Extending contraceptive coverage under the Affordable Care Act saves public funds

Suzanne Burlone, Alison Edelman, Aaron Caughey, James Trussell, Stella Dantas, Maria Rodriguez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The Affordable Care Act (ACA) will expand health care coverage to low-income Americans. Contraception services are a mandated component of ACA plans. Study Design: A decision-Analytic model was developed to compare the costs and outcomes of the current versus the proposed plan for contraceptive coverage (Federal Poverty Level=185% vs. 399%, respectively) over 5 years. The perspective adopted was that of Oregon state insurance providers. The primary outcomes were number of pregnancies averted, health costs and quality adjusted life years (QALYs). Contraceptive failure rates, costs, projected insurance coverage, contraception use and pregnancy outcome data were obtained from the published literature. Sensitivity analyses were performed for all variables. Results: Extending contraceptive coverage both saves money and improves outcomes for Oregon state insurance plan providers. The proposed policy would prevent an additional 72 pregnancies per 1000 women over 5 years. Extending coverage is cost-effective, saving an additional $489 per woman enrolled over 5 years while increasing QALYs. Conclusions: Expanding contraceptive coverage under the Affordable Health Act is cost-effective for Oregon state insurance providers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)143-148
Number of pages6
JournalContraception
Volume87
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2013

Fingerprint

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Financial Management
Contraceptive Agents
Insurance
Costs and Cost Analysis
Quality-Adjusted Life Years
Contraception
Pregnancy
Insurance Coverage
Pregnancy Outcome
Poverty
Health Care Costs
Delivery of Health Care
Health

Keywords

  • Affordable Care Act
  • Contraception
  • Cost-effectiveness
  • Decision analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Extending contraceptive coverage under the Affordable Care Act saves public funds. / Burlone, Suzanne; Edelman, Alison; Caughey, Aaron; Trussell, James; Dantas, Stella; Rodriguez, Maria.

In: Contraception, Vol. 87, No. 2, 02.2013, p. 143-148.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a893ee736f8e4912bae9e5a506a55094,
title = "Extending contraceptive coverage under the Affordable Care Act saves public funds",
abstract = "Background: The Affordable Care Act (ACA) will expand health care coverage to low-income Americans. Contraception services are a mandated component of ACA plans. Study Design: A decision-Analytic model was developed to compare the costs and outcomes of the current versus the proposed plan for contraceptive coverage (Federal Poverty Level=185{\%} vs. 399{\%}, respectively) over 5 years. The perspective adopted was that of Oregon state insurance providers. The primary outcomes were number of pregnancies averted, health costs and quality adjusted life years (QALYs). Contraceptive failure rates, costs, projected insurance coverage, contraception use and pregnancy outcome data were obtained from the published literature. Sensitivity analyses were performed for all variables. Results: Extending contraceptive coverage both saves money and improves outcomes for Oregon state insurance plan providers. The proposed policy would prevent an additional 72 pregnancies per 1000 women over 5 years. Extending coverage is cost-effective, saving an additional $489 per woman enrolled over 5 years while increasing QALYs. Conclusions: Expanding contraceptive coverage under the Affordable Health Act is cost-effective for Oregon state insurance providers.",
keywords = "Affordable Care Act, Contraception, Cost-effectiveness, Decision analysis",
author = "Suzanne Burlone and Alison Edelman and Aaron Caughey and James Trussell and Stella Dantas and Maria Rodriguez",
year = "2013",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.contraception.2012.06.009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "87",
pages = "143--148",
journal = "Contraception",
issn = "0010-7824",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Extending contraceptive coverage under the Affordable Care Act saves public funds

AU - Burlone, Suzanne

AU - Edelman, Alison

AU - Caughey, Aaron

AU - Trussell, James

AU - Dantas, Stella

AU - Rodriguez, Maria

PY - 2013/2

Y1 - 2013/2

N2 - Background: The Affordable Care Act (ACA) will expand health care coverage to low-income Americans. Contraception services are a mandated component of ACA plans. Study Design: A decision-Analytic model was developed to compare the costs and outcomes of the current versus the proposed plan for contraceptive coverage (Federal Poverty Level=185% vs. 399%, respectively) over 5 years. The perspective adopted was that of Oregon state insurance providers. The primary outcomes were number of pregnancies averted, health costs and quality adjusted life years (QALYs). Contraceptive failure rates, costs, projected insurance coverage, contraception use and pregnancy outcome data were obtained from the published literature. Sensitivity analyses were performed for all variables. Results: Extending contraceptive coverage both saves money and improves outcomes for Oregon state insurance plan providers. The proposed policy would prevent an additional 72 pregnancies per 1000 women over 5 years. Extending coverage is cost-effective, saving an additional $489 per woman enrolled over 5 years while increasing QALYs. Conclusions: Expanding contraceptive coverage under the Affordable Health Act is cost-effective for Oregon state insurance providers.

AB - Background: The Affordable Care Act (ACA) will expand health care coverage to low-income Americans. Contraception services are a mandated component of ACA plans. Study Design: A decision-Analytic model was developed to compare the costs and outcomes of the current versus the proposed plan for contraceptive coverage (Federal Poverty Level=185% vs. 399%, respectively) over 5 years. The perspective adopted was that of Oregon state insurance providers. The primary outcomes were number of pregnancies averted, health costs and quality adjusted life years (QALYs). Contraceptive failure rates, costs, projected insurance coverage, contraception use and pregnancy outcome data were obtained from the published literature. Sensitivity analyses were performed for all variables. Results: Extending contraceptive coverage both saves money and improves outcomes for Oregon state insurance plan providers. The proposed policy would prevent an additional 72 pregnancies per 1000 women over 5 years. Extending coverage is cost-effective, saving an additional $489 per woman enrolled over 5 years while increasing QALYs. Conclusions: Expanding contraceptive coverage under the Affordable Health Act is cost-effective for Oregon state insurance providers.

KW - Affordable Care Act

KW - Contraception

KW - Cost-effectiveness

KW - Decision analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84872163443&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84872163443&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.06.009

DO - 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.06.009

M3 - Article

C2 - 22840280

AN - SCOPUS:84872163443

VL - 87

SP - 143

EP - 148

JO - Contraception

JF - Contraception

SN - 0010-7824

IS - 2

ER -