Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act and trauma triage

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA) was conceived as a means to ensure that patients with emergent conditions would receive stabilizing care and to avert the potentially dangerous, economically driven, interhospital transfer of patients. This legislation and its subsequent application arrived near the time that regional and statewide trauma systems were established. Trauma systems were developed to guide optimal resource use for the injured patient regardless of the patient's ability to pay. Unfortunately, when coupled with current economic and litigation threats to community emergency and surgical practitioners, EMTALA represents a threat to the continuation of the trauma system concept. Trauma systems are dependent on a tiered hospital network where severely injured patients are taken to a hospital with resources aligned to manage the worst of injuries. When primary triage from the field cannot accomplish this task, secondary triage from a nondesignated or lower-level hospital to the higher-level trauma center is needed. EMTALA has served as a driver to change the priority for secondary triage from addressing the needs of the severely injured patient to filling community hospital surgical specialist emergency department on-call coverage gaps for less severely injured patients. Further, legal action associated with claims of EMTALA violations has needlessly extended medical examination and "stabilization" efforts at community emergency departments prior to needed secondary triage. Higher-level trauma centers will benefit from codifying system-wide emergency medical services practices related to primary and secondary triage, establishing trauma center capacity and divert practices, and initiating "transfer center" operations that control transfer of patients to these centers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)332-339
Number of pages8
JournalPrehospital Emergency Care
Volume10
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2006

Fingerprint

Emergency Treatment
Triage
Trauma Centers
Wounds and Injuries
Patient Transfer
Hospital Emergency Service
Community Hospital
Jurisprudence
Emergency Medical Services
Legislation
Emergencies
Economics

Keywords

  • EMTALA
  • Medicolegal
  • Trauma transfer
  • Trauma triage

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act and trauma triage. / Hedges, Jerris; Newgard, Craig; Mullins, Richard.

In: Prehospital Emergency Care, Vol. 10, No. 3, 01.09.2006, p. 332-339.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{abd65f733aa94921a434cdc6d4f8cce5,
title = "Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act and trauma triage",
abstract = "The Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA) was conceived as a means to ensure that patients with emergent conditions would receive stabilizing care and to avert the potentially dangerous, economically driven, interhospital transfer of patients. This legislation and its subsequent application arrived near the time that regional and statewide trauma systems were established. Trauma systems were developed to guide optimal resource use for the injured patient regardless of the patient's ability to pay. Unfortunately, when coupled with current economic and litigation threats to community emergency and surgical practitioners, EMTALA represents a threat to the continuation of the trauma system concept. Trauma systems are dependent on a tiered hospital network where severely injured patients are taken to a hospital with resources aligned to manage the worst of injuries. When primary triage from the field cannot accomplish this task, secondary triage from a nondesignated or lower-level hospital to the higher-level trauma center is needed. EMTALA has served as a driver to change the priority for secondary triage from addressing the needs of the severely injured patient to filling community hospital surgical specialist emergency department on-call coverage gaps for less severely injured patients. Further, legal action associated with claims of EMTALA violations has needlessly extended medical examination and {"}stabilization{"} efforts at community emergency departments prior to needed secondary triage. Higher-level trauma centers will benefit from codifying system-wide emergency medical services practices related to primary and secondary triage, establishing trauma center capacity and divert practices, and initiating {"}transfer center{"} operations that control transfer of patients to these centers.",
keywords = "EMTALA, Medicolegal, Trauma transfer, Trauma triage",
author = "Jerris Hedges and Craig Newgard and Richard Mullins",
year = "2006",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/10903120600728763",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "332--339",
journal = "Prehospital Emergency Care",
issn = "1090-3127",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act and trauma triage

AU - Hedges, Jerris

AU - Newgard, Craig

AU - Mullins, Richard

PY - 2006/9/1

Y1 - 2006/9/1

N2 - The Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA) was conceived as a means to ensure that patients with emergent conditions would receive stabilizing care and to avert the potentially dangerous, economically driven, interhospital transfer of patients. This legislation and its subsequent application arrived near the time that regional and statewide trauma systems were established. Trauma systems were developed to guide optimal resource use for the injured patient regardless of the patient's ability to pay. Unfortunately, when coupled with current economic and litigation threats to community emergency and surgical practitioners, EMTALA represents a threat to the continuation of the trauma system concept. Trauma systems are dependent on a tiered hospital network where severely injured patients are taken to a hospital with resources aligned to manage the worst of injuries. When primary triage from the field cannot accomplish this task, secondary triage from a nondesignated or lower-level hospital to the higher-level trauma center is needed. EMTALA has served as a driver to change the priority for secondary triage from addressing the needs of the severely injured patient to filling community hospital surgical specialist emergency department on-call coverage gaps for less severely injured patients. Further, legal action associated with claims of EMTALA violations has needlessly extended medical examination and "stabilization" efforts at community emergency departments prior to needed secondary triage. Higher-level trauma centers will benefit from codifying system-wide emergency medical services practices related to primary and secondary triage, establishing trauma center capacity and divert practices, and initiating "transfer center" operations that control transfer of patients to these centers.

AB - The Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA) was conceived as a means to ensure that patients with emergent conditions would receive stabilizing care and to avert the potentially dangerous, economically driven, interhospital transfer of patients. This legislation and its subsequent application arrived near the time that regional and statewide trauma systems were established. Trauma systems were developed to guide optimal resource use for the injured patient regardless of the patient's ability to pay. Unfortunately, when coupled with current economic and litigation threats to community emergency and surgical practitioners, EMTALA represents a threat to the continuation of the trauma system concept. Trauma systems are dependent on a tiered hospital network where severely injured patients are taken to a hospital with resources aligned to manage the worst of injuries. When primary triage from the field cannot accomplish this task, secondary triage from a nondesignated or lower-level hospital to the higher-level trauma center is needed. EMTALA has served as a driver to change the priority for secondary triage from addressing the needs of the severely injured patient to filling community hospital surgical specialist emergency department on-call coverage gaps for less severely injured patients. Further, legal action associated with claims of EMTALA violations has needlessly extended medical examination and "stabilization" efforts at community emergency departments prior to needed secondary triage. Higher-level trauma centers will benefit from codifying system-wide emergency medical services practices related to primary and secondary triage, establishing trauma center capacity and divert practices, and initiating "transfer center" operations that control transfer of patients to these centers.

KW - EMTALA

KW - Medicolegal

KW - Trauma transfer

KW - Trauma triage

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33745684157&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33745684157&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10903120600728763

DO - 10.1080/10903120600728763

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 332

EP - 339

JO - Prehospital Emergency Care

JF - Prehospital Emergency Care

SN - 1090-3127

IS - 3

ER -