Emergency department patients who leave without seeing a physician: The Toronto Hospital experience

Christopher MB Fernandes, Mohamud Ramzan Daya, Susan Barry, Noel Palmer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

91 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study objectives: To determine why emergency departmentpatients leave without being seen by a physician and whether they receive alternate medical care. Design: A prospective, cross-sectional study of patients who left without being seen. Charts were reviewed for population demographics, presenting complaints, and clinical acuity rating. Follow-up was achieved within 6 weeks through mailed survey questionnaires and telephone interviews. Setting: Two inner-city EDs of the Toronto Hospital, a quaternarycare facility. Participants: All 423 patients who registered for care and leftwithout being seen during a 16-week period from January to May 1991. Results: Of 23,933 registered patients, 423 (1.4%) left withoutbeing seen. Follow-up was achieved on 39% of patients (165 of 423). Sixty-seven percent of those who left (284 of 423) had low acuity ratings. Of the 165 survey respondents, 107 (65%) left between 30 minutes and 2 hours after registration. The major reasons cited for leaving included prolonged waiting time (99 of 165, 60%), perceived difficulties with hospital staff (46 of 165, 28%), and pressing commitments elsewhere (45 of 165, 27%). Ninety-two percent (152 of 165) believed they should be evaluated by a physician within 1 hour of presentation. Forty-eight percent (80 of 165) sought further medical attention within 24 hours. Personal physicians (65 of 165, 39%) and other EDs (29 of 165, 18%) were the most common sources of further medical care. Conclusion: The majority of survey respondents had a low acuity rating and left because of prolonged waiting times. Most of these patients sought alternate medical care through their personal physician or other EDs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1092-1096
Number of pages5
JournalAnnals of Emergency Medicine
Volume24
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 1994

Fingerprint

Hospital Emergency Service
Physicians
Emergencies
Cross-Sectional Studies
Demography
Surveys and Questionnaires
Interviews
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Emergency department patients who leave without seeing a physician : The Toronto Hospital experience. / Fernandes, Christopher MB; Daya, Mohamud Ramzan; Barry, Susan; Palmer, Noel.

In: Annals of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 24, No. 6, 1994, p. 1092-1096.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fernandes, Christopher MB ; Daya, Mohamud Ramzan ; Barry, Susan ; Palmer, Noel. / Emergency department patients who leave without seeing a physician : The Toronto Hospital experience. In: Annals of Emergency Medicine. 1994 ; Vol. 24, No. 6. pp. 1092-1096.
@article{b141917947e84d128c71b90f7dc3f1b0,
title = "Emergency department patients who leave without seeing a physician: The Toronto Hospital experience",
abstract = "Study objectives: To determine why emergency departmentpatients leave without being seen by a physician and whether they receive alternate medical care. Design: A prospective, cross-sectional study of patients who left without being seen. Charts were reviewed for population demographics, presenting complaints, and clinical acuity rating. Follow-up was achieved within 6 weeks through mailed survey questionnaires and telephone interviews. Setting: Two inner-city EDs of the Toronto Hospital, a quaternarycare facility. Participants: All 423 patients who registered for care and leftwithout being seen during a 16-week period from January to May 1991. Results: Of 23,933 registered patients, 423 (1.4{\%}) left withoutbeing seen. Follow-up was achieved on 39{\%} of patients (165 of 423). Sixty-seven percent of those who left (284 of 423) had low acuity ratings. Of the 165 survey respondents, 107 (65{\%}) left between 30 minutes and 2 hours after registration. The major reasons cited for leaving included prolonged waiting time (99 of 165, 60{\%}), perceived difficulties with hospital staff (46 of 165, 28{\%}), and pressing commitments elsewhere (45 of 165, 27{\%}). Ninety-two percent (152 of 165) believed they should be evaluated by a physician within 1 hour of presentation. Forty-eight percent (80 of 165) sought further medical attention within 24 hours. Personal physicians (65 of 165, 39{\%}) and other EDs (29 of 165, 18{\%}) were the most common sources of further medical care. Conclusion: The majority of survey respondents had a low acuity rating and left because of prolonged waiting times. Most of these patients sought alternate medical care through their personal physician or other EDs.",
author = "Fernandes, {Christopher MB} and Daya, {Mohamud Ramzan} and Susan Barry and Noel Palmer",
year = "1994",
doi = "10.1016/S0196-0644(94)70238-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "1092--1096",
journal = "Annals of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "0196-0644",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Emergency department patients who leave without seeing a physician

