Establishment of a varicose vein center in a tertiary vascular surgery practice

Urban versus rural differences

Syed M. Hussain, Robert Mclafferty, Marc A. Passman, Jeffrey B. Datillo, Don E. Ramsey, Raoul J. Guzman, Thomas C. Naslund, Kim J. Hodgson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We examined changes in practice patterns after the establishment of a varicose vein center (VVC) within two tertiary university vascular surgery practices and compared differences between urban (U) and rural (R) sites. Practice patterns for the treatment of VVs were compared 3 years before (period 1) and 3 years after (period 2) the formation of a U-VVC and an R-VVC in 2001. Both VVCs were part of similar-sized tertiary vascular surgery practices. Evaluation was specific to VVs, reticular veins, and telangiectasias. Prior to U-VVC, there were 338 office visits, six office procedures, and 114 hospital procedures. After U-VVC, there were 624, 120, and 312, respectively. Prior to R-VVC, there were 85 office visits, five office procedures, and 69 hospital procedures. After R-VVC, there were 528, 163, and 303, respectively. In period 1 for U-VVC and R-VVC, VVC relative value unit (RVU) generation as a percent of total practice RVUs was 1.0% and 0.7%, respectively. In period 2 for U-VVC and R-VVC, VVC RVU generation as a percent of total practice RVUs was 2.6% and 2.5%, respectively. In an effort to provide more coordinated treatment for patients with VVs, establishing a VVC within a tertiary academic vascular surgery practice can lead to rapid expansion of clinical volume by increased office visits, office procedures, and hospital procedures. Clinical demand for evaluation and treatment of VVs showed little variation between R-VVC and U-VVC.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)447-450
Number of pages4
JournalAnnals of Vascular Surgery
Volume20
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Varicose Veins
Blood Vessels
Office Visits
Telangiectasis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

Establishment of a varicose vein center in a tertiary vascular surgery practice : Urban versus rural differences. / Hussain, Syed M.; Mclafferty, Robert; Passman, Marc A.; Datillo, Jeffrey B.; Ramsey, Don E.; Guzman, Raoul J.; Naslund, Thomas C.; Hodgson, Kim J.

In: Annals of Vascular Surgery, Vol. 20, No. 4, 07.2006, p. 447-450.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hussain, SM, Mclafferty, R, Passman, MA, Datillo, JB, Ramsey, DE, Guzman, RJ, Naslund, TC & Hodgson, KJ 2006, 'Establishment of a varicose vein center in a tertiary vascular surgery practice: Urban versus rural differences', Annals of Vascular Surgery, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 447-450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10016-006-9092-1
Hussain, Syed M. ; Mclafferty, Robert ; Passman, Marc A. ; Datillo, Jeffrey B. ; Ramsey, Don E. ; Guzman, Raoul J. ; Naslund, Thomas C. ; Hodgson, Kim J. / Establishment of a varicose vein center in a tertiary vascular surgery practice : Urban versus rural differences. In: Annals of Vascular Surgery. 2006 ; Vol. 20, No. 4. pp. 447-450.
@article{7111a66e696a43819436701f6378e979,
title = "Establishment of a varicose vein center in a tertiary vascular surgery practice: Urban versus rural differences",
abstract = "We examined changes in practice patterns after the establishment of a varicose vein center (VVC) within two tertiary university vascular surgery practices and compared differences between urban (U) and rural (R) sites. Practice patterns for the treatment of VVs were compared 3 years before (period 1) and 3 years after (period 2) the formation of a U-VVC and an R-VVC in 2001. Both VVCs were part of similar-sized tertiary vascular surgery practices. Evaluation was specific to VVs, reticular veins, and telangiectasias. Prior to U-VVC, there were 338 office visits, six office procedures, and 114 hospital procedures. After U-VVC, there were 624, 120, and 312, respectively. Prior to R-VVC, there were 85 office visits, five office procedures, and 69 hospital procedures. After R-VVC, there were 528, 163, and 303, respectively. In period 1 for U-VVC and R-VVC, VVC relative value unit (RVU) generation as a percent of total practice RVUs was 1.0{\%} and 0.7{\%}, respectively. In period 2 for U-VVC and R-VVC, VVC RVU generation as a percent of total practice RVUs was 2.6{\%} and 2.5{\%}, respectively. In an effort to provide more coordinated treatment for patients with VVs, establishing a VVC within a tertiary academic vascular surgery practice can lead to rapid expansion of clinical volume by increased office visits, office procedures, and hospital procedures. Clinical demand for evaluation and treatment of VVs showed little variation between R-VVC and U-VVC.",
author = "Hussain, {Syed M.} and Robert Mclafferty and Passman, {Marc A.} and Datillo, {Jeffrey B.} and Ramsey, {Don E.} and Guzman, {Raoul J.} and Naslund, {Thomas C.} and Hodgson, {Kim J.}",
year = "2006",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1007/s10016-006-9092-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "447--450",
journal = "Annals of Vascular Surgery",
issn = "0890-5096",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Establishment of a varicose vein center in a tertiary vascular surgery practice

