Examining the Latent Structure of the Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System

Justin E. Karr, Scott Hofer, Grant L. Iverson, Mauricio A. Garcia-Barrera

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective The current study aimed to determine whether the Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) taps into three executive function factors (inhibition, shifting, fluency) and to assess the relationship between these factors and tests of executive-related constructs less often measured in latent variable research: reasoning, abstraction, and problem solving. Method Participants included 425 adults from the D-KEFS standardization sample (20-49 years old; 50.1% female; 70.1% White). Eight alternative measurement models were compared based on model fit, with test scores assigned a priori to three factors: inhibition (Color-Word Interference, Tower), shifting (Trail Making, Sorting, Design Fluency), and fluency (Verbal/Design Fluency). The Twenty Questions, Word Context, and Proverb Tests were predicted in separate structural models. Results The three-factor model fit the data well (CFI = 0.938; RMSEA = 0.047), although a two-factor model, with shifting and fluency merged, fit similarly well (CFI = 0.929; RMSEA = 0.048). A bifactor model fit best (CFI = 0.977; RMSEA = 0.032) and explained the most variance in shifting indicators, but rarely converged among 5,000 bootstrapped samples. When the three first-order factors simultaneously predicted the criterion variables, only shifting was uniquely predictive (p <.05; R 2 = 0.246-0.408). The bifactor significantly predicted all three criterion variables (p <.001; R 2 = 0.141-242). Conclusions Results supported a three-factor D-KEFS model (i.e., inhibition, shifting, and fluency), although shifting and fluency were highly related (r = 0.696). The bifactor showed superior fit, but converged less often than other models. Shifting best predicted tests of reasoning, abstraction, and problem solving. These findings support the validity of D-KEFS scores for measuring executive-related constructs and provide a framework through which clinicians can interpret D-KEFS results.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)381-394
Number of pages14
JournalArchives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Volume34
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 7 2019

Fingerprint

Executive Function
Aphorisms and Proverbs
Structural Models
Color
Research
chemotactic factor inactivator
Inhibition (Psychology)

Keywords

  • Assessment
  • Executive functions
  • Test construction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Examining the Latent Structure of the Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System. / Karr, Justin E.; Hofer, Scott; Iverson, Grant L.; Garcia-Barrera, Mauricio A.

In: Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, Vol. 34, No. 3, 07.01.2019, p. 381-394.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Karr, Justin E. ; Hofer, Scott ; Iverson, Grant L. ; Garcia-Barrera, Mauricio A. / Examining the Latent Structure of the Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System. In: Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 2019 ; Vol. 34, No. 3. pp. 381-394.
@article{ce43f01e7b8540e68e840d18097ba5ad,
title = "Examining the Latent Structure of the Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System",
abstract = "Objective The current study aimed to determine whether the Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) taps into three executive function factors (inhibition, shifting, fluency) and to assess the relationship between these factors and tests of executive-related constructs less often measured in latent variable research: reasoning, abstraction, and problem solving. Method Participants included 425 adults from the D-KEFS standardization sample (20-49 years old; 50.1{\%} female; 70.1{\%} White). Eight alternative measurement models were compared based on model fit, with test scores assigned a priori to three factors: inhibition (Color-Word Interference, Tower), shifting (Trail Making, Sorting, Design Fluency), and fluency (Verbal/Design Fluency). The Twenty Questions, Word Context, and Proverb Tests were predicted in separate structural models. Results The three-factor model fit the data well (CFI = 0.938; RMSEA = 0.047), although a two-factor model, with shifting and fluency merged, fit similarly well (CFI = 0.929; RMSEA = 0.048). A bifactor model fit best (CFI = 0.977; RMSEA = 0.032) and explained the most variance in shifting indicators, but rarely converged among 5,000 bootstrapped samples. When the three first-order factors simultaneously predicted the criterion variables, only shifting was uniquely predictive (p <.05; R 2 = 0.246-0.408). The bifactor significantly predicted all three criterion variables (p <.001; R 2 = 0.141-242). Conclusions Results supported a three-factor D-KEFS model (i.e., inhibition, shifting, and fluency), although shifting and fluency were highly related (r = 0.696). The bifactor showed superior fit, but converged less often than other models. Shifting best predicted tests of reasoning, abstraction, and problem solving. These findings support the validity of D-KEFS scores for measuring executive-related constructs and provide a framework through which clinicians can interpret D-KEFS results.",
keywords = "Assessment, Executive functions, Test construction",
author = "Karr, {Justin E.} and Scott Hofer and Iverson, {Grant L.} and Garcia-Barrera, {Mauricio A.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "7",
doi = "10.1093/arclin/acy043",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "381--394",
journal = "Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology",
issn = "0887-6177",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Examining the Latent Structure of the Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System

AU - Karr, Justin E.

