2014.115

DO - 10.1089/sur.2014.115

M3 - Article

C2 - 25761078

AN - SCOPUS:84925016438

VL - 16

SP - 36

EP - 40

JO - Surgical Infections

JF - Surgical Infections

SN - 1096-2964

IS - 1

ER -