Epidemiology and biostatistics

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Epidemiology and biostatistics are two of the foundations of public health science and practice (Institute of Medicine, 1988). Graduate and undergraduate degrees in schools of public health all include some level of training in these basic disciplines. As an epidemiologist, I consider the training to be vital to provide future researchers and practitioners of public health the analytic reasoning and interpretation skills to (1) understand and interpret research publications, (2) plan and execute research and evaluation studies, (3) provide scientific information about causal evidence, and (4) use information about risk factors and cause to shape programs and policies. For public health practitioners who are epidemiology specialists, the training and the skill set is more complex and expansive. When teaching the complexity of analytic reasoning in epidemiology, we often search for relevant, real world examples that permit us to impart both methods and broader public health content. Disability epidemiology provides a rich opportunity on both counts. It offers intellectually stimulating examples on issues that span the disciplines of both epidemiology and biostatistics. These issues, some of which are discussed in this chapter, relate to everything from pragmatic problems in field research to theoretical frameworks about the impact of risk factors across multiple levels of personal and environmental influences. Special populations, including people with disability (PWD), also offer an opportunity to examine and grapple with the public health challenge of disparities, and through that challenge, to help the disciplines of epidemiology and biostatistics to evolve. Unfortunately, there is an uneasy and even disrespectful relationship between the disability world and the world of public health, including epidemiology, when such an interface exists at all.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationPublic Health Perspectives on Disability: Epidemiology to Ethics and Beyond
PublisherSpringer New York
Pages15-54
Number of pages40
ISBN (Print)9781441973405
DOIs
StatePublished - 2011
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Biostatistics
Epidemiology
Public Health
Research
Public Health Practice
Public Health Schools
National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine (U.S.) Health and Medicine Division
Disabled Persons
Publications
Teaching
Research Personnel

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Andresen, E. (2011). Epidemiology and biostatistics. In Public Health Perspectives on Disability: Epidemiology to Ethics and Beyond (pp. 15-54). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7341-2_2

Epidemiology and biostatistics. / Andresen, Elena.

Public Health Perspectives on Disability: Epidemiology to Ethics and Beyond. Springer New York, 2011. p. 15-54.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Andresen, E 2011, Epidemiology and biostatistics. in Public Health Perspectives on Disability: Epidemiology to Ethics and Beyond. Springer New York, pp. 15-54. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7341-2_2
Andresen E. Epidemiology and biostatistics. In Public Health Perspectives on Disability: Epidemiology to Ethics and Beyond. Springer New York. 2011. p. 15-54 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7341-2_2
Andresen, Elena. / Epidemiology and biostatistics. Public Health Perspectives on Disability: Epidemiology to Ethics and Beyond. Springer New York, 2011. pp. 15-54
@inbook{8beac634ed264047909d979c786cea0f,
title = "Epidemiology and biostatistics",
abstract = "Epidemiology and biostatistics are two of the foundations of public health science and practice (Institute of Medicine, 1988). Graduate and undergraduate degrees in schools of public health all include some level of training in these basic disciplines. As an epidemiologist, I consider the training to be vital to provide future researchers and practitioners of public health the analytic reasoning and interpretation skills to (1) understand and interpret research publications, (2) plan and execute research and evaluation studies, (3) provide scientific information about causal evidence, and (4) use information about risk factors and cause to shape programs and policies. For public health practitioners who are epidemiology specialists, the training and the skill set is more complex and expansive. When teaching the complexity of analytic reasoning in epidemiology, we often search for relevant, real world examples that permit us to impart both methods and broader public health content. Disability epidemiology provides a rich opportunity on both counts. It offers intellectually stimulating examples on issues that span the disciplines of both epidemiology and biostatistics. These issues, some of which are discussed in this chapter, relate to everything from pragmatic problems in field research to theoretical frameworks about the impact of risk factors across multiple levels of personal and environmental influences. Special populations, including people with disability (PWD), also offer an opportunity to examine and grapple with the public health challenge of disparities, and through that challenge, to help the disciplines of epidemiology and biostatistics to evolve. Unfortunately, there is an uneasy and even disrespectful relationship between the disability world and the world of public health, including epidemiology, when such an interface exists at all.",
author = "Elena Andresen",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1007/978-1-4419-7341-2_2",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781441973405",
pages = "15--54",
booktitle = "Public Health Perspectives on Disability: Epidemiology to Ethics and Beyond",
publisher = "Springer New York",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Epidemiology and biostatistics

AU - Andresen, Elena

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Epidemiology and biostatistics are two of the foundations of public health science and practice (Institute of Medicine, 1988). Graduate and undergraduate degrees in schools of public health all include some level of training in these basic disciplines. As an epidemiologist, I consider the training to be vital to provide future researchers and practitioners of public health the analytic reasoning and interpretation skills to (1) understand and interpret research publications, (2) plan and execute research and evaluation studies, (3) provide scientific information about causal evidence, and (4) use information about risk factors and cause to shape programs and policies. For public health practitioners who are epidemiology specialists, the training and the skill set is more complex and expansive. When teaching the complexity of analytic reasoning in epidemiology, we often search for relevant, real world examples that permit us to impart both methods and broader public health content. Disability epidemiology provides a rich opportunity on both counts. It offers intellectually stimulating examples on issues that span the disciplines of both epidemiology and biostatistics. These issues, some of which are discussed in this chapter, relate to everything from pragmatic problems in field research to theoretical frameworks about the impact of risk factors across multiple levels of personal and environmental influences. Special populations, including people with disability (PWD), also offer an opportunity to examine and grapple with the public health challenge of disparities, and through that challenge, to help the disciplines of epidemiology and biostatistics to evolve. Unfortunately, there is an uneasy and even disrespectful relationship between the disability world and the world of public health, including epidemiology, when such an interface exists at all.

AB - Epidemiology and biostatistics are two of the foundations of public health science and practice (Institute of Medicine, 1988). Graduate and undergraduate degrees in schools of public health all include some level of training in these basic disciplines. As an epidemiologist, I consider the training to be vital to provide future researchers and practitioners of public health the analytic reasoning and interpretation skills to (1) understand and interpret research publications, (2) plan and execute research and evaluation studies, (3) provide scientific information about causal evidence, and (4) use information about risk factors and cause to shape programs and policies. For public health practitioners who are epidemiology specialists, the training and the skill set is more complex and expansive. When teaching the complexity of analytic reasoning in epidemiology, we often search for relevant, real world examples that permit us to impart both methods and broader public health content. Disability epidemiology provides a rich opportunity on both counts. It offers intellectually stimulating examples on issues that span the disciplines of both epidemiology and biostatistics. These issues, some of which are discussed in this chapter, relate to everything from pragmatic problems in field research to theoretical frameworks about the impact of risk factors across multiple levels of personal and environmental influences. Special populations, including people with disability (PWD), also offer an opportunity to examine and grapple with the public health challenge of disparities, and through that challenge, to help the disciplines of epidemiology and biostatistics to evolve. Unfortunately, there is an uneasy and even disrespectful relationship between the disability world and the world of public health, including epidemiology, when such an interface exists at all.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84892020284&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84892020284&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-1-4419-7341-2_2

DO - 10.1007/978-1-4419-7341-2_2

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84892020284

SN - 9781441973405

SP - 15

EP - 54

BT - Public Health Perspectives on Disability: Epidemiology to Ethics and Beyond

PB - Springer New York

ER -