External anal sphincter volume measurements using 3-dimensional endoanal ultrasound

William (Tom) Gregory, Sarah Hamilton Boyles, Kimberly Simmons, Amy Corcoran, Amanda L. Clark

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Significant nerve injury to a muscle can be associated with muscle atrophy and volume loss. Three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound can measure muscle volume, but the reproducibility of the technique has not been established for the anal sphincter. Study design: Using a 10 MHz 360-degree rotating endoanal probe, we performed 3D endoanal ultrasounds on 9 nulliparous and 23 asymptomatic primiparous subjects at 12 weeks' postpartum. Two blinded examiners measured the length of the external anal sphincter (EAS) from a midsagittal image, and the width of the EAS and internal anal sphincter (IAS) from axial images at mid anal canal. The EAS volume was calculated by repetitively outlining only the EAS in each sequential axial view. Both examiners measured the EAS volumes twice, blinded to previous calculations. Results: The intrarater reliability for EAS volume was 0.79 to 0.89 (intraclass coefficient). The mean difference of the EAS volume between the 2 examiners was 0.5 mL (P = .3, t test). Correlation between the 2 examiners for measuring EAS volume was r = 0.77 (P <.001, Pearson's). The "limits of agreement" (between 2 examiners) varied by as much as 40% of the mean volume. Conclusion: Quantitative 3D ultrasound of the anal sphincter is moderately reproducible.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1243-1248
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume194
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2006

Fingerprint

Anal Canal
Muscles
Muscular Atrophy
Postpartum Period

Keywords

  • Anal incontinence
  • Endoanal ultrasound
  • Reproducibility
  • Three-dimensional

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

External anal sphincter volume measurements using 3-dimensional endoanal ultrasound. / Gregory, William (Tom); Boyles, Sarah Hamilton; Simmons, Kimberly; Corcoran, Amy; Clark, Amanda L.

In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 194, No. 5, 05.2006, p. 1243-1248.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Gregory, William (Tom) ; Boyles, Sarah Hamilton ; Simmons, Kimberly ; Corcoran, Amy ; Clark, Amanda L. / External anal sphincter volume measurements using 3-dimensional endoanal ultrasound. In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2006 ; Vol. 194, No. 5. pp. 1243-1248.
@article{337b229b0c174f56a1bf71f2b780a98d,
title = "External anal sphincter volume measurements using 3-dimensional endoanal ultrasound",
abstract = "Objective: Significant nerve injury to a muscle can be associated with muscle atrophy and volume loss. Three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound can measure muscle volume, but the reproducibility of the technique has not been established for the anal sphincter. Study design: Using a 10 MHz 360-degree rotating endoanal probe, we performed 3D endoanal ultrasounds on 9 nulliparous and 23 asymptomatic primiparous subjects at 12 weeks' postpartum. Two blinded examiners measured the length of the external anal sphincter (EAS) from a midsagittal image, and the width of the EAS and internal anal sphincter (IAS) from axial images at mid anal canal. The EAS volume was calculated by repetitively outlining only the EAS in each sequential axial view. Both examiners measured the EAS volumes twice, blinded to previous calculations. Results: The intrarater reliability for EAS volume was 0.79 to 0.89 (intraclass coefficient). The mean difference of the EAS volume between the 2 examiners was 0.5 mL (P = .3, t test). Correlation between the 2 examiners for measuring EAS volume was r = 0.77 (P <.001, Pearson's). The {"}limits of agreement{"} (between 2 examiners) varied by as much as 40{\%} of the mean volume. Conclusion: Quantitative 3D ultrasound of the anal sphincter is moderately reproducible.",
keywords = "Anal incontinence, Endoanal ultrasound, Reproducibility, Three-dimensional",
author = "Gregory, {William (Tom)} and Boyles, {Sarah Hamilton} and Kimberly Simmons and Amy Corcoran and Clark, {Amanda L.}",
year = "2006",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajog.2005.10.822",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "194",
pages = "1243--1248",
journal = "American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0002-9378",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - External anal sphincter volume measurements using 3-dimensional endoanal ultrasound

AU - Gregory, William (Tom)

AU - Boyles, Sarah Hamilton

AU - Simmons, Kimberly

AU - Corcoran, Amy

AU - Clark, Amanda L.

PY - 2006/5

Y1 - 2006/5

N2 - Objective: Significant nerve injury to a muscle can be associated with muscle atrophy and volume loss. Three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound can measure muscle volume, but the reproducibility of the technique has not been established for the anal sphincter. Study design: Using a 10 MHz 360-degree rotating endoanal probe, we performed 3D endoanal ultrasounds on 9 nulliparous and 23 asymptomatic primiparous subjects at 12 weeks' postpartum. Two blinded examiners measured the length of the external anal sphincter (EAS) from a midsagittal image, and the width of the EAS and internal anal sphincter (IAS) from axial images at mid anal canal. The EAS volume was calculated by repetitively outlining only the EAS in each sequential axial view. Both examiners measured the EAS volumes twice, blinded to previous calculations. Results: The intrarater reliability for EAS volume was 0.79 to 0.89 (intraclass coefficient). The mean difference of the EAS volume between the 2 examiners was 0.5 mL (P = .3, t test). Correlation between the 2 examiners for measuring EAS volume was r = 0.77 (P <.001, Pearson's). The "limits of agreement" (between 2 examiners) varied by as much as 40% of the mean volume. Conclusion: Quantitative 3D ultrasound of the anal sphincter is moderately reproducible.

AB - Objective: Significant nerve injury to a muscle can be associated with muscle atrophy and volume loss. Three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound can measure muscle volume, but the reproducibility of the technique has not been established for the anal sphincter. Study design: Using a 10 MHz 360-degree rotating endoanal probe, we performed 3D endoanal ultrasounds on 9 nulliparous and 23 asymptomatic primiparous subjects at 12 weeks' postpartum. Two blinded examiners measured the length of the external anal sphincter (EAS) from a midsagittal image, and the width of the EAS and internal anal sphincter (IAS) from axial images at mid anal canal. The EAS volume was calculated by repetitively outlining only the EAS in each sequential axial view. Both examiners measured the EAS volumes twice, blinded to previous calculations. Results: The intrarater reliability for EAS volume was 0.79 to 0.89 (intraclass coefficient). The mean difference of the EAS volume between the 2 examiners was 0.5 mL (P = .3, t test). Correlation between the 2 examiners for measuring EAS volume was r = 0.77 (P <.001, Pearson's). The "limits of agreement" (between 2 examiners) varied by as much as 40% of the mean volume. Conclusion: Quantitative 3D ultrasound of the anal sphincter is moderately reproducible.

KW - Anal incontinence

KW - Endoanal ultrasound

KW - Reproducibility

KW - Three-dimensional

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33646076448&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33646076448&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.10.822

DO - 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.10.822

M3 - Article

C2 - 16647906

AN - SCOPUS:33646076448

VL - 194

SP - 1243

EP - 1248

JO - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0002-9378

IS - 5

ER -