Evaluation of a community health promotion resource for primary care practices

Sue Flocke, Lisa E. Gordon, Ginger L. Pomiecko

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Primary care physicians' ability to provide effective health behavior change advice might be leveraged by linking to available community resources. This study evaluates tools to facilitate such a link. Design: A mixed methods longitudinal pre-post-test study was conducted in 2004. Setting/Participants: Seven primary care practices in northeast Ohio and two longitudinal cohorts of patients (n=784). Intervention: The practice-tailored intervention included two main components: (1) a web-based health behavior change resource including a database of community programs and patient education materials, and (2) a health behavior prescription pad. Main Outcome Measures: Rates of discussion of diet, exercise, weight management, and smoking cessation; and patient change in motivation to modify behaviors at 8 weeks post-visit. Qualitative field notes about practice routines, culture, and implementation efforts were analyzed to enhance understanding of the practice change process. Results: The post-intervention cohort reported higher rates of discussion of diet (25.7% vs 20.2%), exercise (27.8% vs 16.9%), and weight management (23.2% vs 16.3%), and greater referral to patient education materials (24.2% vs 21.6%) and community programs for health behavior change (16.0% vs 13.6%) (p<0.05). No difference in change in patient motivation to modify behavior was observed between the pre- and post-intervention cohorts. Evaluation of the qualitative field notes suggests that for six of seven practices, the intervention was not appreciably implemented. Conclusions: The intervention tools show promise for increasing clinician discussion of health behaviors, information referral, and referral to community resources. Additional work to increase practice adoption of the tools is required to understand their potential to affect patient motivation to change behavior.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)243-251
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican journal of preventive medicine
Volume30
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Health Resources
Health Behavior
Health Promotion
Primary Health Care
Motivation
Referral and Consultation
Patient Education
Exercise
Diet
Weights and Measures
Aptitude
Primary Care Physicians
Smoking Cessation
Prescriptions
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Databases

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Evaluation of a community health promotion resource for primary care practices. / Flocke, Sue; Gordon, Lisa E.; Pomiecko, Ginger L.

In: American journal of preventive medicine, Vol. 30, No. 3, 01.03.2006, p. 243-251.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Flocke, Sue ; Gordon, Lisa E. ; Pomiecko, Ginger L. / Evaluation of a community health promotion resource for primary care practices. In: American journal of preventive medicine. 2006 ; Vol. 30, No. 3. pp. 243-251.
@article{070553cebc2e4938b5cbea5f36a4546f,
title = "Evaluation of a community health promotion resource for primary care practices",
abstract = "Background: Primary care physicians' ability to provide effective health behavior change advice might be leveraged by linking to available community resources. This study evaluates tools to facilitate such a link. Design: A mixed methods longitudinal pre-post-test study was conducted in 2004. Setting/Participants: Seven primary care practices in northeast Ohio and two longitudinal cohorts of patients (n=784). Intervention: The practice-tailored intervention included two main components: (1) a web-based health behavior change resource including a database of community programs and patient education materials, and (2) a health behavior prescription pad. Main Outcome Measures: Rates of discussion of diet, exercise, weight management, and smoking cessation; and patient change in motivation to modify behaviors at 8 weeks post-visit. Qualitative field notes about practice routines, culture, and implementation efforts were analyzed to enhance understanding of the practice change process. Results: The post-intervention cohort reported higher rates of discussion of diet (25.7{\%} vs 20.2{\%}), exercise (27.8{\%} vs 16.9{\%}), and weight management (23.2{\%} vs 16.3{\%}), and greater referral to patient education materials (24.2{\%} vs 21.6{\%}) and community programs for health behavior change (16.0{\%} vs 13.6{\%}) (p<0.05). No difference in change in patient motivation to modify behavior was observed between the pre- and post-intervention cohorts. Evaluation of the qualitative field notes suggests that for six of seven practices, the intervention was not appreciably implemented. Conclusions: The intervention tools show promise for increasing clinician discussion of health behaviors, information referral, and referral to community resources. Additional work to increase practice adoption of the tools is required to understand their potential to affect patient motivation to change behavior.",
author = "Sue Flocke and Gordon, {Lisa E.} and Pomiecko, {Ginger L.}",
year = "2006",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.amepre.2005.10.021",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "243--251",
journal = "American Journal of Preventive Medicine",
issn = "0749-3797",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of a community health promotion resource for primary care practices

AU - Flocke, Sue

AU - Gordon, Lisa E.

