End-of-life in adults with congenital heart disease: A call for early communication

Daniel Tobler, Matthias Greutmann, Jack M. Colman, Mehtap Greutmann-Yantiri, Lawrence S. Librach, Adrienne Kovacs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: We investigated preferences of adults with congenital heart disease (CHD) and their health care providers regarding end-of-life (EOL) communication. Methods: Adult CHD outpatients and health care providers completed surveys about preferences for and experiences with EOL communication. Responses were compared between patients and providers. Results: Two hundred patients (18-79 years) and 48 CHD health care providers (primarily cardiologists) completed surveys. Only 2 patients (1%) indicated that they had discussed EOL planning with their medical team. In contrast, 50% of providers reported that they typically discuss issues including life expectancy, advance planning, and resuscitation preferences with their outpatients. Seventy-eight percent (156/199) of patients wanted their medical team to raise EOL issues; this preference was independent of disease complexity and socio-demographic factors. In contrast, providers reported that their EOL discussions increase in accordance with disease complexity (p < 0.001). Early initiation of EOL discussions, before diagnosis with life-threatening complications, was favored by 62% of patients but only 38% of providers (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Health professionals caring for adults with CHD should explore preferences of their patients for EOL discussions earlier in the disease course, and not only with patients facing life-threatening complications and/or with complex conditions. When EOL discussions do occur, health care providers should attempt to ensure that patients better understand these conversations. Increased attention to EOL issues is proposed in order to improve the care of patients with CHD across the lifespan.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)383-387
Number of pages5
JournalInternational Journal of Cardiology
Volume155
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 22 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Heart Diseases
Communication
Health Personnel
Patient Preference
Ambulatory Care
Life Expectancy
Resuscitation
Patient Care
Outpatients
Demography
Health

Keywords

  • Communication
  • Congenital heart defects
  • End-of-life
  • Heart failure

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cite this

End-of-life in adults with congenital heart disease : A call for early communication. / Tobler, Daniel; Greutmann, Matthias; Colman, Jack M.; Greutmann-Yantiri, Mehtap; Librach, Lawrence S.; Kovacs, Adrienne.

In: International Journal of Cardiology, Vol. 155, No. 3, 22.03.2012, p. 383-387.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tobler, Daniel ; Greutmann, Matthias ; Colman, Jack M. ; Greutmann-Yantiri, Mehtap ; Librach, Lawrence S. ; Kovacs, Adrienne. / End-of-life in adults with congenital heart disease : A call for early communication. In: International Journal of Cardiology. 2012 ; Vol. 155, No. 3. pp. 383-387.
@article{df592a3809d84aeabf07b76e798c993c,
title = "End-of-life in adults with congenital heart disease: A call for early communication",
abstract = "Background: We investigated preferences of adults with congenital heart disease (CHD) and their health care providers regarding end-of-life (EOL) communication. Methods: Adult CHD outpatients and health care providers completed surveys about preferences for and experiences with EOL communication. Responses were compared between patients and providers. Results: Two hundred patients (18-79 years) and 48 CHD health care providers (primarily cardiologists) completed surveys. Only 2 patients (1{\%}) indicated that they had discussed EOL planning with their medical team. In contrast, 50{\%} of providers reported that they typically discuss issues including life expectancy, advance planning, and resuscitation preferences with their outpatients. Seventy-eight percent (156/199) of patients wanted their medical team to raise EOL issues; this preference was independent of disease complexity and socio-demographic factors. In contrast, providers reported that their EOL discussions increase in accordance with disease complexity (p < 0.001). Early initiation of EOL discussions, before diagnosis with life-threatening complications, was favored by 62{\%} of patients but only 38{\%} of providers (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Health professionals caring for adults with CHD should explore preferences of their patients for EOL discussions earlier in the disease course, and not only with patients facing life-threatening complications and/or with complex conditions. When EOL discussions do occur, health care providers should attempt to ensure that patients better understand these conversations. Increased attention to EOL issues is proposed in order to improve the care of patients with CHD across the lifespan.",
keywords = "Communication, Congenital heart defects, End-of-life, Heart failure",
author = "Daniel Tobler and Matthias Greutmann and Colman, {Jack M.} and Mehtap Greutmann-Yantiri and Librach, {Lawrence S.} and Adrienne Kovacs",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
day = "22",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.10.050",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "155",
pages = "383--387",
journal = "International Journal of Cardiology",
issn = "0167-5273",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - End-of-life in adults with congenital heart disease