AU - Hofer, Scott

AU - Iverson, Grant L.

AU - Garcia-Barrera, Mauricio A.

PY - 2019/1/7

Y1 - 2019/1/7

N2 - Objective The current study aimed to determine whether the Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) taps into three executive function factors (inhibition, shifting, fluency) and to assess the relationship between these factors and tests of executive-related constructs less often measured in latent variable research: reasoning, abstraction, and problem solving. Method Participants included 425 adults from the D-KEFS standardization sample (20-49 years old; 50.1% female; 70.1% White). Eight alternative measurement models were compared based on model fit, with test scores assigned a priori to three factors: inhibition (Color-Word Interference, Tower), shifting (Trail Making, Sorting, Design Fluency), and fluency (Verbal/Design Fluency). The Twenty Questions, Word Context, and Proverb Tests were predicted in separate structural models. Results The three-factor model fit the data well (CFI = 0.938; RMSEA = 0.047), although a two-factor model, with shifting and fluency merged, fit similarly well (CFI = 0.929; RMSEA = 0.048). A bifactor model fit best (CFI = 0.977; RMSEA = 0.032) and explained the most variance in shifting indicators, but rarely converged among 5,000 bootstrapped samples. When the three first-order factors simultaneously predicted the criterion variables, only shifting was uniquely predictive (p <.05; R 2 = 0.246-0.408). The bifactor significantly predicted all three criterion variables (p <.001; R 2 = 0.141-242). Conclusions Results supported a three-factor D-KEFS model (i.e., inhibition, shifting, and fluency), although shifting and fluency were highly related (r = 0.696). The bifactor showed superior fit, but converged less often than other models. Shifting best predicted tests of reasoning, abstraction, and problem solving. These findings support the validity of D-KEFS scores for measuring executive-related constructs and provide a framework through which clinicians can interpret D-KEFS results.

AB - Objective The current study aimed to determine whether the Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) taps into three executive function factors (inhibition, shifting, fluency) and to assess the relationship between these factors and tests of executive-related constructs less often measured in latent variable research: reasoning, abstraction, and problem solving. Method Participants included 425 adults from the D-KEFS standardization sample (20-49 years old; 50.1% female; 70.1% White). Eight alternative measurement models were compared based on model fit, with test scores assigned a priori to three factors: inhibition (Color-Word Interference, Tower), shifting (Trail Making, Sorting, Design Fluency), and fluency (Verbal/Design Fluency). The Twenty Questions, Word Context, and Proverb Tests were predicted in separate structural models. Results The three-factor model fit the data well (CFI = 0.938; RMSEA = 0.047), although a two-factor model, with shifting and fluency merged, fit similarly well (CFI = 0.929; RMSEA = 0.048). A bifactor model fit best (CFI = 0.977; RMSEA = 0.032) and explained the most variance in shifting indicators, but rarely converged among 5,000 bootstrapped samples. When the three first-order factors simultaneously predicted the criterion variables, only shifting was uniquely predictive (p <.05; R 2 = 0.246-0.408). The bifactor significantly predicted all three criterion variables (p <.001; R 2 = 0.141-242). Conclusions Results supported a three-factor D-KEFS model (i.e., inhibition, shifting, and fluency), although shifting and fluency were highly related (r = 0.696). The bifactor showed superior fit, but converged less often than other models. Shifting best predicted tests of reasoning, abstraction, and problem solving. These findings support the validity of D-KEFS scores for measuring executive-related constructs and provide a framework through which clinicians can interpret D-KEFS results.

KW - Assessment

KW - Executive functions

KW - Test construction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058362577&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85058362577&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/arclin/acy043

DO - 10.1093/arclin/acy043

M3 - Article

C2 - 29733343

AN - SCOPUS:85058362577

VL - 34

SP - 381

EP - 394

JO - Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology

JF - Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology

SN - 0887-6177

IS - 3

ER -