AU - Pomiecko, Ginger L.

PY - 2006/3/1

Y1 - 2006/3/1

N2 - Background: Primary care physicians' ability to provide effective health behavior change advice might be leveraged by linking to available community resources. This study evaluates tools to facilitate such a link. Design: A mixed methods longitudinal pre-post-test study was conducted in 2004. Setting/Participants: Seven primary care practices in northeast Ohio and two longitudinal cohorts of patients (n=784). Intervention: The practice-tailored intervention included two main components: (1) a web-based health behavior change resource including a database of community programs and patient education materials, and (2) a health behavior prescription pad. Main Outcome Measures: Rates of discussion of diet, exercise, weight management, and smoking cessation; and patient change in motivation to modify behaviors at 8 weeks post-visit. Qualitative field notes about practice routines, culture, and implementation efforts were analyzed to enhance understanding of the practice change process. Results: The post-intervention cohort reported higher rates of discussion of diet (25.7% vs 20.2%), exercise (27.8% vs 16.9%), and weight management (23.2% vs 16.3%), and greater referral to patient education materials (24.2% vs 21.6%) and community programs for health behavior change (16.0% vs 13.6%) (p<0.05). No difference in change in patient motivation to modify behavior was observed between the pre- and post-intervention cohorts. Evaluation of the qualitative field notes suggests that for six of seven practices, the intervention was not appreciably implemented. Conclusions: The intervention tools show promise for increasing clinician discussion of health behaviors, information referral, and referral to community resources. Additional work to increase practice adoption of the tools is required to understand their potential to affect patient motivation to change behavior.

AB - Background: Primary care physicians' ability to provide effective health behavior change advice might be leveraged by linking to available community resources. This study evaluates tools to facilitate such a link. Design: A mixed methods longitudinal pre-post-test study was conducted in 2004. Setting/Participants: Seven primary care practices in northeast Ohio and two longitudinal cohorts of patients (n=784). Intervention: The practice-tailored intervention included two main components: (1) a web-based health behavior change resource including a database of community programs and patient education materials, and (2) a health behavior prescription pad. Main Outcome Measures: Rates of discussion of diet, exercise, weight management, and smoking cessation; and patient change in motivation to modify behaviors at 8 weeks post-visit. Qualitative field notes about practice routines, culture, and implementation efforts were analyzed to enhance understanding of the practice change process. Results: The post-intervention cohort reported higher rates of discussion of diet (25.7% vs 20.2%), exercise (27.8% vs 16.9%), and weight management (23.2% vs 16.3%), and greater referral to patient education materials (24.2% vs 21.6%) and community programs for health behavior change (16.0% vs 13.6%) (p<0.05). No difference in change in patient motivation to modify behavior was observed between the pre- and post-intervention cohorts. Evaluation of the qualitative field notes suggests that for six of seven practices, the intervention was not appreciably implemented. Conclusions: The intervention tools show promise for increasing clinician discussion of health behaviors, information referral, and referral to community resources. Additional work to increase practice adoption of the tools is required to understand their potential to affect patient motivation to change behavior.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=32344442029&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=32344442029&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.10.021

DO - 10.1016/j.amepre.2005.10.021

M3 - Article

C2 - 16476641

AN - SCOPUS:32344442029

VL - 30

SP - 243

EP - 251

JO - American Journal of Preventive Medicine

JF - American Journal of Preventive Medicine

SN - 0749-3797

IS - 3

ER -