Enhancing screening systems to facilitate hearing-healthcare access: A qualitative study

Kathleen Carlson, Sara Sell, Jay Vachhani, Robert L. Folmer, Gabrielle Saunders, M. Patrick Feeney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Although hearing loss is a common health issue, hearing healthcare (HHC) is poorly accessed. Screening to identify hearing loss is an important part of HHC access, specifically for those who screen positive for hearing loss and would benefit from seeing a HHC provider. New technologies can be automated to provide information and recommendations that are tailored to the needs of individual users, potentially enhancing rates of HHC access after positive screens. A greater understanding of the facilitators of postscreening HHC access that could be leveraged in such systems is needed. Purpose: The purpose of this project was to identify facilitators of postscreening HHC access that can be used in automated screening systems. Research Design: This qualitative study used focus groups (FGs) to understand perceived barriers, perceived benefits, and potential cues to action, as informed by the Health Belief Model, for accessing HHC after use of automated hearing screening systems. Study Sample: Fifty individuals participated in one of seven FGs. FGs were conducted separately with three types of stakeholders: four FGs included adults who reported some degree of perceived hearing loss and had recently completed a hearing screening; two FGs included adults who had recently sought HHC for the first time because of hearing loss; and one FG involved significant others/family members of individuals with hearing loss. Data Collection and Analysis: FGs were 60–90 minutes in length and were led by a trained facilitator following a discussion guide. A research audiologist was present at each FG and served as a notetaker. FGs were recorded and transcribed by research team members, and transcripts were then coded in an iterative process by multiple team members. Qualitative content analysis was used to reduce data and to identify salient themes and subthemes, following an inductive approach. We focused on identifying themes that were related to facilitators of HHC access after positive screens for hearing loss and, separately, potential enhancements to automated hearing screening systems that would leverage these facilitators to improve HHC access. Results: We identified five key themes related to HHC access after a positive screen for hearing loss, along with ideas for enhancing automated hearing screening systems based on these themes. The themes included knowledge, trust, access, quality of life, and interpersonal influence. Conclusions: The results of our work help inform the development of innovative hearing screening systems that can be automated to leverage individual facilitators of HHC access.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)250-263
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of the American Academy of Audiology
Volume30
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2019

Fingerprint

Hearing
Delivery of Health Care
Focus Groups
Hearing Loss
Health
Research
Health Personnel
Cues
Research Design

Keywords

  • Audiology
  • Auditory rehabilitation
  • Hearing
  • Hearing healthcare
  • Kiosk
  • Screening

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Speech and Hearing

Cite this

Enhancing screening systems to facilitate hearing-healthcare access : A qualitative study. / Carlson, Kathleen; Sell, Sara; Vachhani, Jay; Folmer, Robert L.; Saunders, Gabrielle; Patrick Feeney, M.

In: Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, Vol. 30, No. 4, 01.04.2019, p. 250-263.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Carlson, Kathleen ; Sell, Sara ; Vachhani, Jay ; Folmer, Robert L. ; Saunders, Gabrielle ; Patrick Feeney, M. / Enhancing screening systems to facilitate hearing-healthcare access : A qualitative study. In: Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 2019 ; Vol. 30, No. 4. pp. 250-263.
@article{796be7ad533246d2a4b39ed40880fa9c,
title = "Enhancing screening systems to facilitate hearing-healthcare access: A qualitative study",
abstract = "Background: Although hearing loss is a common health issue, hearing healthcare (HHC) is poorly accessed. Screening to identify hearing loss is an important part of HHC access, specifically for those who screen positive for hearing loss and would benefit from seeing a HHC provider. New technologies can be automated to provide information and recommendations that are tailored to the needs of individual users, potentially enhancing rates of HHC access after positive screens. A greater understanding of the facilitators of postscreening HHC access that could be leveraged in such systems is needed. Purpose: The purpose of this project was to identify facilitators of postscreening HHC access that can be used in automated screening systems. Research Design: This qualitative study used focus groups (FGs) to understand perceived barriers, perceived benefits, and potential cues to action, as informed by the Health Belief Model, for accessing HHC after use of automated hearing screening systems. Study Sample: Fifty individuals participated in one of seven FGs. FGs were conducted separately with three types of stakeholders: four FGs included adults who reported some degree of perceived hearing loss and had recently completed a hearing screening; two FGs included adults who had recently sought HHC for the first time because of hearing loss; and one FG involved significant others/family members of individuals with hearing loss. Data Collection and Analysis: FGs were 60–90 minutes in length and were led by a trained facilitator following a discussion guide. A research audiologist was present at each FG and served as a notetaker. FGs were recorded and transcribed by research team members, and transcripts were then coded in an iterative process by multiple team members. Qualitative content analysis was used to reduce data and to identify salient themes and subthemes, following an inductive approach. We focused on identifying themes that were related to facilitators of HHC access after positive screens for hearing loss and, separately, potential enhancements to automated hearing screening systems that would leverage these facilitators to improve HHC access. Results: We identified five key themes related to HHC access after a positive screen for hearing loss, along with ideas for enhancing automated hearing screening systems based on these themes. The themes included knowledge, trust, access, quality of life, and interpersonal influence. Conclusions: The results of our work help inform the development of innovative hearing screening systems that can be automated to leverage individual facilitators of HHC access.",
keywords = "Audiology, Auditory rehabilitation, Hearing, Hearing healthcare, Kiosk, Screening",
author = "Kathleen Carlson and Sara Sell and Jay Vachhani and Folmer, {Robert L.} and Gabrielle Saunders and {Patrick Feeney}, M.",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3766/jaaa.15087",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "250--263",
journal = "Journal of the American Academy of Audiology",
issn = "1050-0545",
publisher = "American Academy of Audiology",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Enhancing screening systems to facilitate hearing-healthcare access

T2 - A qualitative study

AU - Carlson, Kathleen

AU - Sell, Sara

AU - Vachhani, Jay

AU - Folmer, Robert L.

