Evaluation of reliability in the use of endoscopic terminology

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Variability in the reporting of gastrointestinal endoscopic findings may affect the validity of analyses of data collected from clinical reports of those findings. In this project, images of 10 endoscopic findings were collected from the data repository of the Clinical Outcomes Research Initiative (CORI), all of which had been described by the reporting endoscopist. These images were presented to 52 experienced endoscopists recruited from the clinical affiliates of CORI who were asked to assign each a term from the Minimal Standard Terminology for Digestive Endoscopy. Proportion of agreement with the endoscopist varied by finding from 84.3% to 51.0% (overall 67.6% with 95% CI 63.4-71.8%). Proportion of agreement among the subjects varied by finding from 76.3% to 38.5%. (overall 55.6% with 95% CI 52.4-58.8%). Possible reasons for this lack of agreement are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationStudies in Health Technology and Informatics
Pages396-400
Number of pages5
Volume107
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2004

    Fingerprint

Keywords

  • Databases
  • Endoscopy
  • factual
  • gastrointestinal
  • Terminology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Health Informatics
  • Health Information Management

Cite this

Logan, J. J., McCashland, T., & Lieberman, D. (2004). Evaluation of reliability in the use of endoscopic terminology. In Studies in Health Technology and Informatics (Vol. 107, pp. 396-400) https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-60750-949-3-396