T2 - A call for early communication

AU - Tobler, Daniel

AU - Greutmann, Matthias

AU - Colman, Jack M.

AU - Greutmann-Yantiri, Mehtap

AU - Librach, Lawrence S.

AU - Kovacs, Adrienne

PY - 2012/3/22

Y1 - 2012/3/22

N2 - Background: We investigated preferences of adults with congenital heart disease (CHD) and their health care providers regarding end-of-life (EOL) communication. Methods: Adult CHD outpatients and health care providers completed surveys about preferences for and experiences with EOL communication. Responses were compared between patients and providers. Results: Two hundred patients (18-79 years) and 48 CHD health care providers (primarily cardiologists) completed surveys. Only 2 patients (1%) indicated that they had discussed EOL planning with their medical team. In contrast, 50% of providers reported that they typically discuss issues including life expectancy, advance planning, and resuscitation preferences with their outpatients. Seventy-eight percent (156/199) of patients wanted their medical team to raise EOL issues; this preference was independent of disease complexity and socio-demographic factors. In contrast, providers reported that their EOL discussions increase in accordance with disease complexity (p < 0.001). Early initiation of EOL discussions, before diagnosis with life-threatening complications, was favored by 62% of patients but only 38% of providers (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Health professionals caring for adults with CHD should explore preferences of their patients for EOL discussions earlier in the disease course, and not only with patients facing life-threatening complications and/or with complex conditions. When EOL discussions do occur, health care providers should attempt to ensure that patients better understand these conversations. Increased attention to EOL issues is proposed in order to improve the care of patients with CHD across the lifespan.

AB - Background: We investigated preferences of adults with congenital heart disease (CHD) and their health care providers regarding end-of-life (EOL) communication. Methods: Adult CHD outpatients and health care providers completed surveys about preferences for and experiences with EOL communication. Responses were compared between patients and providers. Results: Two hundred patients (18-79 years) and 48 CHD health care providers (primarily cardiologists) completed surveys. Only 2 patients (1%) indicated that they had discussed EOL planning with their medical team. In contrast, 50% of providers reported that they typically discuss issues including life expectancy, advance planning, and resuscitation preferences with their outpatients. Seventy-eight percent (156/199) of patients wanted their medical team to raise EOL issues; this preference was independent of disease complexity and socio-demographic factors. In contrast, providers reported that their EOL discussions increase in accordance with disease complexity (p < 0.001). Early initiation of EOL discussions, before diagnosis with life-threatening complications, was favored by 62% of patients but only 38% of providers (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Health professionals caring for adults with CHD should explore preferences of their patients for EOL discussions earlier in the disease course, and not only with patients facing life-threatening complications and/or with complex conditions. When EOL discussions do occur, health care providers should attempt to ensure that patients better understand these conversations. Increased attention to EOL issues is proposed in order to improve the care of patients with CHD across the lifespan.

KW - Communication

KW - Congenital heart defects

KW - End-of-life

KW - Heart failure

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84857791673&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84857791673&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.10.050

DO - 10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.10.050

M3 - Article

C2 - 21094550

AN - SCOPUS:84857791673

VL - 155

SP - 383

EP - 387

JO - International Journal of Cardiology

JF - International Journal of Cardiology

SN - 0167-5273

IS - 3

ER -