Emergency neurosurgical care solutions: Acute care surgery, regionalization, and the neurosurgeon: Results of the 2008 CNS consensus session

Richard W. Byrne, Bradley T. Bagan, William Bingaman, Valerie Anderson, Nathan Selden

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Organized general surgery has recently proposed creation of a new acute care surgery subspecialty to include emergency care of basic neurosurgical and orthopedic surgical problems. Little is known about neurosurgical attitudes toward this proposal and alternative methods of improving access to emergency neurosurgical care. METHODS: During a consensus session at the 2008 Annual Meeting of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons (CNS), electronic data were collected regarding neurosurgeons?' attitudes toward acute care surgery, emergency neurosurgical care regionalization, and other regulatory options. RESULTS: Ninety-nine attendees participated in polling, broadly representing private (45%) and academic (34%) practices from all regions of the United States. Eighty-nine percent reported taking emergency calls (75% at least twice per week), with the majority (57%) not receiving a stipend. Only 9% responded that routine emergency cases are frequently transferred from their hospital. The majority (60%) either agreed or strongly agreed that there are problems with neurosurgery emergency coverage in their region. Before the session, 89% were opposed to the acute care surgery initiative as a solution for neurosurgery emergency coverage and 85% favored regionalization of emergency care. Opinions did not change significantly following expert presentations and discussion. CONCLUSION: Neurosurgeons polled during a 2008 CNS consensus session opposed creation of an acute care surgery specialty within general surgery that covers neurosurgical emergencies, but they favored neurosurgical emergency care regionalization. The CNS consensus sessions provide a forum for discussing socioeconomic and professional issues important to neurological surgery and for formulating preliminary information and strategies of use to regulatory stakeholders in addressing these issues.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1063-1068
Number of pages6
JournalNeurosurgery
Volume68
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2011

Fingerprint

Emergency Medical Services
Consensus
Emergencies
Neurosurgery
Neurosurgeons
Orthopedics

Keywords

  • Acute care
  • Congress of Neurological Surgeons
  • Neurosurgeon
  • Neurosurgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Surgery

Cite this

Emergency neurosurgical care solutions : Acute care surgery, regionalization, and the neurosurgeon: Results of the 2008 CNS consensus session. / Byrne, Richard W.; Bagan, Bradley T.; Bingaman, William; Anderson, Valerie; Selden, Nathan.

In: Neurosurgery, Vol. 68, No. 4, 04.2011, p. 1063-1068.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Byrne, Richard W. ; Bagan, Bradley T. ; Bingaman, William ; Anderson, Valerie ; Selden, Nathan. / Emergency neurosurgical care solutions : Acute care surgery, regionalization, and the neurosurgeon: Results of the 2008 CNS consensus session. In: Neurosurgery. 2011 ; Vol. 68, No. 4. pp. 1063-1068.
@article{df6d397862ee44048937a1564e51f7e0,
title = "Emergency neurosurgical care solutions: Acute care surgery, regionalization, and the neurosurgeon: Results of the 2008 CNS consensus session",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: Organized general surgery has recently proposed creation of a new acute care surgery subspecialty to include emergency care of basic neurosurgical and orthopedic surgical problems. Little is known about neurosurgical attitudes toward this proposal and alternative methods of improving access to emergency neurosurgical care. METHODS: During a consensus session at the 2008 Annual Meeting of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons (CNS), electronic data were collected regarding neurosurgeons?' attitudes toward acute care surgery, emergency neurosurgical care regionalization, and other regulatory options. RESULTS: Ninety-nine attendees participated in polling, broadly representing private (45{\%}) and academic (34{\%}) practices from all regions of the United States. Eighty-nine percent reported taking emergency calls (75{\%} at least twice per week), with the majority (57{\%}) not receiving a stipend. Only 9{\%} responded that routine emergency cases are frequently transferred from their hospital. The majority (60{\%}) either agreed or strongly agreed that there are problems with neurosurgery emergency coverage in their region. Before the session, 89{\%} were opposed to the acute care surgery initiative as a solution for neurosurgery emergency coverage and 85{\%} favored regionalization of emergency care. Opinions did not change significantly following expert presentations and discussion. CONCLUSION: Neurosurgeons polled during a 2008 CNS consensus session opposed creation of an acute care surgery specialty within general surgery that covers neurosurgical emergencies, but they favored neurosurgical emergency care regionalization. The CNS consensus sessions provide a forum for discussing socioeconomic and professional issues important to neurological surgery and for formulating preliminary information and strategies of use to regulatory stakeholders in addressing these issues.",
keywords = "Acute care, Congress of Neurological Surgeons, Neurosurgeon, Neurosurgery",
author = "Byrne, {Richard W.} and Bagan, {Bradley T.} and William Bingaman and Valerie Anderson and Nathan Selden",
year = "2011",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1227/NEU.0b013e318209cde0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "68",
pages = "1063--1068",
journal = "Neurosurgery",
issn = "0148-396X",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Emergency neurosurgical care solutions

