Effects of orbital decay on satellite-derived lower-tropospheric temperature trends

Frank J. Wentz, Matthias Schabel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

111 Scopus citations

Abstract

The 17-year lower-tropospheric temperature record derived from the satellite Microwave Sounding Unit (MSU)1-3 shows a global cooling trend, from 1979 to 1995, of -0.05 K per decade at an altitude of about 3.5 km (refs 4,5). Air temperatures measured at the Earth's surface, in contrast, have risen by approximately +0.13 K per decade over the same period4,6. The two temperature records are derived from measurements of different physical parameters, and thus are not directly comparable. In fact, the lower stratosphere is cooling substantially (by about -0.5 K per decade)5, so the warming trend seen at the surface is expected to diminish with altitude and change into a cooling trend at some point in the trophosphere. Even so, it has been suggested that the cooling trend seen in the satellite data is excessive4,7,8. The difficulty in reconciling the information from these different sources has sparked a debate in the climate community about possible instrumental problems and the existence of global warming4,7,9. Here we identify an artificial cooling trend in the satellite-derived temperature series caused by previously neglected orbital-decay effects. We find a new, corrected estimate of +0.07 K per decade for the MSU-based temperature trend, which is in closer agreement with surface temperatures. We also find that the reported7 cooling of the lower trophosphere, relative to the middle troposphere, is another artefact caused by uncorrected orbital- decay effects.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)661-664
Number of pages4
JournalNature
Volume394
Issue number6694
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 13 1998
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effects of orbital decay on satellite-derived lower-tropospheric temperature trends'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this