Evaluation of a physician education intervention to improve primary care for low-back pain ii

Empact on patients

Dan Cherkin, Richard (Rick) Deyo, Alfred O. Berg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

62 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A physician education intervention was previously found to have significantly improved perceived physician knowledge, confidence, and patient-reassuring behavior in the treatment of low-back pain. This study examined whether this intervention, presented in a health maintenance organization clinic, had an effect on patient outcomes. Outcomes of care for 148 patients seen for low- back pain before the intervention were compared with outcomes of care for 157 patients seen after the intervention. Patients were telephoned 2-4 weeks after their back-pain visit and were asked about symptom improvement, amount of disability, and satisfaction with care. Satisfaction was measured with a three-dimensional instrument for low-back pain developed specifically for this study, which was found to be valid and reliable. The preintervention and postintervention patient cohorts were similar in terms of key baseline variables. Despite its apparent benefit to physicians, the intervention did not result in significant improvements in any patient outcomes, even for the subset of patients whose physicians had perceived the greatest benefit.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1173-1178
Number of pages6
JournalSpine
Volume16
Issue number10
StatePublished - 1991
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Low Back Pain
Primary Health Care
Physicians
Education
Patient Care
Health Maintenance Organizations
Back Pain

Keywords

  • Continuing medical education
  • Low-back pain
  • Patient outcomes
  • Patient satisfaction
  • Primary care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physiology

Cite this

Evaluation of a physician education intervention to improve primary care for low-back pain ii : Empact on patients. / Cherkin, Dan; Deyo, Richard (Rick); Berg, Alfred O.

In: Spine, Vol. 16, No. 10, 1991, p. 1173-1178.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6621270504cb403cacad84aa698a9e71,
title = "Evaluation of a physician education intervention to improve primary care for low-back pain ii: Empact on patients",
abstract = "A physician education intervention was previously found to have significantly improved perceived physician knowledge, confidence, and patient-reassuring behavior in the treatment of low-back pain. This study examined whether this intervention, presented in a health maintenance organization clinic, had an effect on patient outcomes. Outcomes of care for 148 patients seen for low- back pain before the intervention were compared with outcomes of care for 157 patients seen after the intervention. Patients were telephoned 2-4 weeks after their back-pain visit and were asked about symptom improvement, amount of disability, and satisfaction with care. Satisfaction was measured with a three-dimensional instrument for low-back pain developed specifically for this study, which was found to be valid and reliable. The preintervention and postintervention patient cohorts were similar in terms of key baseline variables. Despite its apparent benefit to physicians, the intervention did not result in significant improvements in any patient outcomes, even for the subset of patients whose physicians had perceived the greatest benefit.",
keywords = "Continuing medical education, Low-back pain, Patient outcomes, Patient satisfaction, Primary care",
author = "Dan Cherkin and Deyo, {Richard (Rick)} and Berg, {Alfred O.}",
year = "1991",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "1173--1178",
journal = "Spine",
issn = "0362-2436",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of a physician education intervention to improve primary care for low-back pain ii

T2 - Empact on patients

AU - Cherkin, Dan

AU - Deyo, Richard (Rick)

AU - Berg, Alfred O.

PY - 1991

Y1 - 1991

N2 - A physician education intervention was previously found to have significantly improved perceived physician knowledge, confidence, and patient-reassuring behavior in the treatment of low-back pain. This study examined whether this intervention, presented in a health maintenance organization clinic, had an effect on patient outcomes. Outcomes of care for 148 patients seen for low- back pain before the intervention were compared with outcomes of care for 157 patients seen after the intervention. Patients were telephoned 2-4 weeks after their back-pain visit and were asked about symptom improvement, amount of disability, and satisfaction with care. Satisfaction was measured with a three-dimensional instrument for low-back pain developed specifically for this study, which was found to be valid and reliable. The preintervention and postintervention patient cohorts were similar in terms of key baseline variables. Despite its apparent benefit to physicians, the intervention did not result in significant improvements in any patient outcomes, even for the subset of patients whose physicians had perceived the greatest benefit.

AB - A physician education intervention was previously found to have significantly improved perceived physician knowledge, confidence, and patient-reassuring behavior in the treatment of low-back pain. This study examined whether this intervention, presented in a health maintenance organization clinic, had an effect on patient outcomes. Outcomes of care for 148 patients seen for low- back pain before the intervention were compared with outcomes of care for 157 patients seen after the intervention. Patients were telephoned 2-4 weeks after their back-pain visit and were asked about symptom improvement, amount of disability, and satisfaction with care. Satisfaction was measured with a three-dimensional instrument for low-back pain developed specifically for this study, which was found to be valid and reliable. The preintervention and postintervention patient cohorts were similar in terms of key baseline variables. Despite its apparent benefit to physicians, the intervention did not result in significant improvements in any patient outcomes, even for the subset of patients whose physicians had perceived the greatest benefit.

KW - Continuing medical education

KW - Low-back pain

KW - Patient outcomes

KW - Patient satisfaction

KW - Primary care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025990394&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025990394&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 1173

EP - 1178

JO - Spine

JF - Spine

SN - 0362-2436

IS - 10

ER -