Evaluation of the generalizability (reliability and validity) of analog functional assessment methodology

Cynthia M. Anderson, Kurt Freeman, Joseph R. Scotti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The reliability and validity of analog functional assessment methodology in developing hypotheses about the variables maintaining excess behavior was evaluated within the context of generalizability theory and the Behavioral Assessment Grid. Three children with developmental disabilities who exhibited excess behavior participated. Two complete analog and contingency reversal assessments were conducted to evaluate the reliability (temporal and setting generalizability) of the methodology. Treatment validity was evaluated by conducting contingency reversals in all analog conditions, during which all targeted excess behaviors were ignored and programmed consequences were delivered following the occurrence of alternative behaviors. Results suggest that the analog assessments were both a reliable and valid methodology for all three of the participants. Implications for the future application of analog assessment are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)31-50
Number of pages20
JournalBehavior Therapy
Volume30
Issue number1
StatePublished - Dec 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Reproducibility of Results
Developmental Disabilities
Disabled Children
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

Evaluation of the generalizability (reliability and validity) of analog functional assessment methodology. / Anderson, Cynthia M.; Freeman, Kurt; Scotti, Joseph R.

In: Behavior Therapy, Vol. 30, No. 1, 12.1999, p. 31-50.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8a6b87f454ba42fea0ae9779f46e0ef1,
title = "Evaluation of the generalizability (reliability and validity) of analog functional assessment methodology",
abstract = "The reliability and validity of analog functional assessment methodology in developing hypotheses about the variables maintaining excess behavior was evaluated within the context of generalizability theory and the Behavioral Assessment Grid. Three children with developmental disabilities who exhibited excess behavior participated. Two complete analog and contingency reversal assessments were conducted to evaluate the reliability (temporal and setting generalizability) of the methodology. Treatment validity was evaluated by conducting contingency reversals in all analog conditions, during which all targeted excess behaviors were ignored and programmed consequences were delivered following the occurrence of alternative behaviors. Results suggest that the analog assessments were both a reliable and valid methodology for all three of the participants. Implications for the future application of analog assessment are discussed.",
author = "Anderson, {Cynthia M.} and Kurt Freeman and Scotti, {Joseph R.}",
year = "1999",
month = "12",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "31--50",
journal = "Behavior Therapy",
issn = "0005-7894",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of the generalizability (reliability and validity) of analog functional assessment methodology

AU - Anderson, Cynthia M.

AU - Freeman, Kurt

AU - Scotti, Joseph R.

PY - 1999/12

Y1 - 1999/12

N2 - The reliability and validity of analog functional assessment methodology in developing hypotheses about the variables maintaining excess behavior was evaluated within the context of generalizability theory and the Behavioral Assessment Grid. Three children with developmental disabilities who exhibited excess behavior participated. Two complete analog and contingency reversal assessments were conducted to evaluate the reliability (temporal and setting generalizability) of the methodology. Treatment validity was evaluated by conducting contingency reversals in all analog conditions, during which all targeted excess behaviors were ignored and programmed consequences were delivered following the occurrence of alternative behaviors. Results suggest that the analog assessments were both a reliable and valid methodology for all three of the participants. Implications for the future application of analog assessment are discussed.

AB - The reliability and validity of analog functional assessment methodology in developing hypotheses about the variables maintaining excess behavior was evaluated within the context of generalizability theory and the Behavioral Assessment Grid. Three children with developmental disabilities who exhibited excess behavior participated. Two complete analog and contingency reversal assessments were conducted to evaluate the reliability (temporal and setting generalizability) of the methodology. Treatment validity was evaluated by conducting contingency reversals in all analog conditions, during which all targeted excess behaviors were ignored and programmed consequences were delivered following the occurrence of alternative behaviors. Results suggest that the analog assessments were both a reliable and valid methodology for all three of the participants. Implications for the future application of analog assessment are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032989985&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032989985&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 31

EP - 50

JO - Behavior Therapy

JF - Behavior Therapy

SN - 0005-7894

IS - 1

ER -