Emergency physicians' perceptions and decision-making processes regarding patients presenting with palpitations

Marc A. Probst, Hemal K. Kanzaria, Jerome R. Hoffman, William R. Mower, Roya S. Moheimani, Benjamin Sun, Denise D. Quigley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Palpitations are a common emergency department (ED) complaint, yet relatively little research exists on this topic from an emergency care perspective. Objectives We sought to describe the perceptions and clinical decision-making processes of emergency physicians (EP) surrounding patients with palpitations. Methods We conducted 21 semistructured interviews with a convenience sample of EPs. We recruited participants from academic and community practice settings from four regions of the United States. The transcribed interviews were analyzed using a combination of structural coding and grounded theory approaches with ATLAS.ti, a qualitative data analysis software program (version 7; Atlas.ti Scientific Software Development GmbH, Berlin, Germany). Results EPs perceive palpitations to be a common but generally benign chief complaint. EPs' clinical approach to palpitations, with regards to testing, treatment, and ED management, can be classified as relating to one or more of the following themes: 1) risk stratification, 2) diagnostic categorization, 3) algorithmic management, and 4) case-specific gestalt. With regard to disposition decisions, four main themes emerged: 1) presence of a serious diagnosis, 2) perceived need for further cardiac testing/monitoring, 3) presence of key associated symptoms, 4) request of other physician or patient desire. The interrater reliability exercise yielded a Fleiss' kappa measure of 0.69, indicating substantial agreement between coders. Conclusion EPs perceive palpitations to be a common but generally benign chief complaint. EPs rely on one or more of four main clinical approaches to manage these patients. These findings could help guide future efforts at developing risk-stratification tools and clinical algorithms for patients with palpitations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)236-243
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Emergency Medicine
Volume49
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2015

Fingerprint

Decision Making
Emergencies
Physicians
Hospital Emergency Service
Software
Interviews
Atlases
Case Management
Emergency Medical Services
Berlin
Germany
Exercise
Research
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • clinical decision-making
  • emergency medicine
  • interviews
  • palpitations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Emergency physicians' perceptions and decision-making processes regarding patients presenting with palpitations. / Probst, Marc A.; Kanzaria, Hemal K.; Hoffman, Jerome R.; Mower, William R.; Moheimani, Roya S.; Sun, Benjamin; Quigley, Denise D.

In: Journal of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 49, No. 2, 01.08.2015, p. 236-243.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Probst, Marc A. ; Kanzaria, Hemal K. ; Hoffman, Jerome R. ; Mower, William R. ; Moheimani, Roya S. ; Sun, Benjamin ; Quigley, Denise D. / Emergency physicians' perceptions and decision-making processes regarding patients presenting with palpitations. In: Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2015 ; Vol. 49, No. 2. pp. 236-243.
@article{f78221dcbe4941ca9703656eacc69a98,
title = "Emergency physicians' perceptions and decision-making processes regarding patients presenting with palpitations",
abstract = "Background Palpitations are a common emergency department (ED) complaint, yet relatively little research exists on this topic from an emergency care perspective. Objectives We sought to describe the perceptions and clinical decision-making processes of emergency physicians (EP) surrounding patients with palpitations. Methods We conducted 21 semistructured interviews with a convenience sample of EPs. We recruited participants from academic and community practice settings from four regions of the United States. The transcribed interviews were analyzed using a combination of structural coding and grounded theory approaches with ATLAS.ti, a qualitative data analysis software program (version 7; Atlas.ti Scientific Software Development GmbH, Berlin, Germany). Results EPs perceive palpitations to be a common but generally benign chief complaint. EPs' clinical approach to palpitations, with regards to testing, treatment, and ED management, can be classified as relating to one or more of the following themes: 1) risk stratification, 2) diagnostic categorization, 3) algorithmic management, and 4) case-specific gestalt. With regard to disposition decisions, four main themes emerged: 1) presence of a serious diagnosis, 2) perceived need for further cardiac testing/monitoring, 3) presence of key associated symptoms, 4) request of other physician or patient desire. The interrater reliability exercise yielded a Fleiss' kappa measure of 0.69, indicating substantial agreement between coders. Conclusion EPs perceive palpitations to be a common but generally benign chief complaint. EPs rely on one or more of four main clinical approaches to manage these patients. These findings could help guide future efforts at developing risk-stratification tools and clinical algorithms for patients with palpitations.",
keywords = "clinical decision-making, emergency medicine, interviews, palpitations",
author = "Probst, {Marc A.} and Kanzaria, {Hemal K.} and Hoffman, {Jerome R.} and Mower, {William R.} and Moheimani, {Roya S.} and Benjamin Sun and Quigley, {Denise D.}",
year = "2015",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jemermed.2015.02.013",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "49",
pages = "236--243",
journal = "Journal of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "0736-4679",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Emergency physicians' perceptions and decision-making processes regarding patients presenting with palpitations