T2 - Urban versus rural differences

AU - Hussain, Syed M.

AU - Mclafferty, Robert

AU - Passman, Marc A.

AU - Datillo, Jeffrey B.

AU - Ramsey, Don E.

AU - Guzman, Raoul J.

AU - Naslund, Thomas C.

AU - Hodgson, Kim J.

PY - 2006/7

Y1 - 2006/7

N2 - We examined changes in practice patterns after the establishment of a varicose vein center (VVC) within two tertiary university vascular surgery practices and compared differences between urban (U) and rural (R) sites. Practice patterns for the treatment of VVs were compared 3 years before (period 1) and 3 years after (period 2) the formation of a U-VVC and an R-VVC in 2001. Both VVCs were part of similar-sized tertiary vascular surgery practices. Evaluation was specific to VVs, reticular veins, and telangiectasias. Prior to U-VVC, there were 338 office visits, six office procedures, and 114 hospital procedures. After U-VVC, there were 624, 120, and 312, respectively. Prior to R-VVC, there were 85 office visits, five office procedures, and 69 hospital procedures. After R-VVC, there were 528, 163, and 303, respectively. In period 1 for U-VVC and R-VVC, VVC relative value unit (RVU) generation as a percent of total practice RVUs was 1.0% and 0.7%, respectively. In period 2 for U-VVC and R-VVC, VVC RVU generation as a percent of total practice RVUs was 2.6% and 2.5%, respectively. In an effort to provide more coordinated treatment for patients with VVs, establishing a VVC within a tertiary academic vascular surgery practice can lead to rapid expansion of clinical volume by increased office visits, office procedures, and hospital procedures. Clinical demand for evaluation and treatment of VVs showed little variation between R-VVC and U-VVC.

AB - We examined changes in practice patterns after the establishment of a varicose vein center (VVC) within two tertiary university vascular surgery practices and compared differences between urban (U) and rural (R) sites. Practice patterns for the treatment of VVs were compared 3 years before (period 1) and 3 years after (period 2) the formation of a U-VVC and an R-VVC in 2001. Both VVCs were part of similar-sized tertiary vascular surgery practices. Evaluation was specific to VVs, reticular veins, and telangiectasias. Prior to U-VVC, there were 338 office visits, six office procedures, and 114 hospital procedures. After U-VVC, there were 624, 120, and 312, respectively. Prior to R-VVC, there were 85 office visits, five office procedures, and 69 hospital procedures. After R-VVC, there were 528, 163, and 303, respectively. In period 1 for U-VVC and R-VVC, VVC relative value unit (RVU) generation as a percent of total practice RVUs was 1.0% and 0.7%, respectively. In period 2 for U-VVC and R-VVC, VVC RVU generation as a percent of total practice RVUs was 2.6% and 2.5%, respectively. In an effort to provide more coordinated treatment for patients with VVs, establishing a VVC within a tertiary academic vascular surgery practice can lead to rapid expansion of clinical volume by increased office visits, office procedures, and hospital procedures. Clinical demand for evaluation and treatment of VVs showed little variation between R-VVC and U-VVC.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33748585689&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33748585689&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10016-006-9092-1

DO - 10.1007/s10016-006-9092-1

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 447

EP - 450

JO - Annals of Vascular Surgery

JF - Annals of Vascular Surgery

SN - 0890-5096

IS - 4

ER -