Effects of multiple delayed rewards on delay discounting in an adjusting amount procedure

Suzanne Mitchell, Abigail J. Rosenthal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It has been suggested that when the delivery of several rewards is separated in time, e.g. one reward immediately and a second reward a few moments later, the value of an alternative that includes these "bundled" rewards will be the sum of the hyperbolic discount functions of the individual rewards. The current study examined this hypothesis using an adjusting amount procedure. In this procedure, rats chose between a delayed food alternative and an immediate food alternative, where the amount of immediate food altered according to each rat's choices. The size of the immediate reward when rats were indifferent between the delayed and immediate alternatives indexed the value of the delayed alternative. Discount functions describing the relationship between the indifference points and the delay to food were created for conditions in which the delay alternative consisted of a single reward (150μl of sucrose solution) delayed by 0, 2, 4, 8, or 16s following the reinforced response. These functions were used to predict the indifference points in other conditions for which an additional 150μl of sucrose solution was delivered at 0, 4, 8, or 16s following the reinforced response. The model fit the data well. However, there were systematic deviations that suggested animals were sensitive to the context within which delays were presented, in addition to the delays themselves. That is, preference for the delayed alternative was lower than predicted when the delay to the additional reward was long (8 or 16s) and higher than the predicted values when it was short (0 or 4s).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)273-286
Number of pages14
JournalBehavioural Processes
Volume64
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 31 2003

Fingerprint

Reward
food
rats
sucrose
Food
Sucrose
Delay Discounting
effect
animal
animals

Keywords

  • Choice
  • Delay discounting
  • Lever press
  • Multiple rewards
  • Rats

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Effects of multiple delayed rewards on delay discounting in an adjusting amount procedure. / Mitchell, Suzanne; Rosenthal, Abigail J.

In: Behavioural Processes, Vol. 64, No. 3, 31.10.2003, p. 273-286.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bdcb0eeda8ee4ecf85d55da96ef6ea88,
title = "Effects of multiple delayed rewards on delay discounting in an adjusting amount procedure",
abstract = "It has been suggested that when the delivery of several rewards is separated in time, e.g. one reward immediately and a second reward a few moments later, the value of an alternative that includes these {"}bundled{"} rewards will be the sum of the hyperbolic discount functions of the individual rewards. The current study examined this hypothesis using an adjusting amount procedure. In this procedure, rats chose between a delayed food alternative and an immediate food alternative, where the amount of immediate food altered according to each rat's choices. The size of the immediate reward when rats were indifferent between the delayed and immediate alternatives indexed the value of the delayed alternative. Discount functions describing the relationship between the indifference points and the delay to food were created for conditions in which the delay alternative consisted of a single reward (150μl of sucrose solution) delayed by 0, 2, 4, 8, or 16s following the reinforced response. These functions were used to predict the indifference points in other conditions for which an additional 150μl of sucrose solution was delivered at 0, 4, 8, or 16s following the reinforced response. The model fit the data well. However, there were systematic deviations that suggested animals were sensitive to the context within which delays were presented, in addition to the delays themselves. That is, preference for the delayed alternative was lower than predicted when the delay to the additional reward was long (8 or 16s) and higher than the predicted values when it was short (0 or 4s).",
keywords = "Choice, Delay discounting, Lever press, Multiple rewards, Rats",
author = "Suzanne Mitchell and Rosenthal, {Abigail J.}",
year = "2003",
month = "10",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1016/S0376-6357(03)00144-X",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "64",
pages = "273--286",
journal = "Behavioural Processes",
issn = "0376-6357",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of multiple delayed rewards on delay discounting in an adjusting amount procedure

AU - Mitchell, Suzanne

AU - Rosenthal, Abigail J.

PY - 2003/10/31

Y1 - 2003/10/31

N2 - It has been suggested that when the delivery of several rewards is separated in time, e.g. one reward immediately and a second reward a few moments later, the value of an alternative that includes these "bundled" rewards will be the sum of the hyperbolic discount functions of the individual rewards. The current study examined this hypothesis using an adjusting amount procedure. In this procedure, rats chose between a delayed food alternative and an immediate food alternative, where the amount of immediate food altered according to each rat's choices. The size of the immediate reward when rats were indifferent between the delayed and immediate alternatives indexed the value of the delayed alternative. Discount functions describing the relationship between the indifference points and the delay to food were created for conditions in which the delay alternative consisted of a single reward (150μl of sucrose solution) delayed by 0, 2, 4, 8, or 16s following the reinforced response. These functions were used to predict the indifference points in other conditions for which an additional 150μl of sucrose solution was delivered at 0, 4, 8, or 16s following the reinforced response. The model fit the data well. However, there were systematic deviations that suggested animals were sensitive to the context within which delays were presented, in addition to the delays themselves. That is, preference for the delayed alternative was lower than predicted when the delay to the additional reward was long (8 or 16s) and higher than the predicted values when it was short (0 or 4s).

AB - It has been suggested that when the delivery of several rewards is separated in time, e.g. one reward immediately and a second reward a few moments later, the value of an alternative that includes these "bundled" rewards will be the sum of the hyperbolic discount functions of the individual rewards. The current study examined this hypothesis using an adjusting amount procedure. In this procedure, rats chose between a delayed food alternative and an immediate food alternative, where the amount of immediate food altered according to each rat's choices. The size of the immediate reward when rats were indifferent between the delayed and immediate alternatives indexed the value of the delayed alternative. Discount functions describing the relationship between the indifference points and the delay to food were created for conditions in which the delay alternative consisted of a single reward (150μl of sucrose solution) delayed by 0, 2, 4, 8, or 16s following the reinforced response. These functions were used to predict the indifference points in other conditions for which an additional 150μl of sucrose solution was delivered at 0, 4, 8, or 16s following the reinforced response. The model fit the data well. However, there were systematic deviations that suggested animals were sensitive to the context within which delays were presented, in addition to the delays themselves. That is, preference for the delayed alternative was lower than predicted when the delay to the additional reward was long (8 or 16s) and higher than the predicted values when it was short (0 or 4s).

KW - Choice

KW - Delay discounting

KW - Lever press

KW - Multiple rewards

KW - Rats

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0142217415&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0142217415&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0376-6357(03)00144-X

DO - 10.1016/S0376-6357(03)00144-X

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0142217415

VL - 64

SP - 273

EP - 286

JO - Behavioural Processes

JF - Behavioural Processes

SN - 0376-6357

IS - 3

ER -