TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation of cure, properties and wear resistance of Artglass dental composite
AU - Sean Freiberg, R.
AU - Ferracane, Jack L.
PY - 1998
Y1 - 1998
N2 - Purposes: (1) To evaluate the degree of conversion (DC) and the physical properties of a new dental composite, Artglass (Kulzer), designed primarily as a replacement material for porcelain in PFMs; and (2) to compare the efficacy of two different curing units for two dissimilar composites (Artglass and Charisma, Kulzer). Materials and Methods: Specimens (n=10) were prepared by curing either in a continuous light exposure unit (Triad II, Dentsply) or in a high intensity strobe unit (Uni XS, Kulzer) for 180 s. Specimens were aged 24 hrs in water at 37°C and tested for fracture toughness (FT-MPa m12; x-head=0.13 mm/min), flexural modulus (E, GPa), flexural strength (FS, MPa; x-head=0.5 mm/min), hardness (KHN, kg/mm2), and in vitro wear resistance (OHSU oral wear simulator). DC (%) was determined by transmission micro-FTIR. Results were compared by ANOVA/Tukey's test (P≤ 0.05). Results: DC, FT, E and FS were improved for Artglass and DC and E were improved for Charisma when the strobe curing unit was used, probably due to its increased intensity. Artglass showed a greater DC and FT but a lower E, KHN and wear resistance compared to Charisma when similar curing methods were used.
AB - Purposes: (1) To evaluate the degree of conversion (DC) and the physical properties of a new dental composite, Artglass (Kulzer), designed primarily as a replacement material for porcelain in PFMs; and (2) to compare the efficacy of two different curing units for two dissimilar composites (Artglass and Charisma, Kulzer). Materials and Methods: Specimens (n=10) were prepared by curing either in a continuous light exposure unit (Triad II, Dentsply) or in a high intensity strobe unit (Uni XS, Kulzer) for 180 s. Specimens were aged 24 hrs in water at 37°C and tested for fracture toughness (FT-MPa m12; x-head=0.13 mm/min), flexural modulus (E, GPa), flexural strength (FS, MPa; x-head=0.5 mm/min), hardness (KHN, kg/mm2), and in vitro wear resistance (OHSU oral wear simulator). DC (%) was determined by transmission micro-FTIR. Results were compared by ANOVA/Tukey's test (P≤ 0.05). Results: DC, FT, E and FS were improved for Artglass and DC and E were improved for Charisma when the strobe curing unit was used, probably due to its increased intensity. Artglass showed a greater DC and FT but a lower E, KHN and wear resistance compared to Charisma when similar curing methods were used.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032174453&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032174453&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 10388379
AN - SCOPUS:0032174453
SN - 0894-8275
VL - 11
SP - 214
EP - 218
JO - American Journal of Dentistry
JF - American Journal of Dentistry
IS - 5
ER -