Executive function and intelligence in the resolution of temporary syntactic ambiguity: an individual differences investigation

Paul E. Engelhardt, Joel Nigg, Fernanda Ferreira

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the current study, we examined the role of intelligence and executive functions in the resolution of temporary syntactic ambiguity using an individual differences approach. Data were collected from 174 adolescents and adults who completed a battery of cognitive tests as well as a sentence comprehension task. The critical items for the comprehension task consisted of object/subject garden paths (e.g., While Anna dressed the baby that was small and cute played in the crib), and participants answered a comprehension question (e.g., Did Anna dress the baby?) following each one. Previous studies have shown that garden-path misinterpretations tend to persist into final interpretations. Results showed that both intelligence and processing speed interacted with ambiguity. Individuals with higher intelligence and faster processing were more likely to answer the comprehension questions correctly and, specifically, following ambiguous as opposed to unambiguous sentences. Inhibition produced a marginal effect, but the variance in inhibition was largely shared with intelligence. Conclusions focus on the role of individual differences in cognitive ability and their impact on syntactic ambiguity resolution.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-19
Number of pages19
JournalQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - May 7 2016

Fingerprint

Executive Function
Intelligence
Individuality
Infant Equipment
Aptitude
Inhibition (Psychology)

Keywords

  • Executive function
  • Garden-path sentence
  • Individual differences
  • Intelligence
  • Syntactic ambiguity resolution

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physiology
  • Physiology (medical)
  • Psychology(all)
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology

Cite this

@article{3706c9eff11b48ce904c1933a1b92716,
title = "Executive function and intelligence in the resolution of temporary syntactic ambiguity: an individual differences investigation",
abstract = "In the current study, we examined the role of intelligence and executive functions in the resolution of temporary syntactic ambiguity using an individual differences approach. Data were collected from 174 adolescents and adults who completed a battery of cognitive tests as well as a sentence comprehension task. The critical items for the comprehension task consisted of object/subject garden paths (e.g., While Anna dressed the baby that was small and cute played in the crib), and participants answered a comprehension question (e.g., Did Anna dress the baby?) following each one. Previous studies have shown that garden-path misinterpretations tend to persist into final interpretations. Results showed that both intelligence and processing speed interacted with ambiguity. Individuals with higher intelligence and faster processing were more likely to answer the comprehension questions correctly and, specifically, following ambiguous as opposed to unambiguous sentences. Inhibition produced a marginal effect, but the variance in inhibition was largely shared with intelligence. Conclusions focus on the role of individual differences in cognitive ability and their impact on syntactic ambiguity resolution.",
keywords = "Executive function, Garden-path sentence, Individual differences, Intelligence, Syntactic ambiguity resolution",
author = "Engelhardt, {Paul E.} and Joel Nigg and Fernanda Ferreira",
year = "2016",
month = "5",
day = "7",
doi = "10.1080/17470218.2016.1178785",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--19",
journal = "Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology",
issn = "1747-0218",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Executive function and intelligence in the resolution of temporary syntactic ambiguity

T2 - an individual differences investigation

AU - Engelhardt, Paul E.

AU - Nigg, Joel

AU - Ferreira, Fernanda

PY - 2016/5/7

Y1 - 2016/5/7

N2 - In the current study, we examined the role of intelligence and executive functions in the resolution of temporary syntactic ambiguity using an individual differences approach. Data were collected from 174 adolescents and adults who completed a battery of cognitive tests as well as a sentence comprehension task. The critical items for the comprehension task consisted of object/subject garden paths (e.g., While Anna dressed the baby that was small and cute played in the crib), and participants answered a comprehension question (e.g., Did Anna dress the baby?) following each one. Previous studies have shown that garden-path misinterpretations tend to persist into final interpretations. Results showed that both intelligence and processing speed interacted with ambiguity. Individuals with higher intelligence and faster processing were more likely to answer the comprehension questions correctly and, specifically, following ambiguous as opposed to unambiguous sentences. Inhibition produced a marginal effect, but the variance in inhibition was largely shared with intelligence. Conclusions focus on the role of individual differences in cognitive ability and their impact on syntactic ambiguity resolution.

AB - In the current study, we examined the role of intelligence and executive functions in the resolution of temporary syntactic ambiguity using an individual differences approach. Data were collected from 174 adolescents and adults who completed a battery of cognitive tests as well as a sentence comprehension task. The critical items for the comprehension task consisted of object/subject garden paths (e.g., While Anna dressed the baby that was small and cute played in the crib), and participants answered a comprehension question (e.g., Did Anna dress the baby?) following each one. Previous studies have shown that garden-path misinterpretations tend to persist into final interpretations. Results showed that both intelligence and processing speed interacted with ambiguity. Individuals with higher intelligence and faster processing were more likely to answer the comprehension questions correctly and, specifically, following ambiguous as opposed to unambiguous sentences. Inhibition produced a marginal effect, but the variance in inhibition was largely shared with intelligence. Conclusions focus on the role of individual differences in cognitive ability and their impact on syntactic ambiguity resolution.

KW - Executive function

KW - Garden-path sentence

KW - Individual differences

KW - Intelligence

KW - Syntactic ambiguity resolution

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84965081007&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84965081007&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/17470218.2016.1178785

DO - 10.1080/17470218.2016.1178785

M3 - Article

C2 - 27150661

AN - SCOPUS:84965081007

SP - 1

EP - 19

JO - Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

JF - Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

SN - 1747-0218

ER -