Engaging the underserved: A process model to mobilize rural community health coalitions as partners in translational research

Melinda Davis, Susan Aromaa, Paul B. McGinnis, Katrina Ramsey, Nancy Rollins, Jamie Smith, Beth Ann Beamer, David Buckley, Kurt C. Stange, Lyle Fagnan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Community engagement (CE) and community-engaged research (CEnR) are increasingly recognized as critical elements in research translation. Process models to develop CEnR partnerships in rural and underserved communities are needed. Method: Academic partners transformed four established Community Health Improvement Partnerships (CHIPs) into Community Health Improvement and Research Partnerships (CHIRPs). The intervention consisted of three elements: an academic-community kickoff/orientation meeting, delivery of eight research training modules to CHIRP members, and local community-based participatory research (CBPR) pilot studies addressing childhood obesity. We conducted a mixed methods analysis of pre-/postsurveys, interviews, session evaluations, observational field notes, and attendance logs to evaluate intervention effectiveness and acceptability. Results: Forty-nine community members participated; most (78.7%) attended five or more research training sessions. Session quality and usefulness was high. Community members reported significant increases in their confidence for participating in all phases of research (e.g., formulating research questions, selecting research methods, writing manuscripts). All CHIRP groups successfully conducted CBPR pilot studies. Conclusions: The CHIRP process builds on existing infrastructure in academic and community settings to foster CEnR. Brief research training and pilot studies around community-identified health needs can enhance individual and organizational capacity to address health disparities in rural and underserved communities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)300-306
Number of pages7
JournalClinical and Translational Science
Volume7
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Rural Health
Translational Medical Research
Rural Population
Health
Research
Community-Based Participatory Research
Manuscripts
Pediatric Obesity

Keywords

  • Community-engaged research
  • Obesity
  • Practice-based research networks
  • Public health
  • Translational research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics(all)

Cite this

Engaging the underserved : A process model to mobilize rural community health coalitions as partners in translational research. / Davis, Melinda; Aromaa, Susan; McGinnis, Paul B.; Ramsey, Katrina; Rollins, Nancy; Smith, Jamie; Beamer, Beth Ann; Buckley, David; Stange, Kurt C.; Fagnan, Lyle.

In: Clinical and Translational Science, Vol. 7, No. 4, 2014, p. 300-306.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Davis, Melinda ; Aromaa, Susan ; McGinnis, Paul B. ; Ramsey, Katrina ; Rollins, Nancy ; Smith, Jamie ; Beamer, Beth Ann ; Buckley, David ; Stange, Kurt C. ; Fagnan, Lyle. / Engaging the underserved : A process model to mobilize rural community health coalitions as partners in translational research. In: Clinical and Translational Science. 2014 ; Vol. 7, No. 4. pp. 300-306.
@article{d200ddf5416544ae84d9975f3c9f19f4,
title = "Engaging the underserved: A process model to mobilize rural community health coalitions as partners in translational research",
abstract = "Purpose: Community engagement (CE) and community-engaged research (CEnR) are increasingly recognized as critical elements in research translation. Process models to develop CEnR partnerships in rural and underserved communities are needed. Method: Academic partners transformed four established Community Health Improvement Partnerships (CHIPs) into Community Health Improvement and Research Partnerships (CHIRPs). The intervention consisted of three elements: an academic-community kickoff/orientation meeting, delivery of eight research training modules to CHIRP members, and local community-based participatory research (CBPR) pilot studies addressing childhood obesity. We conducted a mixed methods analysis of pre-/postsurveys, interviews, session evaluations, observational field notes, and attendance logs to evaluate intervention effectiveness and acceptability. Results: Forty-nine community members participated; most (78.7{\%}) attended five or more research training sessions. Session quality and usefulness was high. Community members reported significant increases in their confidence for participating in all phases of research (e.g., formulating research questions, selecting research methods, writing manuscripts). All CHIRP groups successfully conducted CBPR pilot studies. Conclusions: The CHIRP process builds on existing infrastructure in academic and community settings to foster CEnR. Brief research training and pilot studies around community-identified health needs can enhance individual and organizational capacity to address health disparities in rural and underserved communities.",
keywords = "Community-engaged research, Obesity, Practice-based research networks, Public health, Translational research",
author = "Melinda Davis and Susan Aromaa and McGinnis, {Paul B.} and Katrina Ramsey and Nancy Rollins and Jamie Smith and Beamer, {Beth Ann} and David Buckley and Stange, {Kurt C.} and Lyle Fagnan",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1111/cts.12168",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "300--306",
journal = "Clinical and Translational Science",
issn = "1752-8054",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Engaging the underserved

