Epidemiology of Animal Exposures Presenting to Emergency Departments

Mark T. Steele, O. John Ma, Janet Nakase, Gregory J. Moran, William R. Mower, Samuel Ong, Anusha Krishnadasan, David A. Talan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

27 Scopus citations


Objectives: To describe the epidemiology of emergency department mammalian animal exposures and to compare adult and pediatric exposure characteristics. Methods: This was a prospective case series of patients presenting with animal exposure-related complaints from July 1996 to July 1998. Eleven university-affiliated, geographically diverse, urban emergency departments (EMERGEncy ID NET) participated. Results: A total of 1,631 exposures (80.5%) were from dogs, 267 (13.2%) from cats, 88 (4.3%) from rodents or rabbits, 18 (0.9%) from raccoons and wild carnivores, eight (0.4%) from livestock, nine (0.4%) from monkeys, and five (0.2%) from bats. Compared with adults, children were more likely to be bitten by dogs (odds ratio [OR], 2.9; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.2 to 3.8) or hamsters, gerbils, and rabbits (OR, 2.6; 95% CI = 0.79 to 9.2); to be bitten on the head, neck, or face (OR, 6.7; 95% CI = 5.2 to 8.6); and to be petting or playing with the animal at the time of exposure (OR, 2.6; 95% CI = 2.1 to 3.3). Conclusions: Animal exposures are a common source of injury seen in the emergency department. These findings have potentially important public health implications in terms of emphasizing the need to effectively implement education programs for parents and children.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)398-403
Number of pages6
JournalAcademic Emergency Medicine
Issue number5
StatePublished - May 2007


  • bites
  • cats
  • dogs
  • emergency
  • epidemiology
  • stings

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine


Dive into the research topics of 'Epidemiology of Animal Exposures Presenting to Emergency Departments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this