Evaluation of an electronic Health record (EHR) tool for integrated behavioral health in primary care

Katelyn K. Jetelina, Tanisha Tate Woodson, Rose Gunn, Brianna Muller, Khaya D. Clark, Jennifer Devoe, Bijal A. Balasubramanian, Deborah Cohen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Integrating behavioral health into primary care can improve care quality; however, most electronic health records are not designed to meet the needs of integrated teams. We worked with practices and behavioral health (BH) clinicians to design a suite of electronic health record tools to address these needs (“BH e-Suite”). The purpose of this article is to examine whether implementation of the BH e-Suite changes process of care, intermediate clinical outcomes, and patient experiences, and whether its use is acceptable to practice members and BH clinicians. Methods: We conducted a convergent mixed-methods proof-of-concept study, implementing the BH e-Suite across 6 Oregon federally qualified community health centers (“intervention clinics”). We matched intervention clinics to 6 control clinics, based on location and patient panel characteristics, to assess whether process of care (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9] and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 screening) and intermediate outcomes (PHQ-9, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 scores) changed postimplementation. Prepost patient surveys were used to assess changes in patient experience. To elucidate factors influencing implementation, we merged quantitative findings with structured observations, surveys, and interviews with practice members. Results: Implementation improved process of care (PHQ-9 screening). During the course of the study, change in intermediate outcomes was not observed. Degree of BH e-Suite implementation varied: 2 clinics fully implemented, 2 partially implemented, and 2 practices did not implement at all. Initial practice conditions (eg, low resistance to change, higher capacity), process characteristics (eg, thoughtful planning), and individual characteristics (eg, high self-efficacy) were related to degree of implementation. Conclusions: Health information technology tools designed for behavioral health integration must fit the needs of clinics for the successful uptake and improvement in patient experiences. Research is needed to further assess the effectiveness of this tool in improving patient outcomes and to optimize broader dissemination of this tool among primary care clinics integrating behavioral health.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)712-723
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Volume31
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2018

Fingerprint

Electronic Health Records
Primary Health Care
Health
Anxiety Disorders
Patient Care
Delivery of Health Care
Community Health Centers
Medical Informatics
Quality of Health Care
Self Efficacy
Surveys and Questionnaires
Interviews

Keywords

  • Community Health Centers
  • Electronic Health Records
  • Oregon
  • Patient Health Questionnaire
  • Primary Health Care
  • Proof of Concept Study
  • Questionnaires
  • Surveys

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Family Practice

Cite this

Evaluation of an electronic Health record (EHR) tool for integrated behavioral health in primary care. / Jetelina, Katelyn K.; Woodson, Tanisha Tate; Gunn, Rose; Muller, Brianna; Clark, Khaya D.; Devoe, Jennifer; Balasubramanian, Bijal A.; Cohen, Deborah.

In: Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, Vol. 31, No. 5, 01.09.2018, p. 712-723.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jetelina, Katelyn K. ; Woodson, Tanisha Tate ; Gunn, Rose ; Muller, Brianna ; Clark, Khaya D. ; Devoe, Jennifer ; Balasubramanian, Bijal A. ; Cohen, Deborah. / Evaluation of an electronic Health record (EHR) tool for integrated behavioral health in primary care. In: Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine. 2018 ; Vol. 31, No. 5. pp. 712-723.
@article{e75afd12fb1f45debec6ad45bc88d348,
title = "Evaluation of an electronic Health record (EHR) tool for integrated behavioral health in primary care",
abstract = "Background: Integrating behavioral health into primary care can improve care quality; however, most electronic health records are not designed to meet the needs of integrated teams. We worked with practices and behavioral health (BH) clinicians to design a suite of electronic health record tools to address these needs (“BH e-Suite”). The purpose of this article is to examine whether implementation of the BH e-Suite changes process of care, intermediate clinical outcomes, and patient experiences, and whether its use is acceptable to practice members and BH clinicians. Methods: We conducted a convergent mixed-methods proof-of-concept study, implementing the BH e-Suite across 6 Oregon federally qualified community health centers (“intervention clinics”). We matched intervention clinics to 6 control clinics, based on location and patient panel characteristics, to assess whether process of care (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9] and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 screening) and intermediate outcomes (PHQ-9, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 scores) changed postimplementation. Prepost patient surveys were used to assess changes in patient experience. To elucidate factors influencing implementation, we merged quantitative findings with structured observations, surveys, and interviews with practice members. Results: Implementation improved process of care (PHQ-9 screening). During the course of the study, change in intermediate outcomes was not observed. Degree of BH e-Suite implementation varied: 2 clinics fully implemented, 2 partially implemented, and 2 practices did not implement at all. Initial practice conditions (eg, low resistance to change, higher capacity), process characteristics (eg, thoughtful planning), and individual characteristics (eg, high self-efficacy) were related to degree of implementation. Conclusions: Health information technology tools designed for behavioral health integration must fit the needs of clinics for the successful uptake and improvement in patient experiences. Research is needed to further assess the effectiveness of this tool in improving patient outcomes and to optimize broader dissemination of this tool among primary care clinics integrating behavioral health.",
keywords = "Community Health Centers, Electronic Health Records, Oregon, Patient Health Questionnaire, Primary Health Care, Proof of Concept Study, Questionnaires, Surveys",
author = "Jetelina, {Katelyn K.} and Woodson, {Tanisha Tate} and Rose Gunn and Brianna Muller and Clark, {Khaya D.} and Jennifer Devoe and Balasubramanian, {Bijal A.} and Deborah Cohen",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3122/jabfm.2018.05.180041",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "712--723",
journal = "Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine",
issn = "1557-2625",
publisher = "American Board of Family Medicine",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of an electronic Health record (EHR) tool for integrated behavioral health in primary care

