Evaluation of multimedia medication reconciliation software: A randomized controlled, single-blind trial to measure diagnostic accuracy for discrepancy detection

Blake J. Lesselroth, Kathleen Adams, Victoria L. Church, Stephanie Tallett, Yelizaveta Russ, Jack Wiedrick, Christopher Forsberg, David Dorr

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background The Veterans Affairs Portland Healthcare System developed a medication history collection software that displays prescription names and medication images. Objective This article measures the frequency of medication discrepancy reporting using the medication history collection software and compares with the frequency of reporting using a paper-based process. This article also determines the accuracy of each method by comparing both strategies to a best possible medication history. Study Design Randomized, controlled, single-blind trial. Setting Three community-based primary care clinics associated with the Veterans Affairs Portland Healthcare System: a 300-bed teaching facility and ambulatory care network serving Veteran soldiers in the Pacific Northwest United States. Participants Of 212 patients with primary care appointments, 209 patients fulfilled the study requirements. Intervention Patients randomized to a software-directed medication history or a paper-based medication history. Randomization and allocation to treatment groups were performed using a computer-based random number generator. Assignments were placed in a sealed envelope and opened after participant consent. The research coordinator did not know or have access to the treatment assignment until the time of presentation. Main Outcome Measures The primary analysis compared the discrepancy detection rates between groups with respect to the health record and a best possible medication history.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)285-301
Number of pages17
JournalApplied Clinical Informatics
Volume9
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2018

Fingerprint

Medication Reconciliation
Multimedia
Veterans
Teaching
Software
Health
Primary Health Care
Northwestern United States
Delivery of Health Care
Military Personnel
Random Allocation
Ambulatory Care Facilities
Names
Prescriptions
Appointments and Schedules
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Therapeutics
Research

Keywords

  • Clinical informatics
  • Clinical information systems
  • Consumer health informatics
  • Medication adherence
  • Medication errors
  • Medication reconciliation
  • Medication review
  • Quality improvement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Informatics
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Health Information Management

Cite this

Evaluation of multimedia medication reconciliation software : A randomized controlled, single-blind trial to measure diagnostic accuracy for discrepancy detection. / Lesselroth, Blake J.; Adams, Kathleen; Church, Victoria L.; Tallett, Stephanie; Russ, Yelizaveta; Wiedrick, Jack; Forsberg, Christopher; Dorr, David.

In: Applied Clinical Informatics, Vol. 9, No. 2, 01.04.2018, p. 285-301.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lesselroth, Blake J. ; Adams, Kathleen ; Church, Victoria L. ; Tallett, Stephanie ; Russ, Yelizaveta ; Wiedrick, Jack ; Forsberg, Christopher ; Dorr, David. / Evaluation of multimedia medication reconciliation software : A randomized controlled, single-blind trial to measure diagnostic accuracy for discrepancy detection. In: Applied Clinical Informatics. 2018 ; Vol. 9, No. 2. pp. 285-301.
@article{a80c7997655c4628b497265ce7af9cbd,
title = "Evaluation of multimedia medication reconciliation software: A randomized controlled, single-blind trial to measure diagnostic accuracy for discrepancy detection",
abstract = "Background The Veterans Affairs Portland Healthcare System developed a medication history collection software that displays prescription names and medication images. Objective This article measures the frequency of medication discrepancy reporting using the medication history collection software and compares with the frequency of reporting using a paper-based process. This article also determines the accuracy of each method by comparing both strategies to a best possible medication history. Study Design Randomized, controlled, single-blind trial. Setting Three community-based primary care clinics associated with the Veterans Affairs Portland Healthcare System: a 300-bed teaching facility and ambulatory care network serving Veteran soldiers in the Pacific Northwest United States. Participants Of 212 patients with primary care appointments, 209 patients fulfilled the study requirements. Intervention Patients randomized to a software-directed medication history or a paper-based medication history. Randomization and allocation to treatment groups were performed using a computer-based random number generator. Assignments were placed in a sealed envelope and opened after participant consent. The research coordinator did not know or have access to the treatment assignment until the time of presentation. Main Outcome Measures The primary analysis compared the discrepancy detection rates between groups with respect to the health record and a best possible medication history.",
keywords = "Clinical informatics, Clinical information systems, Consumer health informatics, Medication adherence, Medication errors, Medication reconciliation, Medication review, Quality improvement",
author = "Lesselroth, {Blake J.} and Kathleen Adams and Church, {Victoria L.} and Stephanie Tallett and Yelizaveta Russ and Jack Wiedrick and Christopher Forsberg and David Dorr",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1055/s-0038-1645889",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "285--301",
journal = "Applied Clinical Informatics",
issn = "1869-0327",
publisher = "Schattauer GmbH",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of multimedia medication reconciliation software

