Evaluation of the Brief Adjustment Scale-6 (BASE-6): A Measure of General Psychological Adjustment for Measurement-Based Care

Rick A. Cruz, A. Paige Peterson, Corey Fagan, Whitney Black, Lee Cooper

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The current study evaluated the Brief Adjustment Scale-6 (BASE-6), a measure of general psychological adjustment. The psychometric properties of the BASE-6 are documented using 3 adult samples, including online participants (Sample 1: n = 459), college students (Sample 2: n = 244), and a clinical sample (Sample 3: n = 296). Acceptability ratings comparing the BASE-6 to the Outcome Questionnaire- 45.2 (OQ-45.2; Lambert et al., 1996) are provided. Factor analyses showed the items were well represented by a single factor, indicating a unidimensional factor structure. The BASE-6 demonstrated good internal consistency (α = .87-.93) and there was good test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation = .77) across 1 week. In Samples 1 and 2, there was moderate to high convergent validity with the OQ-45.2 total score (r = .66 -.81, p < .001), and Symptom Distress (r = .66 -.80, p < .001), Interpersonal (r = .54 -.68, p < .001), and Social Role (r = .57-.69, p < .001) subscales. In Sample 3, there was high convergent validity with the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (r = .80, p < .001) and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (r = .76, p < .001). BASE-6 item and total scores were generally higher in the clinical sample compared with the nonclinical samples. Participants perceived the BASE-6 as easier to use, and more acceptable on a weekly basis compared with the OQ-45.2. Results provide preliminary evidence that the BASE-6 has acceptable psychometric properties and may show promise in the context of measurement-based care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalPsychological Services
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Social Adjustment
Psychometrics
Emotional Adjustment
Anxiety Disorders
Reproducibility of Results
Statistical Factor Analysis
Students
Health

Keywords

  • Assessment
  • Measurement-based care
  • Psychological adjustment
  • Psychometrics
  • Routine outcome monitoring

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

Evaluation of the Brief Adjustment Scale-6 (BASE-6) : A Measure of General Psychological Adjustment for Measurement-Based Care. / Cruz, Rick A.; Peterson, A. Paige; Fagan, Corey; Black, Whitney; Cooper, Lee.

In: Psychological Services, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f371d0bb699a449a9b8c6de15653de0e,
title = "Evaluation of the Brief Adjustment Scale-6 (BASE-6): A Measure of General Psychological Adjustment for Measurement-Based Care",
abstract = "The current study evaluated the Brief Adjustment Scale-6 (BASE-6), a measure of general psychological adjustment. The psychometric properties of the BASE-6 are documented using 3 adult samples, including online participants (Sample 1: n = 459), college students (Sample 2: n = 244), and a clinical sample (Sample 3: n = 296). Acceptability ratings comparing the BASE-6 to the Outcome Questionnaire- 45.2 (OQ-45.2; Lambert et al., 1996) are provided. Factor analyses showed the items were well represented by a single factor, indicating a unidimensional factor structure. The BASE-6 demonstrated good internal consistency (α = .87-.93) and there was good test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation = .77) across 1 week. In Samples 1 and 2, there was moderate to high convergent validity with the OQ-45.2 total score (r = .66 -.81, p < .001), and Symptom Distress (r = .66 -.80, p < .001), Interpersonal (r = .54 -.68, p < .001), and Social Role (r = .57-.69, p < .001) subscales. In Sample 3, there was high convergent validity with the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (r = .80, p < .001) and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (r = .76, p < .001). BASE-6 item and total scores were generally higher in the clinical sample compared with the nonclinical samples. Participants perceived the BASE-6 as easier to use, and more acceptable on a weekly basis compared with the OQ-45.2. Results provide preliminary evidence that the BASE-6 has acceptable psychometric properties and may show promise in the context of measurement-based care.",
keywords = "Assessment, Measurement-based care, Psychological adjustment, Psychometrics, Routine outcome monitoring",
author = "Cruz, {Rick A.} and Peterson, {A. Paige} and Corey Fagan and Whitney Black and Lee Cooper",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/ser0000366",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Psychological Services",
issn = "1541-1559",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of the Brief Adjustment Scale-6 (BASE-6)

T2 - A Measure of General Psychological Adjustment for Measurement-Based Care

AU - Cruz, Rick A.

AU - Peterson, A. Paige

AU - Fagan, Corey

AU - Black, Whitney

AU - Cooper, Lee

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - The current study evaluated the Brief Adjustment Scale-6 (BASE-6), a measure of general psychological adjustment. The psychometric properties of the BASE-6 are documented using 3 adult samples, including online participants (Sample 1: n = 459), college students (Sample 2: n = 244), and a clinical sample (Sample 3: n = 296). Acceptability ratings comparing the BASE-6 to the Outcome Questionnaire- 45.2 (OQ-45.2; Lambert et al., 1996) are provided. Factor analyses showed the items were well represented by a single factor, indicating a unidimensional factor structure. The BASE-6 demonstrated good internal consistency (α = .87-.93) and there was good test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation = .77) across 1 week. In Samples 1 and 2, there was moderate to high convergent validity with the OQ-45.2 total score (r = .66 -.81, p < .001), and Symptom Distress (r = .66 -.80, p < .001), Interpersonal (r = .54 -.68, p < .001), and Social Role (r = .57-.69, p < .001) subscales. In Sample 3, there was high convergent validity with the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (r = .80, p < .001) and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (r = .76, p < .001). BASE-6 item and total scores were generally higher in the clinical sample compared with the nonclinical samples. Participants perceived the BASE-6 as easier to use, and more acceptable on a weekly basis compared with the OQ-45.2. Results provide preliminary evidence that the BASE-6 has acceptable psychometric properties and may show promise in the context of measurement-based care.

AB - The current study evaluated the Brief Adjustment Scale-6 (BASE-6), a measure of general psychological adjustment. The psychometric properties of the BASE-6 are documented using 3 adult samples, including online participants (Sample 1: n = 459), college students (Sample 2: n = 244), and a clinical sample (Sample 3: n = 296). Acceptability ratings comparing the BASE-6 to the Outcome Questionnaire- 45.2 (OQ-45.2; Lambert et al., 1996) are provided. Factor analyses showed the items were well represented by a single factor, indicating a unidimensional factor structure. The BASE-6 demonstrated good internal consistency (α = .87-.93) and there was good test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation = .77) across 1 week. In Samples 1 and 2, there was moderate to high convergent validity with the OQ-45.2 total score (r = .66 -.81, p < .001), and Symptom Distress (r = .66 -.80, p < .001), Interpersonal (r = .54 -.68, p < .001), and Social Role (r = .57-.69, p < .001) subscales. In Sample 3, there was high convergent validity with the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (r = .80, p < .001) and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (r = .76, p < .001). BASE-6 item and total scores were generally higher in the clinical sample compared with the nonclinical samples. Participants perceived the BASE-6 as easier to use, and more acceptable on a weekly basis compared with the OQ-45.2. Results provide preliminary evidence that the BASE-6 has acceptable psychometric properties and may show promise in the context of measurement-based care.

KW - Assessment

KW - Measurement-based care

KW - Psychological adjustment

KW - Psychometrics

KW - Routine outcome monitoring

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067085810&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067085810&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/ser0000366

DO - 10.1037/ser0000366

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85067085810

JO - Psychological Services

JF - Psychological Services

SN - 1541-1559

ER -