AU - Jetelina, Katelyn K.

AU - Woodson, Tanisha Tate

AU - Gunn, Rose

AU - Muller, Brianna

AU - Clark, Khaya D.

AU - Devoe, Jennifer

AU - Balasubramanian, Bijal A.

AU - Cohen, Deborah

PY - 2018/9/1

Y1 - 2018/9/1

N2 - Background: Integrating behavioral health into primary care can improve care quality; however, most electronic health records are not designed to meet the needs of integrated teams. We worked with practices and behavioral health (BH) clinicians to design a suite of electronic health record tools to address these needs (“BH e-Suite”). The purpose of this article is to examine whether implementation of the BH e-Suite changes process of care, intermediate clinical outcomes, and patient experiences, and whether its use is acceptable to practice members and BH clinicians. Methods: We conducted a convergent mixed-methods proof-of-concept study, implementing the BH e-Suite across 6 Oregon federally qualified community health centers (“intervention clinics”). We matched intervention clinics to 6 control clinics, based on location and patient panel characteristics, to assess whether process of care (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9] and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 screening) and intermediate outcomes (PHQ-9, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 scores) changed postimplementation. Prepost patient surveys were used to assess changes in patient experience. To elucidate factors influencing implementation, we merged quantitative findings with structured observations, surveys, and interviews with practice members. Results: Implementation improved process of care (PHQ-9 screening). During the course of the study, change in intermediate outcomes was not observed. Degree of BH e-Suite implementation varied: 2 clinics fully implemented, 2 partially implemented, and 2 practices did not implement at all. Initial practice conditions (eg, low resistance to change, higher capacity), process characteristics (eg, thoughtful planning), and individual characteristics (eg, high self-efficacy) were related to degree of implementation. Conclusions: Health information technology tools designed for behavioral health integration must fit the needs of clinics for the successful uptake and improvement in patient experiences. Research is needed to further assess the effectiveness of this tool in improving patient outcomes and to optimize broader dissemination of this tool among primary care clinics integrating behavioral health.

AB - Background: Integrating behavioral health into primary care can improve care quality; however, most electronic health records are not designed to meet the needs of integrated teams. We worked with practices and behavioral health (BH) clinicians to design a suite of electronic health record tools to address these needs (“BH e-Suite”). The purpose of this article is to examine whether implementation of the BH e-Suite changes process of care, intermediate clinical outcomes, and patient experiences, and whether its use is acceptable to practice members and BH clinicians. Methods: We conducted a convergent mixed-methods proof-of-concept study, implementing the BH e-Suite across 6 Oregon federally qualified community health centers (“intervention clinics”). We matched intervention clinics to 6 control clinics, based on location and patient panel characteristics, to assess whether process of care (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9] and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 screening) and intermediate outcomes (PHQ-9, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 scores) changed postimplementation. Prepost patient surveys were used to assess changes in patient experience. To elucidate factors influencing implementation, we merged quantitative findings with structured observations, surveys, and interviews with practice members. Results: Implementation improved process of care (PHQ-9 screening). During the course of the study, change in intermediate outcomes was not observed. Degree of BH e-Suite implementation varied: 2 clinics fully implemented, 2 partially implemented, and 2 practices did not implement at all. Initial practice conditions (eg, low resistance to change, higher capacity), process characteristics (eg, thoughtful planning), and individual characteristics (eg, high self-efficacy) were related to degree of implementation. Conclusions: Health information technology tools designed for behavioral health integration must fit the needs of clinics for the successful uptake and improvement in patient experiences. Research is needed to further assess the effectiveness of this tool in improving patient outcomes and to optimize broader dissemination of this tool among primary care clinics integrating behavioral health.

KW - Community Health Centers

KW - Electronic Health Records

KW - Oregon

KW - Patient Health Questionnaire

KW - Primary Health Care

KW - Proof of Concept Study

KW - Questionnaires

KW - Surveys

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053282055&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85053282055&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3122/jabfm.2018.05.180041

DO - 10.3122/jabfm.2018.05.180041

M3 - Article

C2 - 30201667

AN - SCOPUS:85053282055

VL - 31

SP - 712

EP - 723

JO - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

JF - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

SN - 1557-2625

IS - 5

ER -