Emergency medical service providers' attitudes andexperiences regarding enrolling patients in clinical research trials

Terri Schmidt, Maria Nelson, Mohamud Ramzan Daya, Nicole Deiorio, Denise Griffiths, Pontine Rosteck

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate Emergency Medical Services (EMS) providers' attitudes andexperiences about enrolling patients in clinical research trials utilizing the federal rules for exception from informed consent. We hypothesized that Emergency Medical Technicians (EMTs) would have varied attitudes about research using an exception from informed consent which could have an impact on the research. Methods andsetting: Since January 2007, the EMS system has been participating in a randomized, multi-center interventional trial in which out-of-hospital providers enroll critically injured trauma patients using exception from informed consent.A voluntary, anonymous, written survey was administered to EMS providers during an in-service. The survey included demographics andLikert-type questions about their experiences with andattitudes towards research in general, andresearch using an exception from informed consent for an out-of-hospital clinical trial. Results: The response rate was 79.3 (844/1067). Most respondents, 93.3, agreed that "research in EMS care is important." However, 38.5 also agreed that individual EMTs/paramedics should maintain the personal right of refusal to enroll patients in EMS trials. Fifty-four percent of respondents agreed with the statement that "the right of research subjects to make their own choices is more important than the interests of the general community." In response to statements about the current study, 11.3 agreed that "the study is unethical because the patient cannot consent" and69.2 responded that they would personally be willing to be enrolled in the study before they were able to give consent if they were seriously injured. Those who had not enrolled a patient into the study (681 respondents) were asked their reasons: 76.8 had not encountered an eligible patient or did not work for an agency that carried the fluid; 4.3 did not have time; 4.1 forgot and1.1 stated that they were opposed to enrolling patients in studies without their consent. Conclusion: The majority of EMS personnel in one community support EMS research andthis specific out-of-hospital clinical trial being conducted under an exception from informed consent. Potential barriers to enrollment were identified. Further study in other systems is warranted to better understand EMS provider perspectives about exception from informed consent research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)160-168
Number of pages9
JournalPrehospital Emergency Care
Volume13
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Emergency Medical Services
Informed Consent
Clinical Trials
Research
Emergency Medical Technicians
Research Subjects
Allied Health Personnel
Biomedical Research
Demography
Surveys and Questionnaires
Wounds and Injuries

Keywords

  • Consent in research
  • EMS research
  • Paramedic attitudes
  • Research ethics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine
  • Emergency
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Emergency medical service providers' attitudes andexperiences regarding enrolling patients in clinical research trials. / Schmidt, Terri; Nelson, Maria; Daya, Mohamud Ramzan; Deiorio, Nicole; Griffiths, Denise; Rosteck, Pontine.

In: Prehospital Emergency Care, Vol. 13, No. 2, 2009, p. 160-168.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Schmidt, Terri ; Nelson, Maria ; Daya, Mohamud Ramzan ; Deiorio, Nicole ; Griffiths, Denise ; Rosteck, Pontine. / Emergency medical service providers' attitudes andexperiences regarding enrolling patients in clinical research trials. In: Prehospital Emergency Care. 2009 ; Vol. 13, No. 2. pp. 160-168.
@article{11c593dde491402b87858e646c7582cb,
title = "Emergency medical service providers' attitudes andexperiences regarding enrolling patients in clinical research trials",
abstract = "Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate Emergency Medical Services (EMS) providers' attitudes andexperiences about enrolling patients in clinical research trials utilizing the federal rules for exception from informed consent. We hypothesized that Emergency Medical Technicians (EMTs) would have varied attitudes about research using an exception from informed consent which could have an impact on the research. Methods andsetting: Since January 2007, the EMS system has been participating in a randomized, multi-center interventional trial in which out-of-hospital providers enroll critically injured trauma patients using exception from informed consent.A voluntary, anonymous, written survey was administered to EMS providers during an in-service. The survey included demographics andLikert-type questions about their experiences with andattitudes towards research in general, andresearch using an exception from informed consent for an out-of-hospital clinical trial. Results: The response rate was 79.3 (844/1067). Most respondents, 93.3, agreed that {"}research in EMS care is important.{"} However, 38.5 also agreed that individual EMTs/paramedics should maintain the personal right of refusal to enroll patients in EMS trials. Fifty-four percent of respondents agreed with the statement that {"}the right of research subjects to make their own choices is more important than the interests of the general community.{"} In response to statements about the current study, 11.3 agreed that {"}the study is unethical because the patient cannot consent{"} and69.2 responded that they would personally be willing to be enrolled in the study before they were able to give consent if they were seriously injured. Those who had not enrolled a patient into the study (681 respondents) were asked their reasons: 76.8 had not encountered an eligible patient or did not work for an agency that carried the fluid; 4.3 did not have time; 4.1 forgot and1.1 stated that they were opposed to enrolling patients in studies without their consent. Conclusion: The majority of EMS personnel in one community support EMS research andthis specific out-of-hospital clinical trial being conducted under an exception from informed consent. Potential barriers to enrollment were identified. Further study in other systems is warranted to better understand EMS provider perspectives about exception from informed consent research.",
keywords = "Consent in research, EMS research, Paramedic attitudes, Research ethics",
author = "Terri Schmidt and Maria Nelson and Daya, {Mohamud Ramzan} and Nicole Deiorio and Denise Griffiths and Pontine Rosteck",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1080/10903120802708852",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
pages = "160--168",
journal = "Prehospital Emergency Care",
issn = "1090-3127",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Emergency medical service providers' attitudes andexperiences regarding enrolling patients in clinical research trials