T2 - Acute care surgery, regionalization, and the neurosurgeon: Results of the 2008 CNS consensus session

AU - Byrne, Richard W.

AU - Bagan, Bradley T.

AU - Bingaman, William

AU - Anderson, Valerie

AU - Selden, Nathan

PY - 2011/4

Y1 - 2011/4

N2 - OBJECTIVE: Organized general surgery has recently proposed creation of a new acute care surgery subspecialty to include emergency care of basic neurosurgical and orthopedic surgical problems. Little is known about neurosurgical attitudes toward this proposal and alternative methods of improving access to emergency neurosurgical care. METHODS: During a consensus session at the 2008 Annual Meeting of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons (CNS), electronic data were collected regarding neurosurgeons?' attitudes toward acute care surgery, emergency neurosurgical care regionalization, and other regulatory options. RESULTS: Ninety-nine attendees participated in polling, broadly representing private (45%) and academic (34%) practices from all regions of the United States. Eighty-nine percent reported taking emergency calls (75% at least twice per week), with the majority (57%) not receiving a stipend. Only 9% responded that routine emergency cases are frequently transferred from their hospital. The majority (60%) either agreed or strongly agreed that there are problems with neurosurgery emergency coverage in their region. Before the session, 89% were opposed to the acute care surgery initiative as a solution for neurosurgery emergency coverage and 85% favored regionalization of emergency care. Opinions did not change significantly following expert presentations and discussion. CONCLUSION: Neurosurgeons polled during a 2008 CNS consensus session opposed creation of an acute care surgery specialty within general surgery that covers neurosurgical emergencies, but they favored neurosurgical emergency care regionalization. The CNS consensus sessions provide a forum for discussing socioeconomic and professional issues important to neurological surgery and for formulating preliminary information and strategies of use to regulatory stakeholders in addressing these issues.

AB - OBJECTIVE: Organized general surgery has recently proposed creation of a new acute care surgery subspecialty to include emergency care of basic neurosurgical and orthopedic surgical problems. Little is known about neurosurgical attitudes toward this proposal and alternative methods of improving access to emergency neurosurgical care. METHODS: During a consensus session at the 2008 Annual Meeting of the Congress of Neurological Surgeons (CNS), electronic data were collected regarding neurosurgeons?' attitudes toward acute care surgery, emergency neurosurgical care regionalization, and other regulatory options. RESULTS: Ninety-nine attendees participated in polling, broadly representing private (45%) and academic (34%) practices from all regions of the United States. Eighty-nine percent reported taking emergency calls (75% at least twice per week), with the majority (57%) not receiving a stipend. Only 9% responded that routine emergency cases are frequently transferred from their hospital. The majority (60%) either agreed or strongly agreed that there are problems with neurosurgery emergency coverage in their region. Before the session, 89% were opposed to the acute care surgery initiative as a solution for neurosurgery emergency coverage and 85% favored regionalization of emergency care. Opinions did not change significantly following expert presentations and discussion. CONCLUSION: Neurosurgeons polled during a 2008 CNS consensus session opposed creation of an acute care surgery specialty within general surgery that covers neurosurgical emergencies, but they favored neurosurgical emergency care regionalization. The CNS consensus sessions provide a forum for discussing socioeconomic and professional issues important to neurological surgery and for formulating preliminary information and strategies of use to regulatory stakeholders in addressing these issues.

KW - Acute care

KW - Congress of Neurological Surgeons

KW - Neurosurgeon

KW - Neurosurgery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952901386&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952901386&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318209cde0

DO - 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318209cde0

M3 - Article

C2 - 21242840

AN - SCOPUS:79952901386

VL - 68

SP - 1063

EP - 1068

JO - Neurosurgery

JF - Neurosurgery

SN - 0148-396X

IS - 4

ER -