T2 - The Toronto Hospital experience

AU - Fernandes, Christopher MB

AU - Daya, Mohamud Ramzan

AU - Barry, Susan

AU - Palmer, Noel

PY - 1994

Y1 - 1994

N2 - Study objectives: To determine why emergency departmentpatients leave without being seen by a physician and whether they receive alternate medical care. Design: A prospective, cross-sectional study of patients who left without being seen. Charts were reviewed for population demographics, presenting complaints, and clinical acuity rating. Follow-up was achieved within 6 weeks through mailed survey questionnaires and telephone interviews. Setting: Two inner-city EDs of the Toronto Hospital, a quaternarycare facility. Participants: All 423 patients who registered for care and leftwithout being seen during a 16-week period from January to May 1991. Results: Of 23,933 registered patients, 423 (1.4%) left withoutbeing seen. Follow-up was achieved on 39% of patients (165 of 423). Sixty-seven percent of those who left (284 of 423) had low acuity ratings. Of the 165 survey respondents, 107 (65%) left between 30 minutes and 2 hours after registration. The major reasons cited for leaving included prolonged waiting time (99 of 165, 60%), perceived difficulties with hospital staff (46 of 165, 28%), and pressing commitments elsewhere (45 of 165, 27%). Ninety-two percent (152 of 165) believed they should be evaluated by a physician within 1 hour of presentation. Forty-eight percent (80 of 165) sought further medical attention within 24 hours. Personal physicians (65 of 165, 39%) and other EDs (29 of 165, 18%) were the most common sources of further medical care. Conclusion: The majority of survey respondents had a low acuity rating and left because of prolonged waiting times. Most of these patients sought alternate medical care through their personal physician or other EDs.

AB - Study objectives: To determine why emergency departmentpatients leave without being seen by a physician and whether they receive alternate medical care. Design: A prospective, cross-sectional study of patients who left without being seen. Charts were reviewed for population demographics, presenting complaints, and clinical acuity rating. Follow-up was achieved within 6 weeks through mailed survey questionnaires and telephone interviews. Setting: Two inner-city EDs of the Toronto Hospital, a quaternarycare facility. Participants: All 423 patients who registered for care and leftwithout being seen during a 16-week period from January to May 1991. Results: Of 23,933 registered patients, 423 (1.4%) left withoutbeing seen. Follow-up was achieved on 39% of patients (165 of 423). Sixty-seven percent of those who left (284 of 423) had low acuity ratings. Of the 165 survey respondents, 107 (65%) left between 30 minutes and 2 hours after registration. The major reasons cited for leaving included prolonged waiting time (99 of 165, 60%), perceived difficulties with hospital staff (46 of 165, 28%), and pressing commitments elsewhere (45 of 165, 27%). Ninety-two percent (152 of 165) believed they should be evaluated by a physician within 1 hour of presentation. Forty-eight percent (80 of 165) sought further medical attention within 24 hours. Personal physicians (65 of 165, 39%) and other EDs (29 of 165, 18%) were the most common sources of further medical care. Conclusion: The majority of survey respondents had a low acuity rating and left because of prolonged waiting times. Most of these patients sought alternate medical care through their personal physician or other EDs.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028036961&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028036961&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0196-0644(94)70238-1

DO - 10.1016/S0196-0644(94)70238-1

M3 - Article

C2 - 7978590

AN - SCOPUS:0028036961

VL - 24

SP - 1092

EP - 1096

JO - Annals of Emergency Medicine

JF - Annals of Emergency Medicine

SN - 0196-0644

IS - 6

ER -