Evidence, quality, and waste: Solving the value equation in neonatology

Dmitry Dukhovny, Dewayne M. Pursley, Haresh M. Kirpalani, Jeffrey H. Horbar, John A.F. Zupancic

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

37 Scopus citations


Rising health care costs challenge governments, payers, and providers in delivering health care services. Tremendous pressures result to deliver better quality care while simultaneously reducing costs. This has led to a wholesale re-examination of current practice methods, including explicit consideration of efficiency and waste. Traditionally, reductions in the costs of care have been considered as independent, and sometimes even antithetical, to the practice of high-quality, intensive medicine. However, it is evident that provision of evidence-based, locally relevant care can result in improved outcomes, lower resource utilization, and opportunities to reallocate resources. This is particularly relevant to the practice of neonatology. In the United States, 12% of the annual birth cohort is affected by preterm birth, and 3% is affected by congenital anomalies. Both of these conditions are associated with costly health care during, and often long after, the NICU admission. We will discuss how 3 drivers of clinical practice in neonatal care (evidence-based medicine, evidence-based economics, and quality improvement) can together optimize clinical and fiscal outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere20150312
Issue number3
StatePublished - Mar 2016

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health


Dive into the research topics of 'Evidence, quality, and waste: Solving the value equation in neonatology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this