Ethics rounds: Trisomy 18 and complex congenital heart disease: Seeking the threshold benefit

Renee D. Boss, Kathryn W. Holmes, Janyne Althaus, Cynda H. Rushton, Hunter McNee, Theresa McNee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

30 Scopus citations

Abstract

A prenatal diagnosis of ductal-dependent, complex congenital heart disease was made in a fetus with trisomy 18. The parents requested that the genetic diagnosis be excluded from all medical and surgical decision-making and that all life-prolonging therapies be made available to their infant. There was conflict among the medical team about what threshold of neonatal benefit could outweigh maternal and neonatal treatment burdens. A prenatal ethics consultation was requested. Pediatrics 2013;132:161-165.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)161-165
Number of pages5
JournalPediatrics
Volume132
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2013

Keywords

  • Cardiac surgery
  • Decision-making
  • Ethics
  • Trisomy 18

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ethics rounds: Trisomy 18 and complex congenital heart disease: Seeking the threshold benefit'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this