Ethical health policy work at the governmental level

David Pollack

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    In many of these cases, I tend to come down on the side of the dilemma that would support a public health or population-based solution. This means choosing a community-based option over individual rights or virtues, including the vested interests of the individual. This is especially true if the cost to the individual in question is not measured in terms of health or well-being, but more in economic terms. It is a question of civic or community virtues versus individual rights. Interestingly, when we were participating in the experiment of setting priorities for the Oregon Health Plan, we consciously tried to balance sets of competing principles: • the provision of "caring" as opposed to "curing," especially when the pursuit of a cure seemed counterproductive, futile, or insensitive; • the value to the community versus the value to the individual; and • the benefits of extending or saving lives in relation to the likelihood of a return to a level of function that is sufficient to make life meaningful. These same principles, and variations on them, can be applied to resolution of many of the dilemmas described above. It is not possible to provide more detailed discussions of these challenging issues in this article. However, the presentation of these issues and their complexity should underscore two basic assertions. Policy makers need clinically informed and ethically oriented experts to assist in the policy process. Likewise, health professionals have an ethical obligation to be aware of and, when feasible, to participate in the creation and resolution of health policy dilemmas.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)159-166
    Number of pages8
    JournalPsychiatric Annals
    Volume34
    Issue number2
    StatePublished - Feb 2004

    Fingerprint

    Health Policy
    Health Priorities
    Health
    Administrative Personnel
    Public Health
    Economics
    Costs and Cost Analysis
    Population

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Psychiatry and Mental health

    Cite this

    Ethical health policy work at the governmental level. / Pollack, David.

    In: Psychiatric Annals, Vol. 34, No. 2, 02.2004, p. 159-166.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Pollack, D 2004, 'Ethical health policy work at the governmental level', Psychiatric Annals, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 159-166.
    Pollack, David. / Ethical health policy work at the governmental level. In: Psychiatric Annals. 2004 ; Vol. 34, No. 2. pp. 159-166.
    @article{8a8ac6473ced4833be4545b5c8050568,
    title = "Ethical health policy work at the governmental level",
    abstract = "In many of these cases, I tend to come down on the side of the dilemma that would support a public health or population-based solution. This means choosing a community-based option over individual rights or virtues, including the vested interests of the individual. This is especially true if the cost to the individual in question is not measured in terms of health or well-being, but more in economic terms. It is a question of civic or community virtues versus individual rights. Interestingly, when we were participating in the experiment of setting priorities for the Oregon Health Plan, we consciously tried to balance sets of competing principles: • the provision of {"}caring{"} as opposed to {"}curing,{"} especially when the pursuit of a cure seemed counterproductive, futile, or insensitive; • the value to the community versus the value to the individual; and • the benefits of extending or saving lives in relation to the likelihood of a return to a level of function that is sufficient to make life meaningful. These same principles, and variations on them, can be applied to resolution of many of the dilemmas described above. It is not possible to provide more detailed discussions of these challenging issues in this article. However, the presentation of these issues and their complexity should underscore two basic assertions. Policy makers need clinically informed and ethically oriented experts to assist in the policy process. Likewise, health professionals have an ethical obligation to be aware of and, when feasible, to participate in the creation and resolution of health policy dilemmas.",
    author = "David Pollack",
    year = "2004",
    month = "2",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "34",
    pages = "159--166",
    journal = "Psychiatric Annals",
    issn = "0048-5713",
    publisher = "Slack Incorporated",
    number = "2",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Ethical health policy work at the governmental level

    AU - Pollack, David

    PY - 2004/2

    Y1 - 2004/2

    N2 - In many of these cases, I tend to come down on the side of the dilemma that would support a public health or population-based solution. This means choosing a community-based option over individual rights or virtues, including the vested interests of the individual. This is especially true if the cost to the individual in question is not measured in terms of health or well-being, but more in economic terms. It is a question of civic or community virtues versus individual rights. Interestingly, when we were participating in the experiment of setting priorities for the Oregon Health Plan, we consciously tried to balance sets of competing principles: • the provision of "caring" as opposed to "curing," especially when the pursuit of a cure seemed counterproductive, futile, or insensitive; • the value to the community versus the value to the individual; and • the benefits of extending or saving lives in relation to the likelihood of a return to a level of function that is sufficient to make life meaningful. These same principles, and variations on them, can be applied to resolution of many of the dilemmas described above. It is not possible to provide more detailed discussions of these challenging issues in this article. However, the presentation of these issues and their complexity should underscore two basic assertions. Policy makers need clinically informed and ethically oriented experts to assist in the policy process. Likewise, health professionals have an ethical obligation to be aware of and, when feasible, to participate in the creation and resolution of health policy dilemmas.

    AB - In many of these cases, I tend to come down on the side of the dilemma that would support a public health or population-based solution. This means choosing a community-based option over individual rights or virtues, including the vested interests of the individual. This is especially true if the cost to the individual in question is not measured in terms of health or well-being, but more in economic terms. It is a question of civic or community virtues versus individual rights. Interestingly, when we were participating in the experiment of setting priorities for the Oregon Health Plan, we consciously tried to balance sets of competing principles: • the provision of "caring" as opposed to "curing," especially when the pursuit of a cure seemed counterproductive, futile, or insensitive; • the value to the community versus the value to the individual; and • the benefits of extending or saving lives in relation to the likelihood of a return to a level of function that is sufficient to make life meaningful. These same principles, and variations on them, can be applied to resolution of many of the dilemmas described above. It is not possible to provide more detailed discussions of these challenging issues in this article. However, the presentation of these issues and their complexity should underscore two basic assertions. Policy makers need clinically informed and ethically oriented experts to assist in the policy process. Likewise, health professionals have an ethical obligation to be aware of and, when feasible, to participate in the creation and resolution of health policy dilemmas.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=2042542754&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=2042542754&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:2042542754

    VL - 34

    SP - 159

    EP - 166

    JO - Psychiatric Annals

    JF - Psychiatric Annals

    SN - 0048-5713

    IS - 2

    ER -