TY - JOUR
T1 - Electrophysiologic findings and long-term outcomes in patients undergoing third or more catheter ablation procedures for atrial fibrillation
AU - Lin, David
AU - Santangeli, Pasquale
AU - Zado, Erica S.
AU - Bala, Rupa
AU - Hutchinson, Mathew D.
AU - Riley, Michael P.
AU - Frankel, David S.
AU - Garcia, Fermin
AU - Dixit, Sanjay
AU - Callans, David J.
AU - Marchlinski, Francis E.
PY - 2015/4/1
Y1 - 2015/4/1
N2 - Introduction Pulmonary vein (PV) status, arrhythmia sources, and outcomes with ≥3 ablation procedures have not been characterized. Methods and Results All patients with ≥3 procedures were included and underwent antral reisolation of reconnected PVs and ablation of non-PV triggers. Of 2,886 patients who underwent PVI, 181 (6%) had more than 2 ablation procedures (3 procedures in 146 and ≥4 procedures in 35). In 12 patients, the clinical arrhythmia was other than AF. Of the remaining 169 patients, 69 (41%) had 4 reconnected PVs, 27 (16%) had 3, 31 (18%) had 2, and 29 (17%) had 1. Only 13 (8%) had all PVs still isolated. Provocative techniques in 127 patients initiated PV triggers in 92 patients, including AF or PV atrial tachycardia in 64 (50%), and reproducible PV APDs in 28 (22%). Thirty-six (20%) had a new non-PV trigger targeted. At a mean of 36 months (12-119 months) after last procedure, 63 patients (47%) had no AF off antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD); 28 (21%) had no AF with AAD; and 18 (13%) had rare AF with good symptom control; 26 patients (19%) had recurrent AF. Conclusions At time of third or greater AF ablation, PV reconnection is the rule (92%) and PV triggers initiating AF can be demonstrated. Following repeat PVI and targeting non-PV triggers, 81% of patients had clinical AF control. Our findings suggest that PV reisolation and attempts to identify and eliminate non-PV triggers are effective and support the role of multiple repeat procedures for AF recurrence.
AB - Introduction Pulmonary vein (PV) status, arrhythmia sources, and outcomes with ≥3 ablation procedures have not been characterized. Methods and Results All patients with ≥3 procedures were included and underwent antral reisolation of reconnected PVs and ablation of non-PV triggers. Of 2,886 patients who underwent PVI, 181 (6%) had more than 2 ablation procedures (3 procedures in 146 and ≥4 procedures in 35). In 12 patients, the clinical arrhythmia was other than AF. Of the remaining 169 patients, 69 (41%) had 4 reconnected PVs, 27 (16%) had 3, 31 (18%) had 2, and 29 (17%) had 1. Only 13 (8%) had all PVs still isolated. Provocative techniques in 127 patients initiated PV triggers in 92 patients, including AF or PV atrial tachycardia in 64 (50%), and reproducible PV APDs in 28 (22%). Thirty-six (20%) had a new non-PV trigger targeted. At a mean of 36 months (12-119 months) after last procedure, 63 patients (47%) had no AF off antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD); 28 (21%) had no AF with AAD; and 18 (13%) had rare AF with good symptom control; 26 patients (19%) had recurrent AF. Conclusions At time of third or greater AF ablation, PV reconnection is the rule (92%) and PV triggers initiating AF can be demonstrated. Following repeat PVI and targeting non-PV triggers, 81% of patients had clinical AF control. Our findings suggest that PV reisolation and attempts to identify and eliminate non-PV triggers are effective and support the role of multiple repeat procedures for AF recurrence.
KW - atrial fibrillation
KW - catheter ablation
KW - pulmonary vein isolation
KW - reconnection
KW - repeat ablation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84927693899&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84927693899&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/jce.12603
DO - 10.1111/jce.12603
M3 - Article
C2 - 25534677
AN - SCOPUS:84927693899
SN - 1045-3873
VL - 26
SP - 371
EP - 377
JO - Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
JF - Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
IS - 4
ER -