Ethics committees in state mental hospitals: A national survey

P. Backlar, Bentson McFarland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The goals of the study were to examine the composition, operation, and purpose of ethics committees in state mental hospitals, to determine whether committees were accessible to patients and family members, and to identify frequently addressed ethical issues. Methods: In June 1992 a 41-item survey questionnaire was mailed to chief executive officers of 204 state-operated general psychiatric inpatient facilities. Survey items asked about the facility's attributes, composition of the ethics committee, how the committee functioned, and the issues it addressed. Results: A total of 145 facilities from 46 states responded to the survey, for a response rate of 71 percent. Nearly half the facilities had ethics committees, most of which were recently established. Physicians accounted for the plurality of committee membership, followed by nurses and administrators. Although several facilities gave patients access to committee meetings, few patients or their family members actually attended these meetings. Issues such as patients' danger to others, resuscitation policies, and scarce resources were frequently addressed by many committees but were never addressed by others. Conclusions: Although many state mental hospitals have established ethics committees in the past few years, these committees may not meet patients' needs because of inadequate representation by patient advocates and family members. Numerous concerns were heard by committees, but no obvious patterns of pressing issues were revealed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)576-580
Number of pages5
JournalHospital and Community Psychiatry
Volume45
Issue number6
StatePublished - 1994
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Ethics Committees
State Hospitals
Psychiatric Hospitals
Resuscitation Orders
Committee Membership
Nurse Administrators
Ethics
Psychiatry
Surveys and Questionnaires
Inpatients
Physicians

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Ethics committees in state mental hospitals : A national survey. / Backlar, P.; McFarland, Bentson.

In: Hospital and Community Psychiatry, Vol. 45, No. 6, 1994, p. 576-580.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Backlar, P & McFarland, B 1994, 'Ethics committees in state mental hospitals: A national survey', Hospital and Community Psychiatry, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 576-580.
Backlar, P. ; McFarland, Bentson. / Ethics committees in state mental hospitals : A national survey. In: Hospital and Community Psychiatry. 1994 ; Vol. 45, No. 6. pp. 576-580.
@article{b8d31ec6f8364794872f2cb6ad313351,
title = "Ethics committees in state mental hospitals: A national survey",
abstract = "Objective: The goals of the study were to examine the composition, operation, and purpose of ethics committees in state mental hospitals, to determine whether committees were accessible to patients and family members, and to identify frequently addressed ethical issues. Methods: In June 1992 a 41-item survey questionnaire was mailed to chief executive officers of 204 state-operated general psychiatric inpatient facilities. Survey items asked about the facility's attributes, composition of the ethics committee, how the committee functioned, and the issues it addressed. Results: A total of 145 facilities from 46 states responded to the survey, for a response rate of 71 percent. Nearly half the facilities had ethics committees, most of which were recently established. Physicians accounted for the plurality of committee membership, followed by nurses and administrators. Although several facilities gave patients access to committee meetings, few patients or their family members actually attended these meetings. Issues such as patients' danger to others, resuscitation policies, and scarce resources were frequently addressed by many committees but were never addressed by others. Conclusions: Although many state mental hospitals have established ethics committees in the past few years, these committees may not meet patients' needs because of inadequate representation by patient advocates and family members. Numerous concerns were heard by committees, but no obvious patterns of pressing issues were revealed.",
author = "P. Backlar and Bentson McFarland",
year = "1994",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "576--580",
journal = "Psychiatric Services",
issn = "1075-2730",
publisher = "American Psychiatric Association",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ethics committees in state mental hospitals

T2 - A national survey

AU - Backlar, P.

AU - McFarland, Bentson

PY - 1994

Y1 - 1994

N2 - Objective: The goals of the study were to examine the composition, operation, and purpose of ethics committees in state mental hospitals, to determine whether committees were accessible to patients and family members, and to identify frequently addressed ethical issues. Methods: In June 1992 a 41-item survey questionnaire was mailed to chief executive officers of 204 state-operated general psychiatric inpatient facilities. Survey items asked about the facility's attributes, composition of the ethics committee, how the committee functioned, and the issues it addressed. Results: A total of 145 facilities from 46 states responded to the survey, for a response rate of 71 percent. Nearly half the facilities had ethics committees, most of which were recently established. Physicians accounted for the plurality of committee membership, followed by nurses and administrators. Although several facilities gave patients access to committee meetings, few patients or their family members actually attended these meetings. Issues such as patients' danger to others, resuscitation policies, and scarce resources were frequently addressed by many committees but were never addressed by others. Conclusions: Although many state mental hospitals have established ethics committees in the past few years, these committees may not meet patients' needs because of inadequate representation by patient advocates and family members. Numerous concerns were heard by committees, but no obvious patterns of pressing issues were revealed.

AB - Objective: The goals of the study were to examine the composition, operation, and purpose of ethics committees in state mental hospitals, to determine whether committees were accessible to patients and family members, and to identify frequently addressed ethical issues. Methods: In June 1992 a 41-item survey questionnaire was mailed to chief executive officers of 204 state-operated general psychiatric inpatient facilities. Survey items asked about the facility's attributes, composition of the ethics committee, how the committee functioned, and the issues it addressed. Results: A total of 145 facilities from 46 states responded to the survey, for a response rate of 71 percent. Nearly half the facilities had ethics committees, most of which were recently established. Physicians accounted for the plurality of committee membership, followed by nurses and administrators. Although several facilities gave patients access to committee meetings, few patients or their family members actually attended these meetings. Issues such as patients' danger to others, resuscitation policies, and scarce resources were frequently addressed by many committees but were never addressed by others. Conclusions: Although many state mental hospitals have established ethics committees in the past few years, these committees may not meet patients' needs because of inadequate representation by patient advocates and family members. Numerous concerns were heard by committees, but no obvious patterns of pressing issues were revealed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028298493&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028298493&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 8088738

AN - SCOPUS:0028298493

VL - 45

SP - 576

EP - 580

JO - Psychiatric Services

JF - Psychiatric Services

SN - 1075-2730

IS - 6

ER -