AU - Saunders, Gabrielle

AU - Patrick Feeney, M.

PY - 2019/4/1

Y1 - 2019/4/1

N2 - Background: Although hearing loss is a common health issue, hearing healthcare (HHC) is poorly accessed. Screening to identify hearing loss is an important part of HHC access, specifically for those who screen positive for hearing loss and would benefit from seeing a HHC provider. New technologies can be automated to provide information and recommendations that are tailored to the needs of individual users, potentially enhancing rates of HHC access after positive screens. A greater understanding of the facilitators of postscreening HHC access that could be leveraged in such systems is needed. Purpose: The purpose of this project was to identify facilitators of postscreening HHC access that can be used in automated screening systems. Research Design: This qualitative study used focus groups (FGs) to understand perceived barriers, perceived benefits, and potential cues to action, as informed by the Health Belief Model, for accessing HHC after use of automated hearing screening systems. Study Sample: Fifty individuals participated in one of seven FGs. FGs were conducted separately with three types of stakeholders: four FGs included adults who reported some degree of perceived hearing loss and had recently completed a hearing screening; two FGs included adults who had recently sought HHC for the first time because of hearing loss; and one FG involved significant others/family members of individuals with hearing loss. Data Collection and Analysis: FGs were 60–90 minutes in length and were led by a trained facilitator following a discussion guide. A research audiologist was present at each FG and served as a notetaker. FGs were recorded and transcribed by research team members, and transcripts were then coded in an iterative process by multiple team members. Qualitative content analysis was used to reduce data and to identify salient themes and subthemes, following an inductive approach. We focused on identifying themes that were related to facilitators of HHC access after positive screens for hearing loss and, separately, potential enhancements to automated hearing screening systems that would leverage these facilitators to improve HHC access. Results: We identified five key themes related to HHC access after a positive screen for hearing loss, along with ideas for enhancing automated hearing screening systems based on these themes. The themes included knowledge, trust, access, quality of life, and interpersonal influence. Conclusions: The results of our work help inform the development of innovative hearing screening systems that can be automated to leverage individual facilitators of HHC access.

AB - Background: Although hearing loss is a common health issue, hearing healthcare (HHC) is poorly accessed. Screening to identify hearing loss is an important part of HHC access, specifically for those who screen positive for hearing loss and would benefit from seeing a HHC provider. New technologies can be automated to provide information and recommendations that are tailored to the needs of individual users, potentially enhancing rates of HHC access after positive screens. A greater understanding of the facilitators of postscreening HHC access that could be leveraged in such systems is needed. Purpose: The purpose of this project was to identify facilitators of postscreening HHC access that can be used in automated screening systems. Research Design: This qualitative study used focus groups (FGs) to understand perceived barriers, perceived benefits, and potential cues to action, as informed by the Health Belief Model, for accessing HHC after use of automated hearing screening systems. Study Sample: Fifty individuals participated in one of seven FGs. FGs were conducted separately with three types of stakeholders: four FGs included adults who reported some degree of perceived hearing loss and had recently completed a hearing screening; two FGs included adults who had recently sought HHC for the first time because of hearing loss; and one FG involved significant others/family members of individuals with hearing loss. Data Collection and Analysis: FGs were 60–90 minutes in length and were led by a trained facilitator following a discussion guide. A research audiologist was present at each FG and served as a notetaker. FGs were recorded and transcribed by research team members, and transcripts were then coded in an iterative process by multiple team members. Qualitative content analysis was used to reduce data and to identify salient themes and subthemes, following an inductive approach. We focused on identifying themes that were related to facilitators of HHC access after positive screens for hearing loss and, separately, potential enhancements to automated hearing screening systems that would leverage these facilitators to improve HHC access. Results: We identified five key themes related to HHC access after a positive screen for hearing loss, along with ideas for enhancing automated hearing screening systems based on these themes. The themes included knowledge, trust, access, quality of life, and interpersonal influence. Conclusions: The results of our work help inform the development of innovative hearing screening systems that can be automated to leverage individual facilitators of HHC access.

KW - Audiology

KW - Auditory rehabilitation

KW - Hearing

KW - Hearing healthcare

KW - Kiosk

KW - Screening

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065129007&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065129007&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3766/jaaa.15087

DO - 10.3766/jaaa.15087

M3 - Article

C2 - 30461385

AN - SCOPUS:85065129007

VL - 30

SP - 250

EP - 263

JO - Journal of the American Academy of Audiology

JF - Journal of the American Academy of Audiology

SN - 1050-0545

IS - 4

ER -