Ethics and managed care

Bentson McFarland, R. A. George

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The rise of managed care represents a shift of power away from consumers and providers of health services and towards those who pay the bills. In effect, managed care is redistributing society's resources. Of course, there is nothing unique to health care about the ethical problem of how to distribute the world's goods. Food, housing, education, and so forth are all distributed in such a way that some have more than others. Indeed, through no fault of their own, children may find themselves deprived of necessities. Given this situation, society is now looking at the decision-making process for determining which medical services actually are necessary. Health care providers have not heretofore had to compete for societal priorities with choices such as corporate profits, employee wages, public education, or other ways of using resources. This process of allocating resources ultimately requires thoughtful people to examine carefully the available data regarding outcomes (ie, benefits) and costs of medical services. Sadly, up to now the medical community has not made collecting such obviously useful information a significant priority. Not surprisingly, commercial entrepreneurs have exploited this vacuum by developing managed-care systems. To influence the resource-allocation process appropriately, healthcare providers must produce justification to use dollars for health care rather than for other essential services. Clinical impressions are not sufficient; data are required. Society is now demanding that health-care providers take up new roles as data collectors and evaluators. If clinicians fail to respond to this challenge these decisions inevitably will be made by others. This topic is addressed more fully in another article in this issue pertaining to the ethics of health care rationing.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)885-901
Number of pages17
JournalChild and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America
Volume4
Issue number4
StatePublished - 1995

Fingerprint

Managed Care Programs
Ethics
Health Personnel
Health Care Rationing
Delivery of Health Care
Education
Resource Allocation
Salaries and Fringe Benefits
Vacuum
Health Services
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Decision Making
Food

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

McFarland, B., & George, R. A. (1995). Ethics and managed care. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 4(4), 885-901.

Ethics and managed care. / McFarland, Bentson; George, R. A.

In: Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, Vol. 4, No. 4, 1995, p. 885-901.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

McFarland, B & George, RA 1995, 'Ethics and managed care', Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 885-901.
McFarland, Bentson ; George, R. A. / Ethics and managed care. In: Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America. 1995 ; Vol. 4, No. 4. pp. 885-901.
@article{354894fe811b42d19019e995270a30db,
title = "Ethics and managed care",
abstract = "The rise of managed care represents a shift of power away from consumers and providers of health services and towards those who pay the bills. In effect, managed care is redistributing society's resources. Of course, there is nothing unique to health care about the ethical problem of how to distribute the world's goods. Food, housing, education, and so forth are all distributed in such a way that some have more than others. Indeed, through no fault of their own, children may find themselves deprived of necessities. Given this situation, society is now looking at the decision-making process for determining which medical services actually are necessary. Health care providers have not heretofore had to compete for societal priorities with choices such as corporate profits, employee wages, public education, or other ways of using resources. This process of allocating resources ultimately requires thoughtful people to examine carefully the available data regarding outcomes (ie, benefits) and costs of medical services. Sadly, up to now the medical community has not made collecting such obviously useful information a significant priority. Not surprisingly, commercial entrepreneurs have exploited this vacuum by developing managed-care systems. To influence the resource-allocation process appropriately, healthcare providers must produce justification to use dollars for health care rather than for other essential services. Clinical impressions are not sufficient; data are required. Society is now demanding that health-care providers take up new roles as data collectors and evaluators. If clinicians fail to respond to this challenge these decisions inevitably will be made by others. This topic is addressed more fully in another article in this issue pertaining to the ethics of health care rationing.",
author = "Bentson McFarland and George, {R. A.}",
year = "1995",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "885--901",
journal = "Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America",
issn = "1056-4993",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ethics and managed care

AU - McFarland, Bentson

AU - George, R. A.

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

N2 - The rise of managed care represents a shift of power away from consumers and providers of health services and towards those who pay the bills. In effect, managed care is redistributing society's resources. Of course, there is nothing unique to health care about the ethical problem of how to distribute the world's goods. Food, housing, education, and so forth are all distributed in such a way that some have more than others. Indeed, through no fault of their own, children may find themselves deprived of necessities. Given this situation, society is now looking at the decision-making process for determining which medical services actually are necessary. Health care providers have not heretofore had to compete for societal priorities with choices such as corporate profits, employee wages, public education, or other ways of using resources. This process of allocating resources ultimately requires thoughtful people to examine carefully the available data regarding outcomes (ie, benefits) and costs of medical services. Sadly, up to now the medical community has not made collecting such obviously useful information a significant priority. Not surprisingly, commercial entrepreneurs have exploited this vacuum by developing managed-care systems. To influence the resource-allocation process appropriately, healthcare providers must produce justification to use dollars for health care rather than for other essential services. Clinical impressions are not sufficient; data are required. Society is now demanding that health-care providers take up new roles as data collectors and evaluators. If clinicians fail to respond to this challenge these decisions inevitably will be made by others. This topic is addressed more fully in another article in this issue pertaining to the ethics of health care rationing.

AB - The rise of managed care represents a shift of power away from consumers and providers of health services and towards those who pay the bills. In effect, managed care is redistributing society's resources. Of course, there is nothing unique to health care about the ethical problem of how to distribute the world's goods. Food, housing, education, and so forth are all distributed in such a way that some have more than others. Indeed, through no fault of their own, children may find themselves deprived of necessities. Given this situation, society is now looking at the decision-making process for determining which medical services actually are necessary. Health care providers have not heretofore had to compete for societal priorities with choices such as corporate profits, employee wages, public education, or other ways of using resources. This process of allocating resources ultimately requires thoughtful people to examine carefully the available data regarding outcomes (ie, benefits) and costs of medical services. Sadly, up to now the medical community has not made collecting such obviously useful information a significant priority. Not surprisingly, commercial entrepreneurs have exploited this vacuum by developing managed-care systems. To influence the resource-allocation process appropriately, healthcare providers must produce justification to use dollars for health care rather than for other essential services. Clinical impressions are not sufficient; data are required. Society is now demanding that health-care providers take up new roles as data collectors and evaluators. If clinicians fail to respond to this challenge these decisions inevitably will be made by others. This topic is addressed more fully in another article in this issue pertaining to the ethics of health care rationing.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028879185&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028879185&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 885

EP - 901

JO - Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America

JF - Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America

SN - 1056-4993

IS - 4

ER -