EMTALA, two decades later

A descriptive review of fiscal year 2000 violations

Dustin W. Ballard, Robert W. Derlet, Ben A. Rich, Robert (Bob) Lowe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To determine to what extent cases sanctioned under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA) reflect willful refusal of screening or stabilization. Basic Procedures: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services were petitioned for all confirmed EMTALA citations from year 2000. Each citation was classified into one of three categories: (1) willful refusal to perform a screening exam or to stabilize; (2) possible refusal to screen or stabilize; or (3) no evidence of refusal to screen or stabilize. Citations were reviewed to determine the presence of 10 other characteristics. Three investigators independently reviewed a subset of data to verify acceptable inter-rater reliability. Findings: We received 157 (53%) of the 294 records requested. Of the 131 involving ED personnel, 44 (34%) demonstrated willful refusal of screening or stabilization. Thirty-two (24%) were possible refusals of service, and 55 (42%) contained no evidence of refusal. Principal Conclusion: Emergency department willful refusal of screening and stabilization still occurs despite enforcement of EMTALA.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)197-205
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Journal of Emergency Medicine
Volume24
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2006

Fingerprint

Emergency Treatment
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (U.S.)
Hospital Emergency Service
Research Personnel

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

EMTALA, two decades later : A descriptive review of fiscal year 2000 violations. / Ballard, Dustin W.; Derlet, Robert W.; Rich, Ben A.; Lowe, Robert (Bob).

In: American Journal of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 24, No. 2, 03.2006, p. 197-205.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ballard, Dustin W. ; Derlet, Robert W. ; Rich, Ben A. ; Lowe, Robert (Bob). / EMTALA, two decades later : A descriptive review of fiscal year 2000 violations. In: American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2006 ; Vol. 24, No. 2. pp. 197-205.
@article{862850439c0144669e2d8a4b7cdbebcb,
title = "EMTALA, two decades later: A descriptive review of fiscal year 2000 violations",
abstract = "Purpose: To determine to what extent cases sanctioned under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA) reflect willful refusal of screening or stabilization. Basic Procedures: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services were petitioned for all confirmed EMTALA citations from year 2000. Each citation was classified into one of three categories: (1) willful refusal to perform a screening exam or to stabilize; (2) possible refusal to screen or stabilize; or (3) no evidence of refusal to screen or stabilize. Citations were reviewed to determine the presence of 10 other characteristics. Three investigators independently reviewed a subset of data to verify acceptable inter-rater reliability. Findings: We received 157 (53{\%}) of the 294 records requested. Of the 131 involving ED personnel, 44 (34{\%}) demonstrated willful refusal of screening or stabilization. Thirty-two (24{\%}) were possible refusals of service, and 55 (42{\%}) contained no evidence of refusal. Principal Conclusion: Emergency department willful refusal of screening and stabilization still occurs despite enforcement of EMTALA.",
author = "Ballard, {Dustin W.} and Derlet, {Robert W.} and Rich, {Ben A.} and Lowe, {Robert (Bob)}",
year = "2006",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajem.2005.09.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "197--205",
journal = "American Journal of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "0735-6757",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - EMTALA, two decades later

T2 - A descriptive review of fiscal year 2000 violations

AU - Ballard, Dustin W.

AU - Derlet, Robert W.

AU - Rich, Ben A.

AU - Lowe, Robert (Bob)

PY - 2006/3

Y1 - 2006/3

N2 - Purpose: To determine to what extent cases sanctioned under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA) reflect willful refusal of screening or stabilization. Basic Procedures: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services were petitioned for all confirmed EMTALA citations from year 2000. Each citation was classified into one of three categories: (1) willful refusal to perform a screening exam or to stabilize; (2) possible refusal to screen or stabilize; or (3) no evidence of refusal to screen or stabilize. Citations were reviewed to determine the presence of 10 other characteristics. Three investigators independently reviewed a subset of data to verify acceptable inter-rater reliability. Findings: We received 157 (53%) of the 294 records requested. Of the 131 involving ED personnel, 44 (34%) demonstrated willful refusal of screening or stabilization. Thirty-two (24%) were possible refusals of service, and 55 (42%) contained no evidence of refusal. Principal Conclusion: Emergency department willful refusal of screening and stabilization still occurs despite enforcement of EMTALA.

AB - Purpose: To determine to what extent cases sanctioned under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA) reflect willful refusal of screening or stabilization. Basic Procedures: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services were petitioned for all confirmed EMTALA citations from year 2000. Each citation was classified into one of three categories: (1) willful refusal to perform a screening exam or to stabilize; (2) possible refusal to screen or stabilize; or (3) no evidence of refusal to screen or stabilize. Citations were reviewed to determine the presence of 10 other characteristics. Three investigators independently reviewed a subset of data to verify acceptable inter-rater reliability. Findings: We received 157 (53%) of the 294 records requested. Of the 131 involving ED personnel, 44 (34%) demonstrated willful refusal of screening or stabilization. Thirty-two (24%) were possible refusals of service, and 55 (42%) contained no evidence of refusal. Principal Conclusion: Emergency department willful refusal of screening and stabilization still occurs despite enforcement of EMTALA.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33144475573&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33144475573&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajem.2005.09.003

DO - 10.1016/j.ajem.2005.09.003

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 197

EP - 205

JO - American Journal of Emergency Medicine

JF - American Journal of Emergency Medicine

SN - 0735-6757

IS - 2

ER -