Evaluation of the generalizability (reliability and validity) of analog functional assessment methodology

Cynthia M. Anderson, Kurt A. Freeman, Joseph R. Scotti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Scopus citations

Abstract

The reliability and validity of analog functional assessment methodology in developing hypotheses about the variables maintaining excess behavior was evaluated within the context of generalizability theory and the Behavioral Assessment Grid. Three children with developmental disabilities who exhibited excess behavior participated. Two complete analog and contingency reversal assessments were conducted to evaluate the reliability (temporal and setting generalizability) of the methodology. Treatment validity was evaluated by conducting contingency reversals in all analog conditions, during which all targeted excess behaviors were ignored and programmed consequences were delivered following the occurrence of alternative behaviors. Results suggest that the analog assessments were both a reliable and valid methodology for all three of the participants. Implications for the future application of analog assessment are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)31-50
Number of pages20
JournalBehavior Therapy
Volume30
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1999

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of the generalizability (reliability and validity) of analog functional assessment methodology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this