Expectant management compared with physical examination-indicated cerclage (EM-PEC) in selected women with a dilated cervix at 140/7-256/7 weeks: results from the EM-PEC international cohort study

Leonardo Pereira, Amanda Cotter, Ricardo Gómez, Vincenzo Berghella, Witoon Prasertcharoensuk, Juha Rasanen, Surasith Chaithongwongwatthana, Suneeta Mittal, Sean Daly, Jim Airoldi, Jorge Tolosa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

61 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The objective of the study was to compare pregnancy outcomes in selected women with a dilated cervix who underwent expectant management or physical examination-indicated cerclage. Study Design: This was a historical cohort study conducted by the Global Network for Perinatal and Reproductive Health. Women between 140/7 and 256/7 weeks' gestation with a dilated cervix were identified at 10 centers by ultrasound or digital examination. Primary outcome was time from presentation until delivery (weeks). Secondary outcomes were neonatal survival, birthweight greater than 1500 g and preterm birth less than 28 weeks. Multivariate regression was used to assess the likelihood of neonatal outcomes and control for confounders. Results: Of 225 women, 152 received a physical examination-indicated cerclage, and 73 were managed expectantly without cerclage. Cervical dilation, gestational age at presentation, and antenatal steroid use differed between groups. In the adjusted analyses, cerclage was associated with longer interval from presentation until delivery, improved neonatal survival, birthweight greater than 1500 g and preterm birth less than 28 weeks, compared with expectant management. Similar results were obtained in the analyses limited to women dilated between 2 and 4 cm (n = 122). Conclusion: In this study, the largest cohort reported to date, physical examination-indicated cerclage appears to prolong gestation and improve neonatal survival, compared with expectant management in selected women with cervical dilation between 140/7 and 256/7 weeks. A randomized, controlled trial should be conducted to determine whether these potential benefits outweigh the risks of cerclage placement in this population.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume197
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2007

Fingerprint

Cervix Uteri
Physical Examination
Cohort Studies
Premature Birth
Survival
Dilatation
Pregnancy
Reproductive Health
Pregnancy Outcome
Gestational Age
Randomized Controlled Trials
Steroids
Population

Keywords

  • cerclage
  • premature cervical dilation
  • preterm birth

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Expectant management compared with physical examination-indicated cerclage (EM-PEC) in selected women with a dilated cervix at 140/7-256/7 weeks : results from the EM-PEC international cohort study. / Pereira, Leonardo; Cotter, Amanda; Gómez, Ricardo; Berghella, Vincenzo; Prasertcharoensuk, Witoon; Rasanen, Juha; Chaithongwongwatthana, Surasith; Mittal, Suneeta; Daly, Sean; Airoldi, Jim; Tolosa, Jorge.

In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 197, No. 5, 11.2007.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Pereira, Leonardo ; Cotter, Amanda ; Gómez, Ricardo ; Berghella, Vincenzo ; Prasertcharoensuk, Witoon ; Rasanen, Juha ; Chaithongwongwatthana, Surasith ; Mittal, Suneeta ; Daly, Sean ; Airoldi, Jim ; Tolosa, Jorge. / Expectant management compared with physical examination-indicated cerclage (EM-PEC) in selected women with a dilated cervix at 140/7-256/7 weeks : results from the EM-PEC international cohort study. In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2007 ; Vol. 197, No. 5.
@article{d5444b1d0cdd46a1b93d86ce5c3347d9,
title = "Expectant management compared with physical examination-indicated cerclage (EM-PEC) in selected women with a dilated cervix at 140/7-256/7 weeks: results from the EM-PEC international cohort study",
abstract = "Objective: The objective of the study was to compare pregnancy outcomes in selected women with a dilated cervix who underwent expectant management or physical examination-indicated cerclage. Study Design: This was a historical cohort study conducted by the Global Network for Perinatal and Reproductive Health. Women between 140/7 and 256/7 weeks' gestation with a dilated cervix were identified at 10 centers by ultrasound or digital examination. Primary outcome was time from presentation until delivery (weeks). Secondary outcomes were neonatal survival, birthweight greater than 1500 g and preterm birth less than 28 weeks. Multivariate regression was used to assess the likelihood of neonatal outcomes and control for confounders. Results: Of 225 women, 152 received a physical examination-indicated cerclage, and 73 were managed expectantly without cerclage. Cervical dilation, gestational age at presentation, and antenatal steroid use differed between groups. In the adjusted analyses, cerclage was associated with longer interval from presentation until delivery, improved neonatal survival, birthweight greater than 1500 g and preterm birth less than 28 weeks, compared with expectant management. Similar results were obtained in the analyses limited to women dilated between 2 and 4 cm (n = 122). Conclusion: In this study, the largest cohort reported to date, physical examination-indicated cerclage appears to prolong gestation and improve neonatal survival, compared with expectant management in selected women with cervical dilation between 140/7 and 256/7 weeks. A randomized, controlled trial should be conducted to determine whether these potential benefits outweigh the risks of cerclage placement in this population.",
keywords = "cerclage, premature cervical dilation, preterm birth",
author = "Leonardo Pereira and Amanda Cotter and Ricardo G{\'o}mez and Vincenzo Berghella and Witoon Prasertcharoensuk and Juha Rasanen and Surasith Chaithongwongwatthana and Suneeta Mittal and Sean Daly and Jim Airoldi and Jorge Tolosa",
year = "2007",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajog.2007.05.041",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "197",
journal = "American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0002-9378",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Expectant management compared with physical examination-indicated cerclage (EM-PEC) in selected women with a dilated cervix at 140/7-256/7 weeks

