Ethical considerations of complementary and alternative medical therapies in conventional medical settings

Karen Adams, Michael H. Cohen, David Eisenberg, Albert R. Jonsen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

98 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Increasing use of complementary and alternative medical (CAM) therapies by patients, health care providers, and institutions has made it imperative that physicians consider their ethical obligations when recommending, tolerating, or proscribing these therapies. The authors present a risk-benefit framework that can be applied to determine the appropriateness of using CAM therapies in various clinical scenarios. The major relevant issues are the severity and acuteness of illness; the curability of the illness by conventional forms of treatment; the degree of invasiveness, associated toxicities, and side effects of the conventional treatment; the availability and quality of evidence of utility and safety of the desired CAM treatment; the level of understanding of risks and benefits of the CAM treatment combined with the patient's knowing and voluntary acceptance of those risks; and the patient's persistence of intention to use CAM therapies. Even in the absence of scientific evidence for CAM therapies, by considering these relevant issues, providers can formulate a plan that is clinically sound, ethically appropriate, and targeted to the unique circumstances of individual patients. Physicians are encouraged to remain engaged in problem-solving with their patients and to attempt to elucidate and clarify the patient's core values and beliefs when counseling about CAM therapies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)660-664
Number of pages5
JournalAnnals of Internal Medicine
Volume137
Issue number8
StatePublished - Oct 15 2002

Fingerprint

Complementary Therapies
Physicians
Therapeutics
Health Personnel
Counseling
Patient Care
Safety

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Ethical considerations of complementary and alternative medical therapies in conventional medical settings. / Adams, Karen; Cohen, Michael H.; Eisenberg, David; Jonsen, Albert R.

In: Annals of Internal Medicine, Vol. 137, No. 8, 15.10.2002, p. 660-664.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Adams, Karen ; Cohen, Michael H. ; Eisenberg, David ; Jonsen, Albert R. / Ethical considerations of complementary and alternative medical therapies in conventional medical settings. In: Annals of Internal Medicine. 2002 ; Vol. 137, No. 8. pp. 660-664.
@article{44cb177d70204025a13fecda82c1b381,
title = "Ethical considerations of complementary and alternative medical therapies in conventional medical settings",
abstract = "Increasing use of complementary and alternative medical (CAM) therapies by patients, health care providers, and institutions has made it imperative that physicians consider their ethical obligations when recommending, tolerating, or proscribing these therapies. The authors present a risk-benefit framework that can be applied to determine the appropriateness of using CAM therapies in various clinical scenarios. The major relevant issues are the severity and acuteness of illness; the curability of the illness by conventional forms of treatment; the degree of invasiveness, associated toxicities, and side effects of the conventional treatment; the availability and quality of evidence of utility and safety of the desired CAM treatment; the level of understanding of risks and benefits of the CAM treatment combined with the patient's knowing and voluntary acceptance of those risks; and the patient's persistence of intention to use CAM therapies. Even in the absence of scientific evidence for CAM therapies, by considering these relevant issues, providers can formulate a plan that is clinically sound, ethically appropriate, and targeted to the unique circumstances of individual patients. Physicians are encouraged to remain engaged in problem-solving with their patients and to attempt to elucidate and clarify the patient's core values and beliefs when counseling about CAM therapies.",
author = "Karen Adams and Cohen, {Michael H.} and David Eisenberg and Jonsen, {Albert R.}",
year = "2002",
month = "10",
day = "15",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "137",
pages = "660--664",
journal = "Annals of Internal Medicine",
issn = "0003-4819",
publisher = "American College of Physicians",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ethical considerations of complementary and alternative medical therapies in conventional medical settings

AU - Adams, Karen

AU - Cohen, Michael H.

AU - Eisenberg, David

AU - Jonsen, Albert R.

PY - 2002/10/15

Y1 - 2002/10/15

N2 - Increasing use of complementary and alternative medical (CAM) therapies by patients, health care providers, and institutions has made it imperative that physicians consider their ethical obligations when recommending, tolerating, or proscribing these therapies. The authors present a risk-benefit framework that can be applied to determine the appropriateness of using CAM therapies in various clinical scenarios. The major relevant issues are the severity and acuteness of illness; the curability of the illness by conventional forms of treatment; the degree of invasiveness, associated toxicities, and side effects of the conventional treatment; the availability and quality of evidence of utility and safety of the desired CAM treatment; the level of understanding of risks and benefits of the CAM treatment combined with the patient's knowing and voluntary acceptance of those risks; and the patient's persistence of intention to use CAM therapies. Even in the absence of scientific evidence for CAM therapies, by considering these relevant issues, providers can formulate a plan that is clinically sound, ethically appropriate, and targeted to the unique circumstances of individual patients. Physicians are encouraged to remain engaged in problem-solving with their patients and to attempt to elucidate and clarify the patient's core values and beliefs when counseling about CAM therapies.

AB - Increasing use of complementary and alternative medical (CAM) therapies by patients, health care providers, and institutions has made it imperative that physicians consider their ethical obligations when recommending, tolerating, or proscribing these therapies. The authors present a risk-benefit framework that can be applied to determine the appropriateness of using CAM therapies in various clinical scenarios. The major relevant issues are the severity and acuteness of illness; the curability of the illness by conventional forms of treatment; the degree of invasiveness, associated toxicities, and side effects of the conventional treatment; the availability and quality of evidence of utility and safety of the desired CAM treatment; the level of understanding of risks and benefits of the CAM treatment combined with the patient's knowing and voluntary acceptance of those risks; and the patient's persistence of intention to use CAM therapies. Even in the absence of scientific evidence for CAM therapies, by considering these relevant issues, providers can formulate a plan that is clinically sound, ethically appropriate, and targeted to the unique circumstances of individual patients. Physicians are encouraged to remain engaged in problem-solving with their patients and to attempt to elucidate and clarify the patient's core values and beliefs when counseling about CAM therapies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037108649&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037108649&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 12379066

AN - SCOPUS:0037108649

VL - 137

SP - 660

EP - 664

JO - Annals of Internal Medicine

JF - Annals of Internal Medicine

SN - 0003-4819

IS - 8

ER -