Evaluation-as-a-service for the computational sciences: Overview and outlook

Frank Hopfgartner, Allan Hanbury, Henning MÜLler, Ivan Eggel, Krisztian Balog, Torben Brodt, Gordon V. Cormack, Jimmy Lin, Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer, Noriko Kando, Makoto P. Kato, Anastasia Krithara, Tim Gollub, Martin Potthast, Evelyne Viegas, Simon Mercer

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations


Evaluation in empirical computer science is essential to show progress and assess technologies developed. Several research domains such as information retrieval have long relied on systematic evaluation to measure progress: here, the Cranfeld paradigm of creating shared test collections, defning search tasks, and collecting ground truth for these tasks has persisted up until now. In recent years, however, several new challenges have emerged that do not ft this paradigm very well: extremely large data sets, confdential data sets as found in the medical domain, and rapidly changing data sets as often encountered in industry. Crowdsourcing has also changed the way in which industry approaches problem-solving with companies now organizing challenges and handing out monetary awards to incentivize people to work on their challenges, particularly in the feld of machine learning. This article is based on discussions at a workshop on Evaluation-as-a-Service (EaaS). EaaS is the paradigm of not providing data sets to participants and have them work on the data locally, but keeping the data central and allowing access via Application Programming Interfaces (API), Virtual Machines (VM), or other possibilities to ship executables. The objectives of this article are to summarize and compare the current approaches and consolidate the experiences of these approaches to outline the next steps of EaaS, particularly toward sustainable research infrastructures. The article summarizes several existing approaches to EaaS and analyzes their usage scenarios and also the advantages and disadvantages. The many factors influencing EaaS are summarized, and the environment in terms of motivations for the various stakeholders, from funding agencies to challenge organizers, researchers and participants, to industry interested in supplying real-world problems for which they require solutions. EaaS solves many problems of the current research environment, where data sets are often not accessible to many researchers. Executables of published tools are equally often not available making the reproducibility of results impossible. EaaS, however, creates reusable/citable data sets as well as available executables. Many challenges remain, but such a framework for research can also foster more collaboration between researchers, potentially increasing the speed of obtaining research results.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbera15
JournalJournal of Data and Information Quality
Issue number4
StatePublished - Oct 2018
Externally publishedYes


  • Benchmarking
  • Evaluation-as-a-service
  • Information access systems

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Information Systems
  • Information Systems and Management


Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation-as-a-service for the computational sciences: Overview and outlook'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this