T2 - results from the EM-PEC international cohort study

AU - Pereira, Leonardo

AU - Cotter, Amanda

AU - Gómez, Ricardo

AU - Berghella, Vincenzo

AU - Prasertcharoensuk, Witoon

AU - Rasanen, Juha

AU - Chaithongwongwatthana, Surasith

AU - Mittal, Suneeta

AU - Daly, Sean

AU - Airoldi, Jim

AU - Tolosa, Jorge

PY - 2007/11

Y1 - 2007/11

N2 - Objective: The objective of the study was to compare pregnancy outcomes in selected women with a dilated cervix who underwent expectant management or physical examination-indicated cerclage. Study Design: This was a historical cohort study conducted by the Global Network for Perinatal and Reproductive Health. Women between 140/7 and 256/7 weeks' gestation with a dilated cervix were identified at 10 centers by ultrasound or digital examination. Primary outcome was time from presentation until delivery (weeks). Secondary outcomes were neonatal survival, birthweight greater than 1500 g and preterm birth less than 28 weeks. Multivariate regression was used to assess the likelihood of neonatal outcomes and control for confounders. Results: Of 225 women, 152 received a physical examination-indicated cerclage, and 73 were managed expectantly without cerclage. Cervical dilation, gestational age at presentation, and antenatal steroid use differed between groups. In the adjusted analyses, cerclage was associated with longer interval from presentation until delivery, improved neonatal survival, birthweight greater than 1500 g and preterm birth less than 28 weeks, compared with expectant management. Similar results were obtained in the analyses limited to women dilated between 2 and 4 cm (n = 122). Conclusion: In this study, the largest cohort reported to date, physical examination-indicated cerclage appears to prolong gestation and improve neonatal survival, compared with expectant management in selected women with cervical dilation between 140/7 and 256/7 weeks. A randomized, controlled trial should be conducted to determine whether these potential benefits outweigh the risks of cerclage placement in this population.

AB - Objective: The objective of the study was to compare pregnancy outcomes in selected women with a dilated cervix who underwent expectant management or physical examination-indicated cerclage. Study Design: This was a historical cohort study conducted by the Global Network for Perinatal and Reproductive Health. Women between 140/7 and 256/7 weeks' gestation with a dilated cervix were identified at 10 centers by ultrasound or digital examination. Primary outcome was time from presentation until delivery (weeks). Secondary outcomes were neonatal survival, birthweight greater than 1500 g and preterm birth less than 28 weeks. Multivariate regression was used to assess the likelihood of neonatal outcomes and control for confounders. Results: Of 225 women, 152 received a physical examination-indicated cerclage, and 73 were managed expectantly without cerclage. Cervical dilation, gestational age at presentation, and antenatal steroid use differed between groups. In the adjusted analyses, cerclage was associated with longer interval from presentation until delivery, improved neonatal survival, birthweight greater than 1500 g and preterm birth less than 28 weeks, compared with expectant management. Similar results were obtained in the analyses limited to women dilated between 2 and 4 cm (n = 122). Conclusion: In this study, the largest cohort reported to date, physical examination-indicated cerclage appears to prolong gestation and improve neonatal survival, compared with expectant management in selected women with cervical dilation between 140/7 and 256/7 weeks. A randomized, controlled trial should be conducted to determine whether these potential benefits outweigh the risks of cerclage placement in this population.

KW - cerclage

KW - premature cervical dilation

KW - preterm birth

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=35549008014&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=35549008014&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.05.041

DO - 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.05.041

M3 - Article

C2 - 17980182

AN - SCOPUS:35549008014

VL - 197

JO - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0002-9378

IS - 5

ER -