T2 - A randomized controlled, single-blind trial to measure diagnostic accuracy for discrepancy detection

AU - Lesselroth, Blake J.

AU - Adams, Kathleen

AU - Church, Victoria L.

AU - Tallett, Stephanie

AU - Russ, Yelizaveta

AU - Wiedrick, Jack

AU - Forsberg, Christopher

AU - Dorr, David

PY - 2018/4/1

Y1 - 2018/4/1

N2 - Background The Veterans Affairs Portland Healthcare System developed a medication history collection software that displays prescription names and medication images. Objective This article measures the frequency of medication discrepancy reporting using the medication history collection software and compares with the frequency of reporting using a paper-based process. This article also determines the accuracy of each method by comparing both strategies to a best possible medication history. Study Design Randomized, controlled, single-blind trial. Setting Three community-based primary care clinics associated with the Veterans Affairs Portland Healthcare System: a 300-bed teaching facility and ambulatory care network serving Veteran soldiers in the Pacific Northwest United States. Participants Of 212 patients with primary care appointments, 209 patients fulfilled the study requirements. Intervention Patients randomized to a software-directed medication history or a paper-based medication history. Randomization and allocation to treatment groups were performed using a computer-based random number generator. Assignments were placed in a sealed envelope and opened after participant consent. The research coordinator did not know or have access to the treatment assignment until the time of presentation. Main Outcome Measures The primary analysis compared the discrepancy detection rates between groups with respect to the health record and a best possible medication history.

AB - Background The Veterans Affairs Portland Healthcare System developed a medication history collection software that displays prescription names and medication images. Objective This article measures the frequency of medication discrepancy reporting using the medication history collection software and compares with the frequency of reporting using a paper-based process. This article also determines the accuracy of each method by comparing both strategies to a best possible medication history. Study Design Randomized, controlled, single-blind trial. Setting Three community-based primary care clinics associated with the Veterans Affairs Portland Healthcare System: a 300-bed teaching facility and ambulatory care network serving Veteran soldiers in the Pacific Northwest United States. Participants Of 212 patients with primary care appointments, 209 patients fulfilled the study requirements. Intervention Patients randomized to a software-directed medication history or a paper-based medication history. Randomization and allocation to treatment groups were performed using a computer-based random number generator. Assignments were placed in a sealed envelope and opened after participant consent. The research coordinator did not know or have access to the treatment assignment until the time of presentation. Main Outcome Measures The primary analysis compared the discrepancy detection rates between groups with respect to the health record and a best possible medication history.

KW - Clinical informatics

KW - Clinical information systems

KW - Consumer health informatics

KW - Medication adherence

KW - Medication errors

KW - Medication reconciliation

KW - Medication review

KW - Quality improvement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060548505&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85060548505&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1055/s-0038-1645889

DO - 10.1055/s-0038-1645889

M3 - Article

C2 - 29719884

AN - SCOPUS:85060548505

VL - 9

SP - 285

EP - 301

JO - Applied Clinical Informatics

JF - Applied Clinical Informatics

SN - 1869-0327

IS - 2

ER -