Evaluation of distributed practice schedules on retention of a newly acquired surgical skill

A randomized trial

Erica Mitchell, Dae Y. Lee, Nick Sevdalis, Aaron W. Partsafas, Gregory Landry, Timothy Liem, Gregory (Greg) Moneta

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Practice influences new skill acquisition. The aim of this study was to prospectively investigate the impact of practice distribution (weekly vs monthly) on complex motor skill (end-side vascular anastomosis) acquisition and 4-month retention. Methods Twenty-four surgical interns were randomly assigned to weekly training for 4 weeks or monthly training for 4 months, with equal total training times. Performance was assessed before training, immediately after training, after the completion of distributed training, and 4 months later. Results There was no statistical difference in surgical skill acquisition and retention between the weekly and monthly scheduled groups, as measured by procedural checklist scores, global rating scores of operative performance, final product analysis, and overall performance or assessment of operative "competence." Conclusions Distributed practice results in improvement and retention of a newly acquired surgical skill independent of weekly or monthly practice schedules. Flexibility in a surgical skills laboratory curriculum is possible without adversely affecting training.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)31-39
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Journal of Surgery
Volume201
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2011

Fingerprint

Motor Skills
Checklist
Curriculum
Mental Competency
Blood Vessels
Appointments and Schedules

Keywords

  • Distributed practice schedules
  • Motor skill acquisition
  • Motor skill retention
  • Operative competence
  • Practice distribution
  • Surgical skills laboratory curriculum
  • Vascular anastomosis
  • Vascular skills laboratory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Evaluation of distributed practice schedules on retention of a newly acquired surgical skill : A randomized trial. / Mitchell, Erica; Lee, Dae Y.; Sevdalis, Nick; Partsafas, Aaron W.; Landry, Gregory; Liem, Timothy; Moneta, Gregory (Greg).

In: American Journal of Surgery, Vol. 201, No. 1, 01.2011, p. 31-39.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a187b011d31e4a95a6b00bff37f9bf98,
title = "Evaluation of distributed practice schedules on retention of a newly acquired surgical skill: A randomized trial",
abstract = "Background Practice influences new skill acquisition. The aim of this study was to prospectively investigate the impact of practice distribution (weekly vs monthly) on complex motor skill (end-side vascular anastomosis) acquisition and 4-month retention. Methods Twenty-four surgical interns were randomly assigned to weekly training for 4 weeks or monthly training for 4 months, with equal total training times. Performance was assessed before training, immediately after training, after the completion of distributed training, and 4 months later. Results There was no statistical difference in surgical skill acquisition and retention between the weekly and monthly scheduled groups, as measured by procedural checklist scores, global rating scores of operative performance, final product analysis, and overall performance or assessment of operative {"}competence.{"} Conclusions Distributed practice results in improvement and retention of a newly acquired surgical skill independent of weekly or monthly practice schedules. Flexibility in a surgical skills laboratory curriculum is possible without adversely affecting training.",
keywords = "Distributed practice schedules, Motor skill acquisition, Motor skill retention, Operative competence, Practice distribution, Surgical skills laboratory curriculum, Vascular anastomosis, Vascular skills laboratory",
author = "Erica Mitchell and Lee, {Dae Y.} and Nick Sevdalis and Partsafas, {Aaron W.} and Gregory Landry and Timothy Liem and Moneta, {Gregory (Greg)}",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.07.040",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "201",
pages = "31--39",
journal = "American Journal of Surgery",
issn = "0002-9610",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of distributed practice schedules on retention of a newly acquired surgical skill

T2 - A randomized trial

AU - Mitchell, Erica

AU - Lee, Dae Y.

AU - Sevdalis, Nick

AU - Partsafas, Aaron W.

AU - Landry, Gregory

AU - Liem, Timothy

AU - Moneta, Gregory (Greg)

PY - 2011/1

Y1 - 2011/1

N2 - Background Practice influences new skill acquisition. The aim of this study was to prospectively investigate the impact of practice distribution (weekly vs monthly) on complex motor skill (end-side vascular anastomosis) acquisition and 4-month retention. Methods Twenty-four surgical interns were randomly assigned to weekly training for 4 weeks or monthly training for 4 months, with equal total training times. Performance was assessed before training, immediately after training, after the completion of distributed training, and 4 months later. Results There was no statistical difference in surgical skill acquisition and retention between the weekly and monthly scheduled groups, as measured by procedural checklist scores, global rating scores of operative performance, final product analysis, and overall performance or assessment of operative "competence." Conclusions Distributed practice results in improvement and retention of a newly acquired surgical skill independent of weekly or monthly practice schedules. Flexibility in a surgical skills laboratory curriculum is possible without adversely affecting training.

AB - Background Practice influences new skill acquisition. The aim of this study was to prospectively investigate the impact of practice distribution (weekly vs monthly) on complex motor skill (end-side vascular anastomosis) acquisition and 4-month retention. Methods Twenty-four surgical interns were randomly assigned to weekly training for 4 weeks or monthly training for 4 months, with equal total training times. Performance was assessed before training, immediately after training, after the completion of distributed training, and 4 months later. Results There was no statistical difference in surgical skill acquisition and retention between the weekly and monthly scheduled groups, as measured by procedural checklist scores, global rating scores of operative performance, final product analysis, and overall performance or assessment of operative "competence." Conclusions Distributed practice results in improvement and retention of a newly acquired surgical skill independent of weekly or monthly practice schedules. Flexibility in a surgical skills laboratory curriculum is possible without adversely affecting training.

KW - Distributed practice schedules

KW - Motor skill acquisition

KW - Motor skill retention

KW - Operative competence

KW - Practice distribution

KW - Surgical skills laboratory curriculum

KW - Vascular anastomosis

KW - Vascular skills laboratory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78650325851&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78650325851&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.07.040

DO - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.07.040

M3 - Article

VL - 201

SP - 31

EP - 39

JO - American Journal of Surgery

JF - American Journal of Surgery

SN - 0002-9610

IS - 1

ER -