TY - GEN
T1 - Evaluation axes for medical image retrieval systems - The ImageCLEF experience
AU - Müller, Henning
AU - Clough, Paul
AU - Hersh, William
AU - Deselaers, Thomas
AU - Lehmann, Thomas
AU - Geissbuhler, Antoine
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2013 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2005
Y1 - 2005
N2 - Content-based image retrieval in the medical domain is an extremely hot topic in medical imaging as it promises to help better managing the large amount of medical images being produced. Applications are mainly expected in the field of medical teaching files and for research projects, where performance issues and speed are less critical than in the field of diagnostic aid. Final goal with most impact will be the use as a diagnostic aid in a real-world clinical setting. Other applications of image retrieval and image classification can be the automatic annotation of images with basic concepts or the control of DICOM header information. ImageCLEF is part of the Cross Language Evaluation Forum (CLEF). Since 2004, a medical image retrieval task has been added. Goal is to create databases of a realistic and useful size and also query topics that are based on real-world needs in the medical domain but still correspond to the limited capabilities of purely visual retrieval at the moment. Goal is to direct the research onto real applications and towards real clinical problems to give researchers who are not directly linked to medical facilities a possibility to work on the interesting problem of medical image retrieval based on real data sets and problems. The missing link between computer science research departments and clinical routine is one of the biggest problems that becomes evident when reading much of the current literature on medical image retrieval. Most databases are extremely small, the treated problems often far from clinical reality, and there is no integration of the prototypes into a hospital infrastructure. Only few retrieval articles specifically mention problems related to the DICOM format (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine) and the sheer amount of data that needs to be treated in an image archive (> 30.000 images per day in the Geneva radiology). This article develops the various axes that can be taken into account for medical image retrieval system evaluation. First, the axes are developed based on current challenges and experiences from ImageCLEF. Then, the resources developed for ImageCLEF are listed and finally, the application of the axes is explained to show the bases of the Im-ageCLEFmed evaluation campaign. This article will only concentrate on the medical retrieval tasks, the non-medical tasks will only shortly be mentioned.
AB - Content-based image retrieval in the medical domain is an extremely hot topic in medical imaging as it promises to help better managing the large amount of medical images being produced. Applications are mainly expected in the field of medical teaching files and for research projects, where performance issues and speed are less critical than in the field of diagnostic aid. Final goal with most impact will be the use as a diagnostic aid in a real-world clinical setting. Other applications of image retrieval and image classification can be the automatic annotation of images with basic concepts or the control of DICOM header information. ImageCLEF is part of the Cross Language Evaluation Forum (CLEF). Since 2004, a medical image retrieval task has been added. Goal is to create databases of a realistic and useful size and also query topics that are based on real-world needs in the medical domain but still correspond to the limited capabilities of purely visual retrieval at the moment. Goal is to direct the research onto real applications and towards real clinical problems to give researchers who are not directly linked to medical facilities a possibility to work on the interesting problem of medical image retrieval based on real data sets and problems. The missing link between computer science research departments and clinical routine is one of the biggest problems that becomes evident when reading much of the current literature on medical image retrieval. Most databases are extremely small, the treated problems often far from clinical reality, and there is no integration of the prototypes into a hospital infrastructure. Only few retrieval articles specifically mention problems related to the DICOM format (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine) and the sheer amount of data that needs to be treated in an image archive (> 30.000 images per day in the Geneva radiology). This article develops the various axes that can be taken into account for medical image retrieval system evaluation. First, the axes are developed based on current challenges and experiences from ImageCLEF. Then, the resources developed for ImageCLEF are listed and finally, the application of the axes is explained to show the bases of the Im-ageCLEFmed evaluation campaign. This article will only concentrate on the medical retrieval tasks, the non-medical tasks will only shortly be mentioned.
KW - Benchmarking
KW - Content-based image retrieval
KW - Evaluation
KW - Image retrieval
KW - Medical image retrieval
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33749620472&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33749620472&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1145/1101149.1101358
DO - 10.1145/1101149.1101358
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:33749620472
SN - 1595930442
SN - 9781595930446
T3 - Proceedings of the 13th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, MM 2005
SP - 1014
EP - 1022
BT - Proceedings of the 13th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, MM 2005
T2 - 13th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, MM 2005
Y2 - 6 November 2005 through 11 November 2005
ER -