AU - Schmidt, Terri

AU - Nelson, Maria

AU - Daya, Mohamud Ramzan

AU - Deiorio, Nicole

AU - Griffiths, Denise

AU - Rosteck, Pontine

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate Emergency Medical Services (EMS) providers' attitudes andexperiences about enrolling patients in clinical research trials utilizing the federal rules for exception from informed consent. We hypothesized that Emergency Medical Technicians (EMTs) would have varied attitudes about research using an exception from informed consent which could have an impact on the research. Methods andsetting: Since January 2007, the EMS system has been participating in a randomized, multi-center interventional trial in which out-of-hospital providers enroll critically injured trauma patients using exception from informed consent.A voluntary, anonymous, written survey was administered to EMS providers during an in-service. The survey included demographics andLikert-type questions about their experiences with andattitudes towards research in general, andresearch using an exception from informed consent for an out-of-hospital clinical trial. Results: The response rate was 79.3 (844/1067). Most respondents, 93.3, agreed that "research in EMS care is important." However, 38.5 also agreed that individual EMTs/paramedics should maintain the personal right of refusal to enroll patients in EMS trials. Fifty-four percent of respondents agreed with the statement that "the right of research subjects to make their own choices is more important than the interests of the general community." In response to statements about the current study, 11.3 agreed that "the study is unethical because the patient cannot consent" and69.2 responded that they would personally be willing to be enrolled in the study before they were able to give consent if they were seriously injured. Those who had not enrolled a patient into the study (681 respondents) were asked their reasons: 76.8 had not encountered an eligible patient or did not work for an agency that carried the fluid; 4.3 did not have time; 4.1 forgot and1.1 stated that they were opposed to enrolling patients in studies without their consent. Conclusion: The majority of EMS personnel in one community support EMS research andthis specific out-of-hospital clinical trial being conducted under an exception from informed consent. Potential barriers to enrollment were identified. Further study in other systems is warranted to better understand EMS provider perspectives about exception from informed consent research.

AB - Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate Emergency Medical Services (EMS) providers' attitudes andexperiences about enrolling patients in clinical research trials utilizing the federal rules for exception from informed consent. We hypothesized that Emergency Medical Technicians (EMTs) would have varied attitudes about research using an exception from informed consent which could have an impact on the research. Methods andsetting: Since January 2007, the EMS system has been participating in a randomized, multi-center interventional trial in which out-of-hospital providers enroll critically injured trauma patients using exception from informed consent.A voluntary, anonymous, written survey was administered to EMS providers during an in-service. The survey included demographics andLikert-type questions about their experiences with andattitudes towards research in general, andresearch using an exception from informed consent for an out-of-hospital clinical trial. Results: The response rate was 79.3 (844/1067). Most respondents, 93.3, agreed that "research in EMS care is important." However, 38.5 also agreed that individual EMTs/paramedics should maintain the personal right of refusal to enroll patients in EMS trials. Fifty-four percent of respondents agreed with the statement that "the right of research subjects to make their own choices is more important than the interests of the general community." In response to statements about the current study, 11.3 agreed that "the study is unethical because the patient cannot consent" and69.2 responded that they would personally be willing to be enrolled in the study before they were able to give consent if they were seriously injured. Those who had not enrolled a patient into the study (681 respondents) were asked their reasons: 76.8 had not encountered an eligible patient or did not work for an agency that carried the fluid; 4.3 did not have time; 4.1 forgot and1.1 stated that they were opposed to enrolling patients in studies without their consent. Conclusion: The majority of EMS personnel in one community support EMS research andthis specific out-of-hospital clinical trial being conducted under an exception from informed consent. Potential barriers to enrollment were identified. Further study in other systems is warranted to better understand EMS provider perspectives about exception from informed consent research.

KW - Consent in research

KW - EMS research

KW - Paramedic attitudes

KW - Research ethics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70350678846&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70350678846&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10903120802708852

DO - 10.1080/10903120802708852

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 160

EP - 168

JO - Prehospital Emergency Care

JF - Prehospital Emergency Care

SN - 1090-3127

IS - 2

ER -