Evaluation of a novel out-of-plane needle guide

Andrew Neice, Camelia Forton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives-Most ultrasound-guided regional procedures use an in-plane approach. Out-of-plane approaches may be desirable in some situations but can be difficult because of an inability to visualize the needle until it intersects the plane of the ultrasonic beam. Here we present a novel out-of-plane needle guide, using a retreating depth stop, and compare its performance with unguided in-plane and out-of-plane techniques. Methods-First- and third-year medical students with no or minimal ultrasound experience were recruited for the study. After a brief training session on in-plane and out-of-plane needling techniques, as well as use of the retreating-stop needle guide, they attempted to place a needle as close as possible to a target embedded in porcine tissue. The total time to complete the procedure was measured. Accuracy was measured by a skilled sonographer, who identified the needle tip and measured the distance to the target. The data were tested for significance using an analysis of variance. Results-The mean total time spent differed significantly between groups (novel needle guide, 34 seconds; in-plane, 120 seconds; out-of-plane, 113 seconds; P=.021). Needle proximity was on average more accurate with the needle guide, although this difference was not statistically significant (novel needle guide, 8mm; in-plane, 15mm; out-of-plane, 14 mm; P=.289). Conclusions-In relatively inexperienced sonographers, the retreating-stop needle guide reduced the procedure time compared with in-plane and out-of-plane techniques. No significant changes in needling accuracy were observed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)543-549
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Ultrasound in Medicine
Volume37
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2018

Fingerprint

Needles
Medical Students
Ultrasonics
Analysis of Variance
Swine

Keywords

  • Anesthesiology
  • In-plane ultrasound
  • Needle guide
  • Out-of-plane ultrasound
  • Retreating stop
  • Ultrasound equipment and products
  • Ultrasound guided
  • Ultrasound techniques/physics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Evaluation of a novel out-of-plane needle guide. / Neice, Andrew; Forton, Camelia.

In: Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, Vol. 37, No. 3, 01.03.2018, p. 543-549.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Neice, Andrew ; Forton, Camelia. / Evaluation of a novel out-of-plane needle guide. In: Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine. 2018 ; Vol. 37, No. 3. pp. 543-549.
@article{94d2817f0770463291c8e190b5aebb4f,
title = "Evaluation of a novel out-of-plane needle guide",
abstract = "Objectives-Most ultrasound-guided regional procedures use an in-plane approach. Out-of-plane approaches may be desirable in some situations but can be difficult because of an inability to visualize the needle until it intersects the plane of the ultrasonic beam. Here we present a novel out-of-plane needle guide, using a retreating depth stop, and compare its performance with unguided in-plane and out-of-plane techniques. Methods-First- and third-year medical students with no or minimal ultrasound experience were recruited for the study. After a brief training session on in-plane and out-of-plane needling techniques, as well as use of the retreating-stop needle guide, they attempted to place a needle as close as possible to a target embedded in porcine tissue. The total time to complete the procedure was measured. Accuracy was measured by a skilled sonographer, who identified the needle tip and measured the distance to the target. The data were tested for significance using an analysis of variance. Results-The mean total time spent differed significantly between groups (novel needle guide, 34 seconds; in-plane, 120 seconds; out-of-plane, 113 seconds; P=.021). Needle proximity was on average more accurate with the needle guide, although this difference was not statistically significant (novel needle guide, 8mm; in-plane, 15mm; out-of-plane, 14 mm; P=.289). Conclusions-In relatively inexperienced sonographers, the retreating-stop needle guide reduced the procedure time compared with in-plane and out-of-plane techniques. No significant changes in needling accuracy were observed.",
keywords = "Anesthesiology, In-plane ultrasound, Needle guide, Out-of-plane ultrasound, Retreating stop, Ultrasound equipment and products, Ultrasound guided, Ultrasound techniques/physics",
author = "Andrew Neice and Camelia Forton",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/jum.14361",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "543--549",
journal = "Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine",
issn = "0278-4297",
publisher = "American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of a novel out-of-plane needle guide

AU - Neice, Andrew

AU - Forton, Camelia

PY - 2018/3/1

Y1 - 2018/3/1

N2 - Objectives-Most ultrasound-guided regional procedures use an in-plane approach. Out-of-plane approaches may be desirable in some situations but can be difficult because of an inability to visualize the needle until it intersects the plane of the ultrasonic beam. Here we present a novel out-of-plane needle guide, using a retreating depth stop, and compare its performance with unguided in-plane and out-of-plane techniques. Methods-First- and third-year medical students with no or minimal ultrasound experience were recruited for the study. After a brief training session on in-plane and out-of-plane needling techniques, as well as use of the retreating-stop needle guide, they attempted to place a needle as close as possible to a target embedded in porcine tissue. The total time to complete the procedure was measured. Accuracy was measured by a skilled sonographer, who identified the needle tip and measured the distance to the target. The data were tested for significance using an analysis of variance. Results-The mean total time spent differed significantly between groups (novel needle guide, 34 seconds; in-plane, 120 seconds; out-of-plane, 113 seconds; P=.021). Needle proximity was on average more accurate with the needle guide, although this difference was not statistically significant (novel needle guide, 8mm; in-plane, 15mm; out-of-plane, 14 mm; P=.289). Conclusions-In relatively inexperienced sonographers, the retreating-stop needle guide reduced the procedure time compared with in-plane and out-of-plane techniques. No significant changes in needling accuracy were observed.

AB - Objectives-Most ultrasound-guided regional procedures use an in-plane approach. Out-of-plane approaches may be desirable in some situations but can be difficult because of an inability to visualize the needle until it intersects the plane of the ultrasonic beam. Here we present a novel out-of-plane needle guide, using a retreating depth stop, and compare its performance with unguided in-plane and out-of-plane techniques. Methods-First- and third-year medical students with no or minimal ultrasound experience were recruited for the study. After a brief training session on in-plane and out-of-plane needling techniques, as well as use of the retreating-stop needle guide, they attempted to place a needle as close as possible to a target embedded in porcine tissue. The total time to complete the procedure was measured. Accuracy was measured by a skilled sonographer, who identified the needle tip and measured the distance to the target. The data were tested for significance using an analysis of variance. Results-The mean total time spent differed significantly between groups (novel needle guide, 34 seconds; in-plane, 120 seconds; out-of-plane, 113 seconds; P=.021). Needle proximity was on average more accurate with the needle guide, although this difference was not statistically significant (novel needle guide, 8mm; in-plane, 15mm; out-of-plane, 14 mm; P=.289). Conclusions-In relatively inexperienced sonographers, the retreating-stop needle guide reduced the procedure time compared with in-plane and out-of-plane techniques. No significant changes in needling accuracy were observed.

KW - Anesthesiology

KW - In-plane ultrasound

KW - Needle guide

KW - Out-of-plane ultrasound

KW - Retreating stop

KW - Ultrasound equipment and products

KW - Ultrasound guided

KW - Ultrasound techniques/physics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045853408&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85045853408&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jum.14361

DO - 10.1002/jum.14361

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 543

EP - 549

JO - Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine

JF - Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine

SN - 0278-4297

IS - 3

ER -