Engagement

An indicator of difference in the perceptions of antenatal care for pregnant women from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds

Angela Docherty, Carol Bugge, Andrew Watterson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Socioeconomically deprived women are at greater risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Research tends to focus on access of services. Yet access may not equate with the equity of services for women from different socioeconomic backgrounds. Objectives To determine whether pregnant women's perceptions of antenatal provision differed in relation to their socioeconomic deprivation ranking (determined by the Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation 2006). Design A longitudinal, qualitative study with comparative antenatal case studies between January 2007 and April 2009. Setting/Participants Cases were primigravida women from 'least deprived' (n=9) and 'most deprived' (n=12) geographical areas within one local authority in Scotland. Analysis Data were analysed using case study replication analysis. Results There was little difference in access to antenatal services between the 'least' and 'most' deprived groups. Perception of care differed in relation to the level of 'engagement' (defined using constructs of: language and personalization of care; power and relationships; and health literacy). Engagement was evidenced in most of the 'least deprived' cases and almost none of the 'most deprived' cases. Specifically, socioeconomically deprived women described less evidence of personal connection to their own care, effective communication and the opportunity for shared decision making. Conclusion In women from socioeconomically deprived areas, access may be a less useful indicator than engagement when assessing antenatal service quality. As engagement levels may be one method by which to predict and improve health outcomes, a more equitable antenatal service may need to be developed through the early identification of those women at risk of non-engagement.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)126-138
Number of pages13
JournalHealth Expectations
Volume15
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Prenatal Care
Pregnant Women
Health Literacy
Scotland
Pregnancy Outcome
Longitudinal Studies
Decision Making
Language
Communication
Health
Research

Keywords

  • Antenatal care
  • Case study
  • Engagement
  • Health inequalities
  • Health literacy
  • Socioeconomic deprivation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Engagement : An indicator of difference in the perceptions of antenatal care for pregnant women from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds. / Docherty, Angela; Bugge, Carol; Watterson, Andrew.

In: Health Expectations, Vol. 15, No. 2, 06.2012, p. 126-138.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c39bbb3bca324561a5e19d24a18be367,
title = "Engagement: An indicator of difference in the perceptions of antenatal care for pregnant women from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds",
abstract = "Background Socioeconomically deprived women are at greater risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Research tends to focus on access of services. Yet access may not equate with the equity of services for women from different socioeconomic backgrounds. Objectives To determine whether pregnant women's perceptions of antenatal provision differed in relation to their socioeconomic deprivation ranking (determined by the Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation 2006). Design A longitudinal, qualitative study with comparative antenatal case studies between January 2007 and April 2009. Setting/Participants Cases were primigravida women from 'least deprived' (n=9) and 'most deprived' (n=12) geographical areas within one local authority in Scotland. Analysis Data were analysed using case study replication analysis. Results There was little difference in access to antenatal services between the 'least' and 'most' deprived groups. Perception of care differed in relation to the level of 'engagement' (defined using constructs of: language and personalization of care; power and relationships; and health literacy). Engagement was evidenced in most of the 'least deprived' cases and almost none of the 'most deprived' cases. Specifically, socioeconomically deprived women described less evidence of personal connection to their own care, effective communication and the opportunity for shared decision making. Conclusion In women from socioeconomically deprived areas, access may be a less useful indicator than engagement when assessing antenatal service quality. As engagement levels may be one method by which to predict and improve health outcomes, a more equitable antenatal service may need to be developed through the early identification of those women at risk of non-engagement.",
keywords = "Antenatal care, Case study, Engagement, Health inequalities, Health literacy, Socioeconomic deprivation",
author = "Angela Docherty and Carol Bugge and Andrew Watterson",
year = "2012",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00684.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "126--138",
journal = "Health Expectations",
issn = "1369-6513",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Engagement

T2 - An indicator of difference in the perceptions of antenatal care for pregnant women from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds

AU - Docherty, Angela

AU - Bugge, Carol

AU - Watterson, Andrew

PY - 2012/6

Y1 - 2012/6

N2 - Background Socioeconomically deprived women are at greater risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Research tends to focus on access of services. Yet access may not equate with the equity of services for women from different socioeconomic backgrounds. Objectives To determine whether pregnant women's perceptions of antenatal provision differed in relation to their socioeconomic deprivation ranking (determined by the Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation 2006). Design A longitudinal, qualitative study with comparative antenatal case studies between January 2007 and April 2009. Setting/Participants Cases were primigravida women from 'least deprived' (n=9) and 'most deprived' (n=12) geographical areas within one local authority in Scotland. Analysis Data were analysed using case study replication analysis. Results There was little difference in access to antenatal services between the 'least' and 'most' deprived groups. Perception of care differed in relation to the level of 'engagement' (defined using constructs of: language and personalization of care; power and relationships; and health literacy). Engagement was evidenced in most of the 'least deprived' cases and almost none of the 'most deprived' cases. Specifically, socioeconomically deprived women described less evidence of personal connection to their own care, effective communication and the opportunity for shared decision making. Conclusion In women from socioeconomically deprived areas, access may be a less useful indicator than engagement when assessing antenatal service quality. As engagement levels may be one method by which to predict and improve health outcomes, a more equitable antenatal service may need to be developed through the early identification of those women at risk of non-engagement.

AB - Background Socioeconomically deprived women are at greater risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Research tends to focus on access of services. Yet access may not equate with the equity of services for women from different socioeconomic backgrounds. Objectives To determine whether pregnant women's perceptions of antenatal provision differed in relation to their socioeconomic deprivation ranking (determined by the Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation 2006). Design A longitudinal, qualitative study with comparative antenatal case studies between January 2007 and April 2009. Setting/Participants Cases were primigravida women from 'least deprived' (n=9) and 'most deprived' (n=12) geographical areas within one local authority in Scotland. Analysis Data were analysed using case study replication analysis. Results There was little difference in access to antenatal services between the 'least' and 'most' deprived groups. Perception of care differed in relation to the level of 'engagement' (defined using constructs of: language and personalization of care; power and relationships; and health literacy). Engagement was evidenced in most of the 'least deprived' cases and almost none of the 'most deprived' cases. Specifically, socioeconomically deprived women described less evidence of personal connection to their own care, effective communication and the opportunity for shared decision making. Conclusion In women from socioeconomically deprived areas, access may be a less useful indicator than engagement when assessing antenatal service quality. As engagement levels may be one method by which to predict and improve health outcomes, a more equitable antenatal service may need to be developed through the early identification of those women at risk of non-engagement.

KW - Antenatal care

KW - Case study

KW - Engagement

KW - Health inequalities

KW - Health literacy

KW - Socioeconomic deprivation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861443107&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84861443107&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00684.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00684.x

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 126

EP - 138

JO - Health Expectations

JF - Health Expectations

SN - 1369-6513

IS - 2

ER -