T2 - A process model to mobilize rural community health coalitions as partners in translational research

AU - Davis, Melinda

AU - Aromaa, Susan

AU - McGinnis, Paul B.

AU - Ramsey, Katrina

AU - Rollins, Nancy

AU - Smith, Jamie

AU - Beamer, Beth Ann

AU - Buckley, David

AU - Stange, Kurt C.

AU - Fagnan, Lyle

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Purpose: Community engagement (CE) and community-engaged research (CEnR) are increasingly recognized as critical elements in research translation. Process models to develop CEnR partnerships in rural and underserved communities are needed. Method: Academic partners transformed four established Community Health Improvement Partnerships (CHIPs) into Community Health Improvement and Research Partnerships (CHIRPs). The intervention consisted of three elements: an academic-community kickoff/orientation meeting, delivery of eight research training modules to CHIRP members, and local community-based participatory research (CBPR) pilot studies addressing childhood obesity. We conducted a mixed methods analysis of pre-/postsurveys, interviews, session evaluations, observational field notes, and attendance logs to evaluate intervention effectiveness and acceptability. Results: Forty-nine community members participated; most (78.7%) attended five or more research training sessions. Session quality and usefulness was high. Community members reported significant increases in their confidence for participating in all phases of research (e.g., formulating research questions, selecting research methods, writing manuscripts). All CHIRP groups successfully conducted CBPR pilot studies. Conclusions: The CHIRP process builds on existing infrastructure in academic and community settings to foster CEnR. Brief research training and pilot studies around community-identified health needs can enhance individual and organizational capacity to address health disparities in rural and underserved communities.

AB - Purpose: Community engagement (CE) and community-engaged research (CEnR) are increasingly recognized as critical elements in research translation. Process models to develop CEnR partnerships in rural and underserved communities are needed. Method: Academic partners transformed four established Community Health Improvement Partnerships (CHIPs) into Community Health Improvement and Research Partnerships (CHIRPs). The intervention consisted of three elements: an academic-community kickoff/orientation meeting, delivery of eight research training modules to CHIRP members, and local community-based participatory research (CBPR) pilot studies addressing childhood obesity. We conducted a mixed methods analysis of pre-/postsurveys, interviews, session evaluations, observational field notes, and attendance logs to evaluate intervention effectiveness and acceptability. Results: Forty-nine community members participated; most (78.7%) attended five or more research training sessions. Session quality and usefulness was high. Community members reported significant increases in their confidence for participating in all phases of research (e.g., formulating research questions, selecting research methods, writing manuscripts). All CHIRP groups successfully conducted CBPR pilot studies. Conclusions: The CHIRP process builds on existing infrastructure in academic and community settings to foster CEnR. Brief research training and pilot studies around community-identified health needs can enhance individual and organizational capacity to address health disparities in rural and underserved communities.

KW - Community-engaged research

KW - Obesity

KW - Practice-based research networks

KW - Public health

KW - Translational research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84906239373&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84906239373&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/cts.12168

DO - 10.1111/cts.12168

M3 - Article

C2 - 24837826

AN - SCOPUS:84906239373

VL - 7

SP - 300

EP - 306

JO - Clinical and Translational Science

JF - Clinical and Translational Science

SN - 1752-8054

IS - 4

ER -