Examining Functional Content in Widely Used Health-Related Quality of Life Scales

Trevor Hall, Gloria L. Krahn, Willi Horner-Johnson, Gordon Lamb

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Assess extent to which generic Quality of Life (QOL) and Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) scales include function in assessment of health, and identify health assessment items that are free of functional content. Methods: An expert panel on measurement of health and disability reached consensus on definitions of health, disability, and function. They assessed all items of all generic (non-condition-specific) scales in the 2006 ProQolid database for being important to measuring health as distinct from function. Ratings were summarized as content validity ratios. Retained items were written into standard format and reviewed again by the expert panel and a validity panel with expertise in specific disabilities. Results: Of 85 scales, 21 were retained as containing items important for assessing health. Scales ranged from 100% (BRFSS HRQOL, WHO-5) to only 4% of items rated as important. In further review of "important" items, functional content was identified in many of the items, particularly with regard to mental functioning. Conclusions: Popular generic scales of QOL and HRQOL vary greatly in the degree to which they include content on function. A pool of items can be identified that are relatively free of function. Distinguishing measurement of function and health is particularly important for people with long-standing functional limitations and for assessing the relationship of health with function.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)94-99
Number of pages6
JournalRehabilitation Psychology
Volume56
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2011

Fingerprint

Quality of Life
Health
Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
Databases

Keywords

  • Bias
  • Disability
  • Function
  • Health status
  • Health-related quality of life
  • Measurement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

Examining Functional Content in Widely Used Health-Related Quality of Life Scales. / Hall, Trevor; Krahn, Gloria L.; Horner-Johnson, Willi; Lamb, Gordon.

In: Rehabilitation Psychology, Vol. 56, No. 2, 05.2011, p. 94-99.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a7c33f91ed104e7a80866cca98e0e90d,
title = "Examining Functional Content in Widely Used Health-Related Quality of Life Scales",
abstract = "Purpose: Assess extent to which generic Quality of Life (QOL) and Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) scales include function in assessment of health, and identify health assessment items that are free of functional content. Methods: An expert panel on measurement of health and disability reached consensus on definitions of health, disability, and function. They assessed all items of all generic (non-condition-specific) scales in the 2006 ProQolid database for being important to measuring health as distinct from function. Ratings were summarized as content validity ratios. Retained items were written into standard format and reviewed again by the expert panel and a validity panel with expertise in specific disabilities. Results: Of 85 scales, 21 were retained as containing items important for assessing health. Scales ranged from 100{\%} (BRFSS HRQOL, WHO-5) to only 4{\%} of items rated as important. In further review of {"}important{"} items, functional content was identified in many of the items, particularly with regard to mental functioning. Conclusions: Popular generic scales of QOL and HRQOL vary greatly in the degree to which they include content on function. A pool of items can be identified that are relatively free of function. Distinguishing measurement of function and health is particularly important for people with long-standing functional limitations and for assessing the relationship of health with function.",
keywords = "Bias, Disability, Function, Health status, Health-related quality of life, Measurement",
author = "Trevor Hall and Krahn, {Gloria L.} and Willi Horner-Johnson and Gordon Lamb",
year = "2011",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1037/a0023054",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "56",
pages = "94--99",
journal = "Rehabilitation Psychology",
issn = "0090-5550",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Examining Functional Content in Widely Used Health-Related Quality of Life Scales

AU - Hall, Trevor

AU - Krahn, Gloria L.

AU - Horner-Johnson, Willi

AU - Lamb, Gordon

PY - 2011/5

Y1 - 2011/5

N2 - Purpose: Assess extent to which generic Quality of Life (QOL) and Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) scales include function in assessment of health, and identify health assessment items that are free of functional content. Methods: An expert panel on measurement of health and disability reached consensus on definitions of health, disability, and function. They assessed all items of all generic (non-condition-specific) scales in the 2006 ProQolid database for being important to measuring health as distinct from function. Ratings were summarized as content validity ratios. Retained items were written into standard format and reviewed again by the expert panel and a validity panel with expertise in specific disabilities. Results: Of 85 scales, 21 were retained as containing items important for assessing health. Scales ranged from 100% (BRFSS HRQOL, WHO-5) to only 4% of items rated as important. In further review of "important" items, functional content was identified in many of the items, particularly with regard to mental functioning. Conclusions: Popular generic scales of QOL and HRQOL vary greatly in the degree to which they include content on function. A pool of items can be identified that are relatively free of function. Distinguishing measurement of function and health is particularly important for people with long-standing functional limitations and for assessing the relationship of health with function.

AB - Purpose: Assess extent to which generic Quality of Life (QOL) and Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) scales include function in assessment of health, and identify health assessment items that are free of functional content. Methods: An expert panel on measurement of health and disability reached consensus on definitions of health, disability, and function. They assessed all items of all generic (non-condition-specific) scales in the 2006 ProQolid database for being important to measuring health as distinct from function. Ratings were summarized as content validity ratios. Retained items were written into standard format and reviewed again by the expert panel and a validity panel with expertise in specific disabilities. Results: Of 85 scales, 21 were retained as containing items important for assessing health. Scales ranged from 100% (BRFSS HRQOL, WHO-5) to only 4% of items rated as important. In further review of "important" items, functional content was identified in many of the items, particularly with regard to mental functioning. Conclusions: Popular generic scales of QOL and HRQOL vary greatly in the degree to which they include content on function. A pool of items can be identified that are relatively free of function. Distinguishing measurement of function and health is particularly important for people with long-standing functional limitations and for assessing the relationship of health with function.

KW - Bias

KW - Disability

KW - Function

KW - Health status

KW - Health-related quality of life

KW - Measurement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79956227361&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79956227361&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0023054

DO - 10.1037/a0023054

M3 - Article

C2 - 21574727

AN - SCOPUS:79956227361

VL - 56

SP - 94

EP - 99

JO - Rehabilitation Psychology

JF - Rehabilitation Psychology

SN - 0090-5550

IS - 2

ER -