AU - Probst, Marc A.

AU - Kanzaria, Hemal K.

AU - Hoffman, Jerome R.

AU - Mower, William R.

AU - Moheimani, Roya S.

AU - Sun, Benjamin

AU - Quigley, Denise D.

PY - 2015/8/1

Y1 - 2015/8/1

N2 - Background Palpitations are a common emergency department (ED) complaint, yet relatively little research exists on this topic from an emergency care perspective. Objectives We sought to describe the perceptions and clinical decision-making processes of emergency physicians (EP) surrounding patients with palpitations. Methods We conducted 21 semistructured interviews with a convenience sample of EPs. We recruited participants from academic and community practice settings from four regions of the United States. The transcribed interviews were analyzed using a combination of structural coding and grounded theory approaches with ATLAS.ti, a qualitative data analysis software program (version 7; Atlas.ti Scientific Software Development GmbH, Berlin, Germany). Results EPs perceive palpitations to be a common but generally benign chief complaint. EPs' clinical approach to palpitations, with regards to testing, treatment, and ED management, can be classified as relating to one or more of the following themes: 1) risk stratification, 2) diagnostic categorization, 3) algorithmic management, and 4) case-specific gestalt. With regard to disposition decisions, four main themes emerged: 1) presence of a serious diagnosis, 2) perceived need for further cardiac testing/monitoring, 3) presence of key associated symptoms, 4) request of other physician or patient desire. The interrater reliability exercise yielded a Fleiss' kappa measure of 0.69, indicating substantial agreement between coders. Conclusion EPs perceive palpitations to be a common but generally benign chief complaint. EPs rely on one or more of four main clinical approaches to manage these patients. These findings could help guide future efforts at developing risk-stratification tools and clinical algorithms for patients with palpitations.

AB - Background Palpitations are a common emergency department (ED) complaint, yet relatively little research exists on this topic from an emergency care perspective. Objectives We sought to describe the perceptions and clinical decision-making processes of emergency physicians (EP) surrounding patients with palpitations. Methods We conducted 21 semistructured interviews with a convenience sample of EPs. We recruited participants from academic and community practice settings from four regions of the United States. The transcribed interviews were analyzed using a combination of structural coding and grounded theory approaches with ATLAS.ti, a qualitative data analysis software program (version 7; Atlas.ti Scientific Software Development GmbH, Berlin, Germany). Results EPs perceive palpitations to be a common but generally benign chief complaint. EPs' clinical approach to palpitations, with regards to testing, treatment, and ED management, can be classified as relating to one or more of the following themes: 1) risk stratification, 2) diagnostic categorization, 3) algorithmic management, and 4) case-specific gestalt. With regard to disposition decisions, four main themes emerged: 1) presence of a serious diagnosis, 2) perceived need for further cardiac testing/monitoring, 3) presence of key associated symptoms, 4) request of other physician or patient desire. The interrater reliability exercise yielded a Fleiss' kappa measure of 0.69, indicating substantial agreement between coders. Conclusion EPs perceive palpitations to be a common but generally benign chief complaint. EPs rely on one or more of four main clinical approaches to manage these patients. These findings could help guide future efforts at developing risk-stratification tools and clinical algorithms for patients with palpitations.

KW - clinical decision-making

KW - emergency medicine

KW - interviews

KW - palpitations

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938204266&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84938204266&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jemermed.2015.02.013

DO - 10.1016/j.jemermed.2015.02.013

M3 - Article

VL - 49

SP - 236

EP - 243

JO - Journal of Emergency Medicine

JF - Journal of Emergency Medicine

SN - 0736-4679

IS - 2

ER -