Evaluation of three bacteriuria screening methods in a clinical research hospital

T. C. Wu, E. C. Williams, S. Y. Koo, James Maclowry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In a study conducted to compare three screening methods for their ability to detect significant bacteriuria, 2,815 urine specimens were screened by Chemstrip LN (BioDynamics, Division of Boehringer Mannheim Chemicals, Indianapolis, Ind.), 1,000 were screened by Bac-T-Screen (Marion Scientific Laboratory, Kansas City, Mo.), and 289 were screened by ATP assay (Turner Designs, Mountain View, Calif.). Results were compared with those obtained by quantitative culture plate method. The ATP assay showed the highest sensitivity (91%) compared with the Bac-T-Screen (67%) and Chemstrip LN (50%) test but had the lowest specificity (64%) compared with the Bac-T-Screen (83%) and Chemstrip LN (91%). In 101 leukopenic patients with significant bacteriuria, the Bac-T-Screen test showed a higher sensitivity (33% at 104 to 105 CFU/ml and 80% at ≥105 CFU/ml). It is concluded from this study that none of the three methods are sufficiently sensitive for the clinical research patients in this institution.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)796-799
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Clinical Microbiology
Volume21
Issue number5
StatePublished - 1985
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Bacteriuria
Adenosine Triphosphate
Research
Urine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Microbiology
  • Microbiology (medical)

Cite this

Evaluation of three bacteriuria screening methods in a clinical research hospital. / Wu, T. C.; Williams, E. C.; Koo, S. Y.; Maclowry, James.

In: Journal of Clinical Microbiology, Vol. 21, No. 5, 1985, p. 796-799.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{57e717f5b3094004896fd53fd2ecd9e4,
title = "Evaluation of three bacteriuria screening methods in a clinical research hospital",
abstract = "In a study conducted to compare three screening methods for their ability to detect significant bacteriuria, 2,815 urine specimens were screened by Chemstrip LN (BioDynamics, Division of Boehringer Mannheim Chemicals, Indianapolis, Ind.), 1,000 were screened by Bac-T-Screen (Marion Scientific Laboratory, Kansas City, Mo.), and 289 were screened by ATP assay (Turner Designs, Mountain View, Calif.). Results were compared with those obtained by quantitative culture plate method. The ATP assay showed the highest sensitivity (91{\%}) compared with the Bac-T-Screen (67{\%}) and Chemstrip LN (50{\%}) test but had the lowest specificity (64{\%}) compared with the Bac-T-Screen (83{\%}) and Chemstrip LN (91{\%}). In 101 leukopenic patients with significant bacteriuria, the Bac-T-Screen test showed a higher sensitivity (33{\%} at 104 to 105 CFU/ml and 80{\%} at ≥105 CFU/ml). It is concluded from this study that none of the three methods are sufficiently sensitive for the clinical research patients in this institution.",
author = "Wu, {T. C.} and Williams, {E. C.} and Koo, {S. Y.} and James Maclowry",
year = "1985",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "796--799",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Microbiology",
issn = "0095-1137",
publisher = "American Society for Microbiology",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of three bacteriuria screening methods in a clinical research hospital

AU - Wu, T. C.

AU - Williams, E. C.

AU - Koo, S. Y.

AU - Maclowry, James

PY - 1985

Y1 - 1985

N2 - In a study conducted to compare three screening methods for their ability to detect significant bacteriuria, 2,815 urine specimens were screened by Chemstrip LN (BioDynamics, Division of Boehringer Mannheim Chemicals, Indianapolis, Ind.), 1,000 were screened by Bac-T-Screen (Marion Scientific Laboratory, Kansas City, Mo.), and 289 were screened by ATP assay (Turner Designs, Mountain View, Calif.). Results were compared with those obtained by quantitative culture plate method. The ATP assay showed the highest sensitivity (91%) compared with the Bac-T-Screen (67%) and Chemstrip LN (50%) test but had the lowest specificity (64%) compared with the Bac-T-Screen (83%) and Chemstrip LN (91%). In 101 leukopenic patients with significant bacteriuria, the Bac-T-Screen test showed a higher sensitivity (33% at 104 to 105 CFU/ml and 80% at ≥105 CFU/ml). It is concluded from this study that none of the three methods are sufficiently sensitive for the clinical research patients in this institution.

AB - In a study conducted to compare three screening methods for their ability to detect significant bacteriuria, 2,815 urine specimens were screened by Chemstrip LN (BioDynamics, Division of Boehringer Mannheim Chemicals, Indianapolis, Ind.), 1,000 were screened by Bac-T-Screen (Marion Scientific Laboratory, Kansas City, Mo.), and 289 were screened by ATP assay (Turner Designs, Mountain View, Calif.). Results were compared with those obtained by quantitative culture plate method. The ATP assay showed the highest sensitivity (91%) compared with the Bac-T-Screen (67%) and Chemstrip LN (50%) test but had the lowest specificity (64%) compared with the Bac-T-Screen (83%) and Chemstrip LN (91%). In 101 leukopenic patients with significant bacteriuria, the Bac-T-Screen test showed a higher sensitivity (33% at 104 to 105 CFU/ml and 80% at ≥105 CFU/ml). It is concluded from this study that none of the three methods are sufficiently sensitive for the clinical research patients in this institution.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0021959061&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0021959061&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 3998113

AN - SCOPUS:0021959061

VL - 21

SP - 796

EP - 799

JO - Journal of Clinical Microbiology

JF - Journal of Clinical Microbiology

SN - 0095-1137

IS - 5

ER -