Expanding the Praxis Debate

Contributions to Clinical Inquiry

Kristin Lutz, Kim Jones, Judy Kendall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Nursing science continues to debate the adequacy of various philosophic paradigms for their ability to forward the discipline. Nursing must embrace multiple paradigms, methodologies, and their philosophic assumptions to adequately address the complex and multifaceted human phenomena that is the focus of clinical inquiry in nursing. This article examines the differences in interpretive and critical approaches to clinical inquiry relative to praxis, expanding how praxis can be used to inform nursing practice. Differences in the nature of knowledge, goals of inquiry, and claims to praxis between the interpretive and critical traditions are discussed. Praxis, realized through clinical inquiry in both the interpretive and the critical paradigms, may contribute important pieces of the puzzle to improve the human condition. Expanding the praxis debate challenges nurses to consider the emancipatory possibilities of clinical inquiry within both interpretive and critical paradigms.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)23-31
Number of pages9
JournalAdvances in Nursing Science
Volume20
Issue number2
StatePublished - Dec 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Nursing
Nurses

Keywords

  • Clinical inquiry
  • Critical inquiry
  • Emancipatory inquiry
  • Hermeneutic inquiry
  • Interpretive inquiry
  • Praxis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)

Cite this

Expanding the Praxis Debate : Contributions to Clinical Inquiry. / Lutz, Kristin; Jones, Kim; Kendall, Judy.

In: Advances in Nursing Science, Vol. 20, No. 2, 12.1997, p. 23-31.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lutz, Kristin ; Jones, Kim ; Kendall, Judy. / Expanding the Praxis Debate : Contributions to Clinical Inquiry. In: Advances in Nursing Science. 1997 ; Vol. 20, No. 2. pp. 23-31.
@article{f86f44e5acd54a9f88b22534b2dbc7c1,
title = "Expanding the Praxis Debate: Contributions to Clinical Inquiry",
abstract = "Nursing science continues to debate the adequacy of various philosophic paradigms for their ability to forward the discipline. Nursing must embrace multiple paradigms, methodologies, and their philosophic assumptions to adequately address the complex and multifaceted human phenomena that is the focus of clinical inquiry in nursing. This article examines the differences in interpretive and critical approaches to clinical inquiry relative to praxis, expanding how praxis can be used to inform nursing practice. Differences in the nature of knowledge, goals of inquiry, and claims to praxis between the interpretive and critical traditions are discussed. Praxis, realized through clinical inquiry in both the interpretive and the critical paradigms, may contribute important pieces of the puzzle to improve the human condition. Expanding the praxis debate challenges nurses to consider the emancipatory possibilities of clinical inquiry within both interpretive and critical paradigms.",
keywords = "Clinical inquiry, Critical inquiry, Emancipatory inquiry, Hermeneutic inquiry, Interpretive inquiry, Praxis",
author = "Kristin Lutz and Kim Jones and Judy Kendall",
year = "1997",
month = "12",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "23--31",
journal = "Advances in Nursing Science",
issn = "0161-9268",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Expanding the Praxis Debate

T2 - Contributions to Clinical Inquiry

AU - Lutz, Kristin

AU - Jones, Kim

AU - Kendall, Judy

PY - 1997/12

Y1 - 1997/12

N2 - Nursing science continues to debate the adequacy of various philosophic paradigms for their ability to forward the discipline. Nursing must embrace multiple paradigms, methodologies, and their philosophic assumptions to adequately address the complex and multifaceted human phenomena that is the focus of clinical inquiry in nursing. This article examines the differences in interpretive and critical approaches to clinical inquiry relative to praxis, expanding how praxis can be used to inform nursing practice. Differences in the nature of knowledge, goals of inquiry, and claims to praxis between the interpretive and critical traditions are discussed. Praxis, realized through clinical inquiry in both the interpretive and the critical paradigms, may contribute important pieces of the puzzle to improve the human condition. Expanding the praxis debate challenges nurses to consider the emancipatory possibilities of clinical inquiry within both interpretive and critical paradigms.

AB - Nursing science continues to debate the adequacy of various philosophic paradigms for their ability to forward the discipline. Nursing must embrace multiple paradigms, methodologies, and their philosophic assumptions to adequately address the complex and multifaceted human phenomena that is the focus of clinical inquiry in nursing. This article examines the differences in interpretive and critical approaches to clinical inquiry relative to praxis, expanding how praxis can be used to inform nursing practice. Differences in the nature of knowledge, goals of inquiry, and claims to praxis between the interpretive and critical traditions are discussed. Praxis, realized through clinical inquiry in both the interpretive and the critical paradigms, may contribute important pieces of the puzzle to improve the human condition. Expanding the praxis debate challenges nurses to consider the emancipatory possibilities of clinical inquiry within both interpretive and critical paradigms.

KW - Clinical inquiry

KW - Critical inquiry

KW - Emancipatory inquiry

KW - Hermeneutic inquiry

KW - Interpretive inquiry

KW - Praxis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031296730&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031296730&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 23

EP - 31

JO - Advances in Nursing Science

JF - Advances in Nursing Science

SN - 0161-9268

IS - 2

ER -