Electrically stimulated increases in cochlear blood flow: II. Evidence of neural mediation

J. S. Sillman, R. I. Masta, M. J. LaRouere, Alfred Nuttall, J. M. Miller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In a companion paper, we reported that electrical stimulation increased cochlear blood flow (CBF). This response was found to be an increasing function of current intensity and was frequency-selective, with the best response at approximately 500 Hz continuous sinusoidal current. The present investigation seeks to discover the mechanism of this effect. Direct measurement of cochlear temperature during electrical stimulation revealed no evidence of local heating. Autonomic neuronal activation is not likely, as neither atropine, hexamethonium, nor propranolol abolished the evoked CBF response. Strial activity could be suppressed by the use of furosemide, but the evoked CBF response persisted. Inactivation of auditory afferent neurons with kainic acid also did not change the evoked CBF response. Dimethyl sulfoxide, a potent oxygen-free radical scavenger, did suppress the evoked CBF response to a small but significant degree. This suggests that oxygen-free radicals may be produced within the cochlea during electrical stimulation. Finally, the evoked CBF response was completely suppressed by procaine and tetrodotoxin, with recovery of evoked CBF response accompanying recovery of cochlear action potentials. These data indicate that stimulation of neural fibers, distinct from autonomic and auditory afferent neurons, may modulate CBF.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)362-374
Number of pages13
JournalOtolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
Volume101
Issue number3
StatePublished - 1989
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cochlea
Electric Stimulation
Afferent Neurons
Reactive Oxygen Species
Hexamethonium
Free Radical Scavengers
Procaine
Kainic Acid
Furosemide
Tetrodotoxin
Dimethyl Sulfoxide
Atropine
Propranolol
Heating
Action Potentials
Free Radicals

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Electrically stimulated increases in cochlear blood flow : II. Evidence of neural mediation. / Sillman, J. S.; Masta, R. I.; LaRouere, M. J.; Nuttall, Alfred; Miller, J. M.

In: Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Vol. 101, No. 3, 1989, p. 362-374.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sillman, J. S. ; Masta, R. I. ; LaRouere, M. J. ; Nuttall, Alfred ; Miller, J. M. / Electrically stimulated increases in cochlear blood flow : II. Evidence of neural mediation. In: Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery. 1989 ; Vol. 101, No. 3. pp. 362-374.
@article{adccdf81497149a8bb32b7bab92799b1,
title = "Electrically stimulated increases in cochlear blood flow: II. Evidence of neural mediation",
abstract = "In a companion paper, we reported that electrical stimulation increased cochlear blood flow (CBF). This response was found to be an increasing function of current intensity and was frequency-selective, with the best response at approximately 500 Hz continuous sinusoidal current. The present investigation seeks to discover the mechanism of this effect. Direct measurement of cochlear temperature during electrical stimulation revealed no evidence of local heating. Autonomic neuronal activation is not likely, as neither atropine, hexamethonium, nor propranolol abolished the evoked CBF response. Strial activity could be suppressed by the use of furosemide, but the evoked CBF response persisted. Inactivation of auditory afferent neurons with kainic acid also did not change the evoked CBF response. Dimethyl sulfoxide, a potent oxygen-free radical scavenger, did suppress the evoked CBF response to a small but significant degree. This suggests that oxygen-free radicals may be produced within the cochlea during electrical stimulation. Finally, the evoked CBF response was completely suppressed by procaine and tetrodotoxin, with recovery of evoked CBF response accompanying recovery of cochlear action potentials. These data indicate that stimulation of neural fibers, distinct from autonomic and auditory afferent neurons, may modulate CBF.",
author = "Sillman, {J. S.} and Masta, {R. I.} and LaRouere, {M. J.} and Alfred Nuttall and Miller, {J. M.}",
year = "1989",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "101",
pages = "362--374",
journal = "Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)",
issn = "0194-5998",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Electrically stimulated increases in cochlear blood flow

T2 - II. Evidence of neural mediation

AU - Sillman, J. S.

AU - Masta, R. I.

AU - LaRouere, M. J.

AU - Nuttall, Alfred

AU - Miller, J. M.

PY - 1989

Y1 - 1989

N2 - In a companion paper, we reported that electrical stimulation increased cochlear blood flow (CBF). This response was found to be an increasing function of current intensity and was frequency-selective, with the best response at approximately 500 Hz continuous sinusoidal current. The present investigation seeks to discover the mechanism of this effect. Direct measurement of cochlear temperature during electrical stimulation revealed no evidence of local heating. Autonomic neuronal activation is not likely, as neither atropine, hexamethonium, nor propranolol abolished the evoked CBF response. Strial activity could be suppressed by the use of furosemide, but the evoked CBF response persisted. Inactivation of auditory afferent neurons with kainic acid also did not change the evoked CBF response. Dimethyl sulfoxide, a potent oxygen-free radical scavenger, did suppress the evoked CBF response to a small but significant degree. This suggests that oxygen-free radicals may be produced within the cochlea during electrical stimulation. Finally, the evoked CBF response was completely suppressed by procaine and tetrodotoxin, with recovery of evoked CBF response accompanying recovery of cochlear action potentials. These data indicate that stimulation of neural fibers, distinct from autonomic and auditory afferent neurons, may modulate CBF.

AB - In a companion paper, we reported that electrical stimulation increased cochlear blood flow (CBF). This response was found to be an increasing function of current intensity and was frequency-selective, with the best response at approximately 500 Hz continuous sinusoidal current. The present investigation seeks to discover the mechanism of this effect. Direct measurement of cochlear temperature during electrical stimulation revealed no evidence of local heating. Autonomic neuronal activation is not likely, as neither atropine, hexamethonium, nor propranolol abolished the evoked CBF response. Strial activity could be suppressed by the use of furosemide, but the evoked CBF response persisted. Inactivation of auditory afferent neurons with kainic acid also did not change the evoked CBF response. Dimethyl sulfoxide, a potent oxygen-free radical scavenger, did suppress the evoked CBF response to a small but significant degree. This suggests that oxygen-free radicals may be produced within the cochlea during electrical stimulation. Finally, the evoked CBF response was completely suppressed by procaine and tetrodotoxin, with recovery of evoked CBF response accompanying recovery of cochlear action potentials. These data indicate that stimulation of neural fibers, distinct from autonomic and auditory afferent neurons, may modulate CBF.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024432351&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024432351&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 2508007

AN - SCOPUS:0024432351

VL - 101

SP - 362

EP - 374

JO - Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)

JF - Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States)

SN - 0194-5998

IS - 3

ER -